• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索情绪元认知的定量测量。

Exploring quantitative measures in metacognition of emotion.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):1990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49709-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-49709-7
PMID:38263192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805884/
Abstract

Metacognition of emotion (meta-emotion) refers to the ability to evaluate and identify one's emotional feelings. No previous study has defined and measured this construct through objective and quantitative procedures. We established a reliable method to measure meta-emotion. With a two-interval forced-choice procedure, participants selected which of two pictures elicited stronger positive emotion; via the Law of Comparative Judgment, their responses were used to compute individual psychological distances for the emotional responses triggered by the pictures. Then, participants were asked to judge whether a pre-exposed picture induced a stronger positive emotion than the median of that elicited by the whole picture set, followed by a confidence rating. By utilizing each individual's psychological distance, the correctness of a participant's emotional experience was quantified by d', and meta-emotion was quantified using meta-d', M-ratio, and M-diff as indices of metacognitive sensitivity and efficiency based on Signal-Detection Theory. Test-retest reliabilities, validated by Spearman correlation, were observed in meta-d', M-ratio, and marginally with M-diff, suggesting the stability of meta-emotion in the current design. This study unveils a validated procedure to quantify meta-emotion, extendable for assessing metacognition of other subjective feelings. Nevertheless, caution is warranted in interpretation, as the measured processes may be influenced by non-metacognitive factors.

摘要

情绪元认知(meta-emotion)是指评估和识别自身情绪感受的能力。之前没有研究通过客观和定量的程序来定义和测量这个结构。我们建立了一种可靠的方法来测量情绪元认知。通过双区间迫选程序,参与者选择哪两张图片能引发更强的正面情绪;通过比较判断定律,根据参与者对图片引发的情绪反应的反应,计算出个体的心理距离。然后,要求参与者判断预先曝光的图片是否比整个图片集诱发的平均情绪更强,同时给出信心评分。通过利用每个人的心理距离,根据信号检测理论,使用 d'来量化参与者情绪体验的正确性,使用 meta-d'、M-ratio 和 M-diff 作为元认知敏感性和效率的指标来量化情绪元认知。通过 Spearman 相关分析,观察到 meta-d'、M-ratio 和 M-diff 的测试-重测信度,表明在当前设计中情绪元认知的稳定性。本研究揭示了一种量化情绪元认知的有效程序,可扩展用于评估其他主观感受的元认知。然而,需要谨慎解释,因为所测量的过程可能受到非元认知因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/159f913a55eb/41598_2023_49709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/90b0186605a4/41598_2023_49709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/3eca99ace76f/41598_2023_49709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/159f913a55eb/41598_2023_49709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/90b0186605a4/41598_2023_49709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/3eca99ace76f/41598_2023_49709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b113/10805884/159f913a55eb/41598_2023_49709_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring quantitative measures in metacognition of emotion.探索情绪元认知的定量测量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):1990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49709-7.
2
Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain.跨感觉模式的元认知:视觉、温度和伤害性疼痛。
Cognition. 2019 May;186:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Influence of emotional stimuli on metacognition: A study in arithmetic.情绪刺激对元认知的影响:一项算术研究。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Nov;106:103430. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103430. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
4
Metacognition in functional cognitive disorder.功能性认知障碍中的元认知
Brain Commun. 2022 Feb 22;4(2):fcac041. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac041. eCollection 2022.
5
HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings.HMeta-d:基于信心评级的元认知效率分层贝叶斯估计
Neurosci Conscious. 2017 Apr 22;2017(1):nix007. doi: 10.1093/nc/nix007. eCollection 2017.
6
Metacognition and sense of agency.元认知与能动感。
Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105622. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105622. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Metacognition of emotional face recognition.情绪面孔识别的元认知。
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):896-906. doi: 10.1037/a0023746.
8
Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models.信号检测理论模型的元认知测量。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Dec;18(4):535-52. doi: 10.1037/a0033268. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
The influence of irrelevant emotionally negative stimuli on early and late retrospective metacognitive judgements.无关情绪性负性刺激对早期和晚期回溯元认知判断的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):1113-1124. doi: 10.1177/17470218231191516. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
10
Are the contributions of processing experience and prior beliefs to confidence ratings domain-general or domain-specific?加工经验和先验信念对信心评级的影响是领域通用的还是领域特定的?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):28-44. doi: 10.1037/xge0001257. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The subjective experience of emotion: a fearful view.情感的主观体验:一种可怕的观点。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Reliable, rapid, and remote measurement of metacognitive bias.可靠、快速、远程测量元认知偏差。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):14941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64900-0.
3
Do I look like I'm sure?: Partial metacognitive access to the low-level aspects of one's own facial expressions.我看起来有把握吗?:对自身面部表情低水平特征的部分元认知访问。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105155. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105155. Epub 2022 May 7.
4
Can Feelings "Feel" Wrong? Similarities Between Counter-Normative Emotion Reports and Perceptual Errors.感觉会“感觉”错吗?反规范情绪报告与感知错误之间的相似性。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jun;33(6):948-956. doi: 10.1177/09567976211063915. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Aesthetics: It's beautiful to me.美学:我觉得它很美。
Curr Biol. 2022 Apr 25;32(8):R378-R379. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.002.
6
The actor's insight: Actors have comparable interoception but better metacognition than nonactors.演员的洞察力:演员的内感受能力与非演员相当,但元认知能力更好。
Emotion. 2022 Oct;22(7):1544-1553. doi: 10.1037/emo0001080. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
7
The respiratory resistance sensitivity task: An automated method for quantifying respiratory interoception and metacognition.呼吸阻力敏感性任务:一种量化呼吸内感受和元认知的自动化方法。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108325. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108325. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
8
"Taste typicality" is a foundational and multi-modal dimension of ordinary aesthetic experience.“味觉典型性”是日常审美体验的一个基础且多模态的维度。
Curr Biol. 2022 Apr 25;32(8):1837-1842.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.039. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
Putting the "mental" back in "mental disorders": a perspective from research on fear and anxiety.将“心理”因素回归到“精神障碍”之中:来自恐惧与焦虑研究的视角
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;27(3):1322-1330. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01395-5. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
10
The heart rate discrimination task: A psychophysical method to estimate the accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs.心率辨别任务:一种用于估计内感受信念准确性和精确性的心理物理学方法。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Feb;168:108239. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108239. Epub 2021 Dec 11.