• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿石症的个性化医疗:用于预防肾结石的草酸饮食管理的人工智能聊天机器人辅助方案

Personalized Medicine in Urolithiasis: AI Chatbot-Assisted Dietary Management of Oxalate for Kidney Stone Prevention.

作者信息

Aiumtrakul Noppawit, Thongprayoon Charat, Arayangkool Chinnawat, Vo Kristine B, Wannaphut Chalothorn, Suppadungsuk Supawadee, Krisanapan Pajaree, Garcia Valencia Oscar A, Qureshi Fawad, Miao Jing, Cheungpasitporn Wisit

机构信息

Department of Medicine, John A. Burn School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):107. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010107.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14010107
PMID:38248809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10817681/
Abstract

Accurate information regarding oxalate levels in foods is essential for managing patients with hyperoxaluria, oxalate nephropathy, or those susceptible to calcium oxalate stones. This study aimed to assess the reliability of chatbots in categorizing foods based on their oxalate content. We assessed the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard AI, and Bing Chat to classify dietary oxalate content per serving into low (<5 mg), moderate (5-8 mg), and high (>8 mg) oxalate content categories. A total of 539 food items were processed through each chatbot. The accuracy was compared between chatbots and stratified by dietary oxalate content categories. Bard AI had the highest accuracy of 84%, followed by Bing (60%), GPT-4 (52%), and GPT-3.5 (49%) ( < 0.001). There was a significant pairwise difference between chatbots, except between GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 ( = 0.30). The accuracy of all the chatbots decreased with a higher degree of dietary oxalate content categories but Bard remained having the highest accuracy, regardless of dietary oxalate content categories. There was considerable variation in the accuracy of AI chatbots for classifying dietary oxalate content. Bard AI consistently showed the highest accuracy, followed by Bing Chat, GPT-4, and GPT-3.5. These results underline the potential of AI in dietary management for at-risk patient groups and the need for enhancements in chatbot algorithms for clinical accuracy.

摘要

对于管理高草酸尿症、草酸肾病患者或易患草酸钙结石的患者而言,有关食物中草酸盐含量的准确信息至关重要。本研究旨在评估聊天机器人根据食物草酸盐含量对食物进行分类的可靠性。我们评估了ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4、Bard AI和必应聊天对每份膳食草酸盐含量分类为低(<5毫克)、中(5-8毫克)和高(>8毫克)草酸盐含量类别的准确性。每个聊天机器人共处理了539种食物。比较了聊天机器人之间的准确性,并按膳食草酸盐含量类别进行分层。Bard AI的准确率最高,为84%,其次是必应(60%)、GPT-4(52%)和GPT-3.5(49%)(<0.001)。聊天机器人之间存在显著的两两差异,但GPT-4和GPT-3.5之间除外(=0.30)。所有聊天机器人的准确性随着膳食草酸盐含量类别的升高而降低,但无论膳食草酸盐含量类别如何,Bard的准确性仍然最高。人工智能聊天机器人在分类膳食草酸盐含量方面的准确性存在相当大的差异。Bard AI始终显示出最高的准确性,其次是必应聊天、GPT-4和GPT-3.5。这些结果强调了人工智能在高危患者群体饮食管理中的潜力,以及提高聊天机器人算法临床准确性的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a806/10817681/591450e08bc9/jpm-14-00107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a806/10817681/56a157a60a15/jpm-14-00107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a806/10817681/591450e08bc9/jpm-14-00107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a806/10817681/56a157a60a15/jpm-14-00107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a806/10817681/591450e08bc9/jpm-14-00107-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Personalized Medicine in Urolithiasis: AI Chatbot-Assisted Dietary Management of Oxalate for Kidney Stone Prevention.尿石症的个性化医疗:用于预防肾结石的草酸饮食管理的人工智能聊天机器人辅助方案
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):107. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010107.
2
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.人工智能聊天机器人对改编自患者手册的青光眼问题的回答情况。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56766. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性:公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
AI-Powered Renal Diet Support: Performance of ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat.人工智能驱动的肾脏饮食支持:ChatGPT、Bard AI和必应聊天的性能
Clin Pract. 2023 Sep 26;13(5):1160-1172. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050104.
5
Comparison of artificial intelligence large language model chatbots in answering frequently asked questions in anaesthesia.人工智能大语言模型聊天机器人在回答麻醉常见问题方面的比较。
BJA Open. 2024 May 8;10:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100280. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5 and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions.人类与人工智能:ChatGPT-4在临床化学选择题方面表现优于必应、巴德、ChatGPT-3.5和人类。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Sep 20;15:857-871. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S479801. eCollection 2024.
7
Efficacy of AI Chats to Determine an Emergency: A Comparison Between OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI Chat.人工智能聊天工具在判定紧急情况方面的效能:OpenAI的ChatGPT、谷歌巴德和微软必应人工智能聊天工具的比较
Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45473. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Navigating the Landscape of Personalized Medicine: The Relevance of ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard AI in Nephrology Literature Searches.探索个性化医疗的版图:ChatGPT、必应聊天和巴德人工智能在肾脏病学文献检索中的相关性
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 30;13(10):1457. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101457.
9
Bias and Inaccuracy in AI Chatbot Ophthalmologist Recommendations.人工智能聊天机器人眼科医生建议中的偏差与不准确之处。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45911. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence chatbots as public sources of information on endodontics.人工智能聊天机器人作为牙髓学公共信息源的有效性和可靠性。
Int Endod J. 2024 Mar;57(3):305-314. doi: 10.1111/iej.14014. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.尿石症患者在线资料的跨语言分析:对24种欧洲语言的评估
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):221-227. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0045. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Comparative Performance of Chatbots in Endodontic Clinical Decision Support: A 4-Day Accuracy and Consistency Study.聊天机器人在牙髓病临床决策支持中的比较性能:一项为期4天的准确性和一致性研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jul 27;75(5):100920. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100920.
3
Accuracy of Large Language Models When Answering Clinical Research Questions: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Chain of Thought Utilization in Large Language Models and Application in Nephrology.大语言模型中的思维链利用及其在肾脏病学中的应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 13;60(1):148. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010148.
2
Innovating Personalized Nephrology Care: Exploring the Potential Utilization of ChatGPT.创新个性化肾脏病护理:探索ChatGPT的潜在应用
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 4;13(12):1681. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121681.
3
Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures.
大型语言模型回答临床研究问题的准确性:系统评价与网络荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e64486. doi: 10.2196/64486.
4
Testing and Evaluation of Health Care Applications of Large Language Models: A Systematic Review.大语言模型在医疗保健应用中的测试与评估:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):319-328. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21700.
5
Identification of kidney-related medications using AI from self-captured pill images.利用 AI 从自拍的药丸图像中识别与肾脏相关的药物。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2402075. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2402075. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
6
Assessing the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Scoliosis Classification and Suggested Therapeutic Approaches.评估人工智能模型在脊柱侧弯分类中的准确性及建议的治疗方法。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):4013. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144013.
7
Artificial intelligence chatbots for the nutrition management of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.人工智能聊天机器人在糖尿病和代谢综合征的营养管理中的应用。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Oct;78(10):887-896. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01476-y. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
Global Trends in Kidney Stone Awareness: A Time Series Analysis from 2004-2023.肾结石认知的全球趋势:2004 - 2023年时间序列分析
Clin Pract. 2024 May 20;14(3):915-927. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030072.
9
Enhancing clinical decision-making: Optimizing ChatGPT's performance in hypertension care.增强临床决策:优化ChatGPT在高血压护理中的表现。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 May;26(5):588-593. doi: 10.1111/jch.14822. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Large Language Models in Nephrology: Advancing Practical Applications.将检索增强生成与大型语言模型在肾脏病学中的整合:推进实际应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 8;60(3):445. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030445.
通过聊天机器人生成的材料优化眼科患者教育:人工智能生成的患者教育材料和美国眼科整形重建外科学会患者手册的可读性分析。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;40(2):212-216. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002549. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
4
Leveraging Generative AI and Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Roadmap for Healthcare Integration.利用生成式人工智能和大语言模型:医疗保健整合综合路线图。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;11(20):2776. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202776.
5
Navigating the Landscape of Personalized Medicine: The Relevance of ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard AI in Nephrology Literature Searches.探索个性化医疗的版图:ChatGPT、必应聊天和巴德人工智能在肾脏病学文献检索中的相关性
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 30;13(10):1457. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101457.
6
AI-Powered Renal Diet Support: Performance of ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat.人工智能驱动的肾脏饮食支持:ChatGPT、Bard AI和必应聊天的性能
Clin Pract. 2023 Sep 26;13(5):1160-1172. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050104.
7
Artificial intelligence in the field of pharmacy practice: A literature review.药学实践领域中的人工智能:一篇文献综述。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Oct 21;12:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100346. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Performance of ChatGPT on Nephrology Test Questions.ChatGPT 在肾病学试题上的表现。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jan 1;19(1):35-43. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000330. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
9
Evaluating the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing AI, and Bard Against Conventional Drug-Drug Interactions Clinical Tools.评估ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4、必应人工智能和巴德相对于传统药物相互作用临床工具的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Sep 20;15:137-147. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S425858. eCollection 2023.
10
Artificial intelligence & clinical nutrition: What the future might have in store.人工智能与临床营养:未来可能的发展。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Oct;57:542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.07.082. Epub 2023 Jul 22.