• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症影像档案的人口构成差异。

Disparities in the Demographic Composition of The Cancer Imaging Archive.

机构信息

From the Department of Diagnostic Medicine (A.D., J.V.), Livestrong Cancer Institutes (J.V.), and Department of Oncology (J.V.), Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, 210 E 24th St, Austin, TX 78712; and Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (J.V.).

出版信息

Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Jan;6(1):e230100. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230100.

DOI:10.1148/rycan.230100
PMID:38240671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825717/
Abstract

Purpose To characterize the demographic distribution of The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) studies and compare them with those of the U.S. cancer population. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, data from TCIA studies were examined for the inclusion of demographic information. Of 189 studies in TCIA up until April 2023, a total of 83 human cancer studies were found to contain supporting demographic data. The median patient age and the sex, race, and ethnicity proportions of each study were calculated and compared with those of the U.S. cancer population, provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool. Results The median age of TCIA patients was found to be 6.84 years lower than that of the U.S. cancer population ( = .047) and contained more female than male patients (53% vs 47%). American Indian and Alaska Native, Black or African American, and Hispanic patients were underrepresented in TCIA studies by 47.7%, 35.8%, and 14.7%, respectively, compared with the U.S. cancer population. Conclusion The results demonstrate that the patient demographics of TCIA data sets do not reflect those of the U.S. cancer population, which may decrease the generalizability of artificial intelligence radiology tools developed using these imaging data sets. Ethics, Meta-Analysis, Health Disparities, Cancer Health Disparities, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Race, Ethnicity, Sex, Age, Bias Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

摘要

目的

描述癌症影像学档案(TCIA)研究的人口统计学分布,并将其与美国癌症人群进行比较。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对 TCIA 研究中的数据进行了检查,以纳入人口统计学信息。在截至 2023 年 4 月的 TCIA 中,共有 189 项研究,其中有 83 项人类癌症研究包含支持性人口统计学数据。计算并比较了每项研究的中位患者年龄以及性别、种族和民族比例,与美国癌症人群(由美国癌症研究所和疾病控制与预防中心的监测、流行病学和最终结果计划以及美国癌症统计数据可视化工具提供)进行了比较。

结果

TCIA 患者的中位年龄比美国癌症人群低 6.84 岁( =.047),女性患者多于男性患者(53%比 47%)。与美国癌症人群相比,TCIA 研究中美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民、黑人和非裔美国人以及西班牙裔患者的比例分别低 47.7%、35.8%和 14.7%。

结论

结果表明,TCIA 数据集的患者人口统计学特征与美国癌症人群不相符,这可能会降低使用这些影像学数据集开发的人工智能放射学工具的普遍性。

伦理

这项研究是回顾性的,因此不需要伦理审查。

利益冲突

作者没有报告任何利益冲突。

出版

这项研究发表在 CC BY 4.0 许可下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/160e4c9baa29/rycan.230100.fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/8fad28b91974/rycan.230100.VA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/b932cf5b6af5/rycan.230100.fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/160e4c9baa29/rycan.230100.fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/8fad28b91974/rycan.230100.VA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/b932cf5b6af5/rycan.230100.fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd3/10825717/160e4c9baa29/rycan.230100.fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities in the Demographic Composition of The Cancer Imaging Archive.癌症影像档案的人口构成差异。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Jan;6(1):e230100. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230100.
2
Increasing diversity in clinical trials: demographic trends at the National Cancer Institute, 2005-2020.临床试验中的多样性增加:2005 年至 2020 年美国国家癌症研究所的人口趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1063-1071. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae018.
3
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Women With Gynecologic Cancer.妇科癌症女性患者参与临床试验中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46494.
5
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Performance of Prediction Models for Death by Suicide After Mental Health Visits.精神卫生就诊后自杀死亡预测模型表现的种族/民族差异。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):726-734. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0493.
6
Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Medical Artificial Intelligence: The Effects of Race and Ethnicity on a Deep Learning Model for ECG Analysis.评估和减轻医学人工智能中的偏见:种族和民族对心电图分析深度学习模型的影响。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;13(3):e007988. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007988. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
7
Association of Race-Ethnicity Intersection With Disparities in Cigarette Smoking in U.S. Adults.种族和民族交叉与美国成年人吸烟差异的关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jul 22;26(8):1066-1071. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae041.
8
State Variation in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Incidence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Among US Women.美国女性中三阴性乳腺癌发病率的种族和民族差异的州际变化。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):700-704. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7835.
9
Exploring the complexity and spectrum of racial/ethnic disparities in colon cancer management.探讨结肠癌管理中种族/民族差异的复杂性和范围。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 14;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01883-w.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Age-Specific All-Cause Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠大流行期间特定年龄段全因死亡率的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38918.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Based Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation Models in Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤学中基于人工智能的分割模型中的性别偏见
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Mar;39:103758. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2025.103758. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Clarification of Concerns about the Demographic Composition of The Cancer Imaging Archive.关于癌症影像存档库人口统计学构成的担忧之澄清
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 May;6(3):e240098. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240098.
3
Implications of Data Representation in Health Care Innovation.数据表示在医疗保健创新中的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the imaging appearance of breast cancer in African American women with non-Latina white women.非裔美国女性与非拉丁裔白种女性乳腺癌的影像学表现比较。
Clin Imaging. 2023 Jan;93:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
Brain Aging Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Middle-Aged and Older Adults.不同种族和民族的中老年人的大脑衰老。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jan 1;80(1):73-81. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3919.
3
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging.癌症成像中的人工智能与机器学习
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Jan;6(1):e230222. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230222.
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 27;2:133. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0. eCollection 2022.
4
Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations.人工智能算法应用于服务不足患者人群的胸部 X 光片时的漏诊偏倚。
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2176-2182. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01595-0. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Disparities and trends in the participation of minorities, women, and the elderly in breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer clinical trials.少数民族、女性和老年人参与乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌临床试验的差异和趋势。
Cancer. 2022 Feb 15;128(4):770-777. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33991. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.美国少数族裔的癌症健康差距。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(2):315-332. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01038-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Sex Differences and Tumor Blood Flow from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Are Associated with Treatment Response after Chemoradiation and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer.动态磁敏感对比 MRI 显示的性别差异和肿瘤血流与直肠癌放化疗后治疗反应和长期生存相关。
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):352-360. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200287. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis.医学影像数据集的性别失衡会导致计算机辅助诊断的分类器产生偏差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 9;117(23):12592-12594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919012117. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
The "All of Us" Research Program.“All of Us”研究计划。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937.
10
Open access image repositories: high-quality data to enable machine learning research.开放获取图像知识库:高质量数据,助力机器学习研究。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Jan;75(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 28.