• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机模拟评估小儿创伤性脑损伤患者在急诊科的住院时间

Computer Simulation to Assess Emergency Department Length of Stay in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Feng Tianshu, Ajdari Ali, Boyle Linda Ng, Kannan Nithya, Burd Randall, Groner Jonathan I, Farneth R Austin, Vavilala Monica S

机构信息

From the George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Jun 1;40(6):421-425. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003088. Epub 2024 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003088
PMID:38227782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11141338/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to identify how emergency department (ED) arrival rate, process of care, and physical layout can impact ED length of stay (LOS) in pediatric traumatic brain injury care.

METHODS

Process flows and value stream maps were developed for 3 level I pediatric trauma centers. Computer simulation models were also used to examine "what if" scenarios based on ED arrival rates.

RESULTS

Differences were observed in prearrival preparation time, ED physical layouts, and time spent on processes. Shorter prearrival preparation time, trauma bed location far from diagnostic or treatment areas, and ED arrival rates that exceed 20 patients/day prolonged ED LOS. This was particularly apparent in 1 center where computer simulation showed that relocation of trauma beds can reduce ED LOS regardless of the number of patients that arrive per day.

CONCLUSIONS

Exceeding certain threshold ED arrival rates of children with traumatic brain injury can substantially increase pediatric trauma center ED LOS but modifications to ED processes and bed location may mitigate this increase.

摘要

目的

我们的研究旨在确定急诊科(ED)的到达率、护理流程和物理布局如何影响小儿创伤性脑损伤护理中的急诊科住院时间(LOS)。

方法

为3个一级小儿创伤中心绘制了流程和价值流图。还使用计算机模拟模型来研究基于急诊科到达率的“如果……会怎样”的情景。

结果

在到达前准备时间、急诊科物理布局和流程所花费的时间方面观察到差异。到达前准备时间较短、创伤病床位置远离诊断或治疗区域以及急诊科到达率超过每天20例患者会延长急诊科住院时间。这在1个中心尤为明显,计算机模拟显示,无论每天到达的患者数量如何,创伤病床的重新安置都可以缩短急诊科住院时间。

结论

创伤性脑损伤患儿的急诊科到达率超过一定阈值会大幅增加小儿创伤中心的急诊科住院时间,但对急诊科流程和病床位置进行调整可能会减轻这种增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/5af5233a5a51/nihms-1935412-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/a247ceb57a4f/nihms-1935412-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/a80941dfa301/nihms-1935412-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/5af5233a5a51/nihms-1935412-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/a247ceb57a4f/nihms-1935412-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/a80941dfa301/nihms-1935412-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b71/11141338/5af5233a5a51/nihms-1935412-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Computer Simulation to Assess Emergency Department Length of Stay in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.计算机模拟评估小儿创伤性脑损伤患者在急诊科的住院时间
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Jun 1;40(6):421-425. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003088. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
2
Pediatric sports-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心的儿童运动相关创伤性脑损伤
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15612.
3
Platinum Hour: Emergency Department Length of Stay and Trauma Patients' Outcomes.铂金时间:急诊科留观时间与创伤患者的治疗结果
J Surg Res. 2024 Dec;304:237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.024. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
4
Association of emergency department and hospital characteristics with elopements and length of stay.急诊科及医院特征与擅自离院及住院时间的关联
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.133. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Comparison of Emergency Department Disposition Times in Adult Level I and Level II Trauma Centers.一级和二级成人创伤中心急诊科处置时间的比较
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):938-945. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20523.
6
Emergency department length of stay in critical nonoperative trauma.危急非手术创伤患者在急诊科的留观时间。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.079. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
7
A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury.创伤和损伤严重程度评分与损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤儿童高价值治疗结局中的比较分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Sep 13;34(6):557-565. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.PEDS24309. Print 2024 Dec 1.
8
Simulation of the Emergency Department Care Process for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤急诊科护理流程模拟
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Mar/Apr;40(2):110-118. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000119.
9
Mode of Transport and Trauma Activation Status in Admitted Pediatric Trauma Patients.入院创伤患儿的交通方式与创伤激活状态。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
10
The Epidemiology of Emergency Department Trauma Discharges in the United States.美国急诊科创伤出院患者的流行病学
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1244-1256. doi: 10.1111/acem.13223. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Trauma resuscitation: can team behaviours in the prearrival period predict resuscitation performance?创伤复苏:院前阶段的团队行为能否预测复苏表现?
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Jul 6;3(3):106-110. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000143. eCollection 2017.
2
Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.中国2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的特征及重要经验教训:来自中国疾病预防控制中心72314例病例报告的总结
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648.
3
Checklist for Head Injury Management Evaluation Study (CHIMES): a quality improvement initiative to reduce imaging utilisation for head injuries in the emergency department.
头部损伤管理评估研究清单(CHIMES):一项旨在减少急诊科头部损伤影像学检查使用率的质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Feb;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000811.
4
Association Between Prearrival Notification Time and Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol Adherence.到达前通知时间与高级创伤生命支持方案遵守情况的关系。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Variation in Guideline Implementation and Adherence Regarding Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment: A CENTER-TBI Survey Study in Europe.指南实施和严重创伤性脑损伤治疗依从性的变化:欧洲 CENTER-TBI 调查研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e515-e520. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.116. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children.儿童医院创伤团队启动标准的系统评价
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256.
7
The Pediatric Guideline Adherence and Outcomes (PEGASUS) programme in severe traumatic brain injury: a single-centre hybrid implementation and effectiveness study.小儿严重创伤性脑损伤指南依从性和结局(PEGASUS)研究:单中心混合实施和效果研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;3(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30341-9. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Simulation of the Emergency Department Care Process for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤急诊科护理流程模拟
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Mar/Apr;40(2):110-118. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000119.
9
Systematic Layout Planning of a Radiology Reporting Area to Optimize Radiologists' Performance.放射科报告区域的系统布局规划,以优化放射科医生的绩效。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Apr;31(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0036-9.
10
Examining Emergency Department Treatment Processes in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.检查小儿严重创伤性脑损伤的急诊科治疗流程。
J Healthc Qual. 2017 Nov/Dec;39(6):334-344. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000052.