• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部癌手术中术前衰弱与手术阿普加评分之间的关联:一项前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析

Association between preoperative frailty and surgical Apgar score in abdominal cancer surgery: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Hirai Sayaka, Ida Mitsuru, Kinugasa Yuki, Kawaguchi Masahiko

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.

Department of Medical Technical Center, Nara Medical University Hospital, Kashihara, Japan.

出版信息

JA Clin Rep. 2024 Jan 13;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00687-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00687-3
PMID:38217669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10787715/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The surgical Apgar score is useful for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, its applicability in frail patients with minimal hemodynamic variation remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association between frailty and surgical Apgar score.

METHODS

This secondary analysis included 210 patients ≥ 65 years of age undergoing elective major abdominal surgery for cancer. Frailty was assessed using the Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire and defined as a total score of ≥ 3. The surgical Apgar score (range, 0-10; including mean blood pressure, heart rate, and blood loss volume) was compared between patients with or without frailty using the Mann-Whitney U test. Postoperative severe complications and length of postoperative stay were compared between patients with surgical Apgar scores ≤ 7 and > 7.

RESULTS

Among the included patients, 45 were classified as frail. The median [1st quartile, 3rd quartile] surgical Apgar scores in patients with and without frailty were 7.0 [7.0, 8.0] and 8.0 [7.0, 8.0], respectively (P = 0.03). Patients with surgical Apgar score ≤7 had a higher incidence of serious postoperative complications (P = 0.03) and longer hospital stays (P < 0.001) compared with patients with surgical Apgar score >7.

CONCLUSION

Frail patients have lower SAS, and patients with lower SAS have higher postoperative complication rates and longer hospital stays in patients who underwent cancer surgery.

摘要

引言

手术阿普加评分有助于预测术后发病率和死亡率。然而,其在血流动力学变化极小的体弱患者中的适用性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨体弱与手术阿普加评分之间的关联。

方法

这项二次分析纳入了210例年龄≥65岁、因癌症接受择期腹部大手术的患者。使用弗里德体弱表型问卷评估体弱情况,总分≥3分定义为体弱。采用曼-惠特尼U检验比较体弱和非体弱患者的手术阿普加评分(范围为0至10分,包括平均血压、心率和失血量)。比较手术阿普加评分≤7分和>7分的患者术后严重并发症及术后住院时间。

结果

纳入患者中,45例被归类为体弱。体弱和非体弱患者的手术阿普加评分中位数[第一四分位数,第三四分位数]分别为7.0[7.0,8.0]和8.0[7.0,8.0](P = 0.03)。与手术阿普加评分>7分的患者相比,手术阿普加评分≤7分的患者术后严重并发症发生率更高(P = 0.03),住院时间更长(P < 0.001)。

结论

体弱患者的手术阿普加评分较低,且手术阿普加评分较低的患者在接受癌症手术后术后并发症发生率更高,住院时间更长。

相似文献

1
Association between preoperative frailty and surgical Apgar score in abdominal cancer surgery: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.腹部癌手术中术前衰弱与手术阿普加评分之间的关联:一项前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析
JA Clin Rep. 2024 Jan 13;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00687-3.
2
The Surgical Apgar score combined with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment improves short- but not long-term outcome prediction in older patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.手术 Apgar 评分联合综合老年评估可改善行腹部癌症手术老年患者的短期但不能改善长期预后预测。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(6):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
The Surgical Apgar Score predicts outcomes of emergency abdominal surgeries both in fit and frail older patients.手术阿普加评分可预测健康和虚弱老年患者急诊腹部手术的结局。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
4
The Surgical Apgar Score and frailty as outcome predictors in short- and long-term evaluation of fit and frail older patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective cohort study.手术阿普加评分和虚弱程度作为接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的健康和虚弱老年患者短期和长期评估的结果预测指标——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Sep;13(3):350-357. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.75878. Epub 2018 May 21.
5
Predicting outcomes in head and neck surgery with modified frailty index and surgical apgar scores.用改良的衰弱指数和手术阿普加评分预测头颈部手术的结局。
Oral Oncol. 2024 Dec;159:107045. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107045. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire scores and postoperative patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery: A secondary analysis.Fried 衰弱表型问卷评分与行大腹部癌症手术患者术后患者报告结局的相关性:二次分析。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 May;24(5):464-469. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14872. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
Multidimentional Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Postoperative Complication Risk in Egyptian Geriatric Patients Undergoing Elective Cardiac Surgery.埃及老年择期心脏手术患者多维术前脆弱性评估与术后并发症风险。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(1):391-399. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201479.
8
Influence of interdisciplinary frailty screening on perioperative complication rates in elderly ovarian cancer patients: results of a retrospective observational study.跨学科衰弱筛查对老年卵巢癌患者围手术期并发症发生率的影响:一项回顾性观察研究的结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1929-1940. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06850-4. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
9
Which Frailty Evaluation Method Can Better Improve the Predictive Ability of the SASA for Postoperative Complications of Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery?哪种衰弱评估方法能更好地提高简易衰弱评估量表(SASA)对择期腹部手术患者术后并发症的预测能力?
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 May 5;18:541-550. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S357285. eCollection 2022.
10
Frailty in Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Increases Hospital Stay and 12-Month Readmission Rate.老年心脏手术患者的虚弱增加了住院时间和 12 个月再入院率。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Aug;29(8):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of recovery in hospital and disability-free survival at three months after major abdominal surgery.术后 3 个月时医院康复质量与无残疾生存。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):567-574. doi: 10.4097/kja.23082. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
The surgical Apgar score predicts postoperative complications and the survival in lung cancer patients.手术阿普加评分可预测肺癌患者术后并发症和生存情况。
Surg Today. 2023 Sep;53(9):1019-1027. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02677-x. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Improved Re-estimation of Perioperative Cardiac Risk Using the Surgical Apgar Score: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
采用手术 Apgar 评分改善围手术期心脏风险的再评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):65-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005509. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Utility of the surgical Apgar score for predicting the short- and long-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery.手术 Apgar 评分在预测接受手术的非小细胞肺癌患者短期和长期结局中的作用。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul 9;35(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac150.
5
Surgical Apgar Score and Controlling Nutritional Status Score are significant predictors of major complications after cervical spine surgery.手术阿普加评分和控制营养状况评分是颈椎手术后主要并发症的重要预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 22;12(1):6605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10674-2.
6
Surgical Apgar score could predict complications after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科 Apgar 评分可预测食管切除术的并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac045.
7
The impact of the surgical Apgar score on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.手术 Apgar 评分对结直肠癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02545-x.
8
Ability of the surgical Apgar score to predict acute kidney injury following radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术术后急性肾损伤的外科 Apgar 评分预测能力。
Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):194.e1-194.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
9
The Surgical Apgar Score Predicts Postoperative Complications in Elderly Patients After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.外科 Apgar 评分可预测老年结直肠癌患者术后并发症。
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):734-742. doi: 10.1177/00031348211038576. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Development of a Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire for Use in Screening Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文译文:用于社区居住的老年人筛查的 Fried 衰弱表型问卷的开发。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):272-276.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 12.