Centre de Recherche en Neuroscience de Lyon, CNRS, Lyon 69675, France.
Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
eNeuro. 2024 Feb 26;11(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0229-23.2023. Print 2024 Feb.
High-density neural devices are now offering the possibility to record from neuronal populations in vivo at unprecedented scale. However, the mechanical drifts often observed in these recordings are currently a major issue for "spike sorting," an essential analysis step to identify the activity of single neurons from extracellular signals. Although several strategies have been proposed to compensate for such drifts, the lack of proper benchmarks makes it hard to assess the quality and effectiveness of motion correction. In this paper, we present a benchmark study to precisely and quantitatively evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art motion correction algorithms introduced in the literature. Using simulated recordings with induced drifts, we dissect the origins of the errors performed while applying a motion correction algorithm as a preprocessing step in the spike sorting pipeline. We show how important it is to properly estimate the positions of the neurons from extracellular traces in order to correctly estimate the probe motion, compare several interpolation procedures, and highlight what are the current limits for motion correction approaches.
高密度神经设备现在提供了在前所未有的规模上对体内神经元群体进行记录的可能性。然而,这些记录中经常观察到的机械漂移目前是“尖峰分类”的一个主要问题,“尖峰分类”是从细胞外信号中识别单个神经元活动的一个基本分析步骤。尽管已经提出了几种策略来补偿这种漂移,但缺乏适当的基准使得难以评估运动校正的质量和效果。在本文中,我们进行了一项基准研究,以精确和定量地评估文献中介绍的几种最先进的运动校正算法的性能。使用具有诱导漂移的模拟记录,我们剖析了在将运动校正算法作为尖峰分类管道中的预处理步骤应用时所产生的误差的来源。我们展示了从细胞外迹线中正确估计神经元位置对于正确估计探针运动的重要性,比较了几种插值过程,并强调了运动校正方法的当前限制。