Luke Douglas A, Sorg Amy A, Combs Todd, Robichaux Christopher B, Moreland-Russell Sarah, Ribisl Kurt M, Henriksen Lisa
Center for Public Health Systems Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i44-i51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053075.
There are ∼380 000 tobacco retailers in the USA, where the largest tobacco companies spend almost $9 billion a year to promote their products. No systematic survey has been conducted of state-level activities to regulate the retail environment, thus little is known about what policies are being planned, proposed or implemented.
This longitudinal study is the first US survey of state tobacco control programmes (TCPs) about retail policy activities. Surveyed in 2012 and 2014, programme managers (n=46) reported activities in multiple domains: e-cigarettes, retailer density and licensing, non-tax price increases, product placement, advertising and promotion, health warnings and other approaches. Policy activities were reported in one of five levels: no formal activity, planning or advocating, policy was proposed, policy was enacted or policy was implemented. Overall and domain-specific activity scores were calculated for each state.
The average retail policy activity almost doubled between 2012 and 2014. States with the largest increase in scores included: Minnesota, which established a fee-based tobacco retail licensing system and banned self-service for e-cigarettes and all other tobacco products (OTP); Oregon, Kansas and Maine, all of which banned self-service for OTP; and West Virginia, which banned some types of flavoured OTP.
Retail policy activities in US states increased dramatically in a short time. Given what is known about the impact of the retail environment on tobacco use by youth and adults, state and local TCPs may want diversify policy priorities by implementing retail policies alongside tax and smoke-free air laws.
美国约有38万家烟草零售商,最大的烟草公司每年花费近90亿美元来推广其产品。目前尚未对各州规范零售环境的活动进行系统调查,因此对于正在规划、提议或实施的政策知之甚少。
这项纵向研究是美国首次针对州烟草控制项目(TCPs)零售政策活动的调查。2012年和2014年对项目管理人员(n = 46)进行了调查,他们报告了多个领域的活动:电子烟、零售商密度与许可、非税收价格上涨、产品摆放、广告与促销、健康警示及其他措施。政策活动报告分为五个级别之一:无正式活动、规划或倡导,政策已提议,政策已颁布或政策已实施。计算每个州的总体及特定领域活动得分。
2012年至2014年期间,零售政策活动平均几乎翻了一番。得分增长最大的州包括:明尼苏达州,该州建立了基于费用的烟草零售许可系统,并禁止电子烟及所有其他烟草制品(OTP)自助服务;俄勒冈州、堪萨斯州和缅因州,这三个州均禁止OTP自助服务;以及西弗吉尼亚州,该州禁止某些口味的OTP。
美国各州的零售政策活动在短时间内大幅增加。鉴于已知零售环境对青少年和成年人烟草使用的影响,州和地方烟草控制项目可能希望通过实施零售政策以及税收和无烟空气法来使政策重点多样化。