Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Elife. 2024 Jan 17;12:RP87729. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87729.
Each brain response to a stimulus is, to a large extent, unique. However this variability, our perceptual experience feels stable. Standard decoding models, which utilise information across several areas to tap into stimuli representation and processing, are fundamentally based on averages. Therefore, they can focus precisely on the features that are most stable across stimulus presentations. But which are these features exactly is difficult to address in the absence of a generative model of the signal. Here, I introduce , a generative model of brain responses to stimulation publicly available as a Python package that, when confronted with a decoding algorithm, can reproduce the structured patterns of decoding accuracy that we observe in real data. Using this approach, I characterise how these patterns may be brought about by the different aspects of the signal, which in turn may translate into distinct putative neural mechanisms. In particular, the model shows that the features in the data that support successful decoding-and, therefore, likely reflect stable mechanisms of stimulus representation-have an oscillatory component that spans multiple channels, frequencies, and latencies of response; and an additive, slower response with a specific (cross-frequency) relation to the phase of the oscillatory component. At the individual trial level, still, responses are found to be highly variable, which can be due to various factors including phase noise and probabilistic activations.
每个大脑对刺激的反应在很大程度上都是独特的。然而,这种可变性使我们的感知体验感到稳定。标准的解码模型利用跨多个区域的信息来挖掘刺激的表示和处理,它们的基础是平均值。因此,它们可以精确地关注在刺激呈现中最稳定的特征。但是,在缺乏信号生成模型的情况下,很难确定这些特征到底是什么。在这里,我引入了一种生成模型,用于大脑对刺激的反应,该模型以 Python 包的形式公开提供,当面对解码算法时,它可以再现我们在实际数据中观察到的解码精度的结构化模式。使用这种方法,我描述了这些模式可能是如何由信号的不同方面带来的,这反过来又可能转化为不同的潜在神经机制。特别是,该模型表明,数据中支持成功解码的特征-因此,可能反映了刺激表示的稳定机制-具有跨越多个通道、频率和反应潜伏期的振荡成分;以及与振荡成分的相位具有特定(跨频)关系的加性、较慢的响应。然而,在个体试验水平上,仍然发现反应具有高度的可变性,这可能是由于各种因素,包括相位噪声和概率激活。