Steen Gerard J
Department of Dutch Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1242888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242888. eCollection 2023.
The immense increase in metaphor theory and research over the past decades is posing a threat of fragmentation to the field, which has been responded to by calls for new and more encompassing approaches to virtually all aspects metaphorical. This article argues that the opposite response may be more productive. By focusing on a different way of theorizing metaphor and its comprehension, existing theories and data can be re-ordered in an alternative and coherent way, which moreover breaks new grounds in tying up both with a general theory for all utterance comprehension as well as a general theory for all cognition as involving fast and slow thinking. The core of the new theory highlights the differentiation between deliberate and non-deliberate metaphor use, related to how people see the use of a metaphor as a metaphor in communication, that is, as a metaphor that counts as a metaphor between language users. It shows how this distinction can be employed to make sense of many insights about metaphor and its comprehension in innovative ways. The article outlines the foundations of the new theory and discusses how existing data, old and new, can be seen as supporting the new proposals.
在过去几十年里,隐喻理论与研究的大幅增长正给该领域带来碎片化的威胁,对此人们呼吁采用新的、更具包容性的方法来处理隐喻几乎所有方面的问题。本文认为,相反的回应或许更具成效。通过聚焦于一种不同的隐喻理论化方式及其理解方式,现有的理论和数据能够以一种不同但连贯的方式重新排序,而且在将其与关于所有话语理解的一般理论以及关于涉及快速与慢速思维的所有认知的一般理论相联系方面开辟了新领域。新理论的核心强调了有意和无意使用隐喻之间的区别,这与人们如何在交流中将隐喻的使用视为隐喻有关,也就是说,视为语言使用者之间算作隐喻的隐喻。它展示了如何以创新的方式利用这种区别来理解关于隐喻及其理解的诸多见解。本文概述了新理论的基础,并讨论了如何将新旧现有数据视为对新提议的支持。