• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于中国儿童隐喻理解发展的实证研究。

An empirical study on the development of metaphorical comprehension of Chinese children.

作者信息

Cheng Lulu, Guan Yingming, Zhang Ting, Zhan Linlin, Liu Yanqin, Wang Peng, Yu Shanshan, Peng Yule

机构信息

Shanghai Center for Research in English Language Education, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.

School of Foreign Studies, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1254129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254129. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254129
PMID:38259583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10800952/
Abstract

Metaphor affects how people focus, remember, and process information and significantly influences children's language development. The study explored metaphorical comprehension by Chinese children of different ages (5-8 years). We collected response times and accuracy rates when they processed metaphorical and literal sentences with the graded salience. Linear mixed-effects modeling showed that Chinese children's metaphorical ability improved with age. Subsequent analysis found that the perception period of metaphorical knowledge was at age 5, the development stage of metaphorical knowledge was at age 6 and 7, and the rational decision period of metaphorical ability was at age 8. After 8-year-old, children can invoke the knowledge of the intention schema while activating the source domain, and this knowledge can be automatically and quickly mapped to the target domain. Meanwhile, language development and cognitive processing influenced the metaphorical comprehension of Chinese children, especially children of 8 years of age who had the highest correct rate and the shortest reaction time to process low-saliency metaphorical sentences, while 5-year-old children had the highest accuracy in high-saliency metaphorical sentence and 6-year-old children got the longest reaction time to process sentence in high-saliency metaphor. This study may provide evidence for improving and training metaphor comprehension in children with special needs such as those with an autism spectrum disorder.

摘要

隐喻影响人们关注、记忆和处理信息的方式,并对儿童的语言发展产生重大影响。本研究探讨了不同年龄(5 - 8岁)中国儿童的隐喻理解能力。我们收集了他们处理具有不同显著程度的隐喻句和直义句时的反应时间和准确率。线性混合效应模型显示,中国儿童的隐喻能力随年龄增长而提高。后续分析发现,隐喻知识的感知期在5岁,隐喻知识的发展期在6岁和7岁,隐喻能力的理性决策期在8岁。8岁以后,儿童在激活源域的同时能够调用意图图式的知识,并且这种知识能够自动且快速地映射到目标域。同时,语言发展和认知加工影响中国儿童的隐喻理解,尤其是8岁儿童处理低显著程度隐喻句时正确率最高且反应时间最短,而5岁儿童处理高显著程度隐喻句时准确率最高,6岁儿童处理高显著程度隐喻句时反应时间最长。本研究可能为改善和训练有特殊需求儿童(如自闭症谱系障碍儿童)的隐喻理解提供证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/875d74e27b64/fpsyg-14-1254129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/825f5b4c04ac/fpsyg-14-1254129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/bb096ee00735/fpsyg-14-1254129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/875d74e27b64/fpsyg-14-1254129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/825f5b4c04ac/fpsyg-14-1254129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/bb096ee00735/fpsyg-14-1254129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec65/10800952/875d74e27b64/fpsyg-14-1254129-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An empirical study on the development of metaphorical comprehension of Chinese children.关于中国儿童隐喻理解发展的实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1254129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254129. eCollection 2023.
2
Is the Processing of Chinese Verbal Metaphors Simulated or Abstracted? Evidence From an ERP Study.中文言语隐喻的加工是模拟的还是抽象的?来自一项ERP研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:877997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877997. eCollection 2022.
3
Metaphor processing: Referring and predicating.隐喻处理:指称与断言。
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105534. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105534. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Engineering creativity: Prior experience modulates electrophysiological responses to novel metaphors.工程创造力:先前的经验调节对新颖隐喻的电生理反应。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13630. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13630. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.根据视觉启动词的语义匹配,动作动词在隐喻和字面句子中的处理方式不同。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 4;8:982. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00982. eCollection 2014.
6
Does the coexistence of literal and figurative meanings in metaphor comprehension yield novel meaning?: Empirical testing based on quantum cognition.隐喻理解中字面意义和比喻意义的共存会产生新的意义吗?:基于量子认知的实证检验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1146262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146262. eCollection 2023.
7
Metaphor priming in sentence production: concrete pictures affect abstract language production.句子生成中的隐喻启动:具体图片影响抽象语言生成。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.右半球在隐喻理解中的作用:功能磁共振成像研究的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jan;35(1):107-22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22160. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
9
Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.事件相关电位证据表明,在理解常规词汇隐喻时,字面意义会被早期激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1730-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
From action to abstraction: The sensorimotor grounding of metaphor in Parkinson's disease.从动作到抽象:帕金森病中隐喻的感觉运动基础。
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:362-384. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prime effects in metaphor comprehension: comparing congruent and opposite schematic primes.隐喻理解中的启动效应:比较一致和相反的图式启动刺激
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 25;15:1355045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355045. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension.隐喻思维的快与慢:深思熟虑隐喻理论为隐喻及其理解提供了一种新模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1242888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242888. eCollection 2023.
2
Metaphor processing: Referring and predicating.隐喻处理:指称与断言。
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105534. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105534. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Big Words for Little Kids: Rare Vocabulary Use by Preschool Children.大词小孩说:学前儿童罕见词汇的使用。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jul 10;32(4):1705-1713. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00349. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
Is the Processing of Chinese Verbal Metaphors Simulated or Abstracted? Evidence From an ERP Study.中文言语隐喻的加工是模拟的还是抽象的?来自一项ERP研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:877997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877997. eCollection 2022.
5
The Development of Advanced Theory of Mind in Middle Childhood: A Longitudinal Study From Age 5 to 10 Years.从中年到青春期的高级心理理论的发展:从 5 岁到 10 岁的纵向研究。
Child Dev. 2021 Sep;92(5):1872-1888. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13627. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing.隐喻鲨鱼会咬人吗?隐喻加工中的模拟与抽象。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):557-570. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01109-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood?解读身心隐喻:心理理论是否与儿童中期的语用学有关?
J Child Lang. 2019 Mar;46(2):393-407. doi: 10.1017/S030500091800048X. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
The interplay between moral actions and moral judgments in children and adults.儿童和成人的道德行为与道德判断之间的相互作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Aug;63:183-197. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Developmental Steps in Metaphorical Language Abilities: The Influence of Age, Gender, Cognitive Flexibility, Information Processing Speed, and Analogical Reasoning.隐喻语言能力的发展阶段:年龄、性别、认知灵活性、信息处理速度和类比推理的影响
Lang Speech. 2019 Jun;62(2):207-228. doi: 10.1177/0023830917746552. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning.语言隐喻如何支撑推理。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;21(11):852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.