Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/E. P. Bradley Hospital, Sleep for Science Research Lab, Providence, Rhode Island.
Division of Pediatric Behavioral Health, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
Sleep Health. 2024 Apr;10(2):221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.11.013. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
OBJECTIVES: To test whether adolescents' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with the combination of their instructional approach(es) and their sleep patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Adolescents were recruited through social media outlets in October and November 2020 to complete an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 4442 geographically and racially diverse, community-dwelling students (grades 6-12, 51% female, 36% non-White, 87% high schoolers). MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed items from the PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety scales. Participants reported their instructional approach(es), bedtimes, and wake times for each day in the past week. Participants were categorized into five combined instructional approach groups. Average sleep opportunity was calculated as the average time between bedtime and waketime. Social jetlag was calculated as the difference between the average sleep midpoint preceding non-scheduled and scheduled days. RESULTS: Emotional distress was elevated in this sample, with a large proportion of adolescents reporting moderate-severe (T-score ≥ 65) levels of depressive symptoms (49%) and anxiety (28%). There were significant differences between instructional approach groups, such that adolescents attending all schooldays in-person reported the lowest depressive symptom and anxiety T-scores (P < .001, η = .012), but also the shortest sleep opportunity (P < .001, η = .077) and greatest social jetlag (P < .001, η = .037) of all groups. Adolescents attending school in person, with sufficient sleep opportunity (≥8-9 hours/night) and limited social jetlag (<2 hours) had significantly lower depressive (η = .014) and anxiety (η = .008) T-scores than other adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritizing in-person education and promoting healthy sleep patterns (more sleep opportunity, more consistent sleep schedules) may help bolster adolescent mental health.
目的:检验青少年在新冠疫情期间的心理健康是否与其教学方式和睡眠模式的组合有关。 设计:横断面研究。 地点:2020 年 10 月至 11 月,通过社交媒体渠道招募青少年完成在线调查。 参与者:参与者为 4442 名具有不同地理位置和种族背景的社区居住学生(6-12 年级,51%为女性,36%为非白人,87%为高中生)。 测量方法:参与者完成了 PROMIS 儿童抑郁症状和焦虑量表的项目。参与者报告了过去一周内每天的教学方式、就寝时间和起床时间。参与者被归入五个综合教学方式组。平均睡眠机会被计算为从就寝时间到起床时间之间的平均时间。社会时差被计算为非计划日和计划日之前平均睡眠中点的差异。 结果:该样本中情绪困扰程度较高,有相当大比例的青少年报告中度至重度(T 评分≥65)抑郁症状(49%)和焦虑(28%)。教学方式组之间存在显著差异,例如,所有上学日都亲自上学的青少年报告的抑郁症状和焦虑 T 评分最低(P<0.001,η=0.012),但睡眠机会最短(P<0.001,η=0.077)和社会时差最大(P<0.001,η=0.037)。亲自上学、有足够睡眠机会(≥8-9 小时/夜)和有限社会时差(<2 小时)的青少年,其抑郁(η=0.014)和焦虑(η=0.008)T 评分显著低于其他青少年。 结论:优先考虑亲自教育并促进健康的睡眠模式(更多的睡眠机会,更一致的睡眠时间表)可能有助于增强青少年的心理健康。
Health Technol Assess. 2025-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-6-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-15
BMC Psychiatry. 2025-7-1
J Adolesc Health. 2022-1
Sleep Med Rev. 2021-6
Qual Life Res. 2021-4
Chronobiol Int. 2019-2-20
J Adolesc. 2018-6-13