• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多重填补数据评估有序因子分析模型中的紧密拟合

Evaluating Close Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Multiply Imputed Data.

作者信息

Shi Dexin, Zhang Bo, Liu Ren, Jiang Zhehan

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Feb;84(1):171-189. doi: 10.1177/00131644231158854. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1177/00131644231158854
PMID:38250503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10795567/
Abstract

Multiple imputation (MI) is one of the recommended techniques for handling missing data in ordinal factor analysis models. However, methods for computing MI-based fit indices under ordinal factor analysis models have yet to be developed. In this short note, we introduced the methods of using the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) to assess the fit of ordinal factor analysis models with multiply imputed data. Specifically, we described the procedure for computing the MI-based sample estimates and constructing the confidence intervals. Simulation results showed that the proposed methods could yield sufficiently accurate point and interval estimates for both SRMR and RMSEA, especially in conditions with larger sample sizes, less missing data, more response categories, and higher degrees of misfit. Based on the findings, implications and recommendations were discussed.

摘要

多重填补(MI)是在有序因子分析模型中处理缺失数据的推荐技术之一。然而,在有序因子分析模型下计算基于MI的拟合指数的方法尚未得到发展。在本简短报告中,我们介绍了使用标准化均方根残差(SRMR)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)来评估具有多重填补数据的有序因子分析模型拟合度的方法。具体而言,我们描述了计算基于MI的样本估计值和构建置信区间的过程。模拟结果表明,所提出的方法能够为SRMR和RMSEA产生足够准确的点估计和区间估计,特别是在样本量较大、缺失数据较少、响应类别较多以及拟合不佳程度较高的情况下。基于这些发现,我们讨论了其影响和建议。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Close Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Multiply Imputed Data.使用多重填补数据评估有序因子分析模型中的紧密拟合
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Feb;84(1):171-189. doi: 10.1177/00131644231158854. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.拟合存在缺失数据的有序因子分析模型:成对删除法与多重填补法的比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):41-66. doi: 10.1177/0013164419845039. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.用小自由度评估 SEM 模型拟合度。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):179-207. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
4
Evaluating Imputation-Based Fit Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling With Ordinal Data: The MI2S Approach.在序数数据结构方程模型中评估基于插补的拟合统计量:MI2S方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jul 27:00131644241261271. doi: 10.1177/00131644241261271.
5
Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Fake Perturbation of Ordinal Data: A Sample by Replacement Approach.拟合指数对有序数据虚假扰动的敏感性:一种重复抽样方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Jul;47(4):519-46. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.692616.
6
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.在随机对照试验中对患者报告结局测量进行多重插补:在项目、分量表或综合评分层面插补的优缺点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Aug 28;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0542-6.
7
Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models.评估结构方程模型中模型拟合不佳的程度
Psychometrika. 2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7.
8
Multiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey data.使用调查数据估计艾滋病毒流行率时对无应答情况的多重填补法
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 16;15:1059. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2390-1.
9
Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.使用标准化均方根残差(SRMR)评估结构方程模型中的精确拟合度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):110-130. doi: 10.1177/0013164420926231. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire applied to Brazilian nurses: evidence of validity.真实领导行为问卷在巴西护士中的应用:效度证据。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022 Jul 15;30:e3607. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5868.3607. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Imputation-Based Fit Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling With Ordinal Data: The MI2S Approach.在序数数据结构方程模型中评估基于插补的拟合统计量:MI2S方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jul 27:00131644241261271. doi: 10.1177/00131644241261271.

本文引用的文献

1
Fitting Latent Growth Models with Small Sample Sizes and Non-normal Missing Data.用小样本量和非正态缺失数据拟合潜在增长模型。
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 Mar;45(2):179-192. doi: 10.1177/0165025420979365. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.估计方法对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):421-445. doi: 10.1177/0013164419885164. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.改善结构方程模型中类别数据的适配指数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 May-Jun;56(3):390-407. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.拟合存在缺失数据的有序因子分析模型:成对删除法与多重填补法的比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):41-66. doi: 10.1177/0013164419845039. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Evaluating methods for handling missing ordinal data in structural equation modeling.评估结构方程建模中处理缺失有序数据的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2337-2355. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1187-4.
6
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI:他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
7
Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models.评估结构方程模型中模型拟合不佳的程度
Psychometrika. 2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7.
8
Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality.针对非正态性调整增量拟合指数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.933697.
9
Methods for mediation analysis with missing data.处理缺失数据的中介分析方法。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jan;78(1):154-84. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9301-5. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
10
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.