文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

深度学习脓毒症预测模型对医疗质量和生存率的影响。

Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.

作者信息

Boussina Aaron, Shashikumar Supreeth P, Malhotra Atul, Owens Robert L, El-Kareh Robert, Longhurst Christopher A, Quintero Kimberly, Donahue Allison, Chan Theodore C, Nemati Shamim, Wardi Gabriel

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Quality, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jan 23;7(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6.


DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6
PMID:38263386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805720/
Abstract

Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Algorithms that assist with the early recognition of sepsis may improve outcomes, but relatively few studies have examined their impact on real-world patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact of a deep-learning model (COMPOSER) for the early prediction of sepsis on patient outcomes. We completed a before-and-after quasi-experimental study at two distinct Emergency Departments (EDs) within the UC San Diego Health System. We included 6217 adult septic patients from 1/1/2021 through 4/30/2023. The exposure tested was a nurse-facing Best Practice Advisory (BPA) triggered by COMPOSER. In-hospital mortality, sepsis bundle compliance, 72-h change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score following sepsis onset, ICU-free days, and the number of ICU encounters were evaluated in the pre-intervention period (705 days) and the post-intervention period (145 days). The causal impact analysis was performed using a Bayesian structural time-series approach with confounder adjustments to assess the significance of the exposure at the 95% confidence level. The deployment of COMPOSER was significantly associated with a 1.9% absolute reduction (17% relative decrease) in in-hospital sepsis mortality (95% CI, 0.3%-3.5%), a 5.0% absolute increase (10% relative increase) in sepsis bundle compliance (95% CI, 2.4%-8.0%), and a 4% (95% CI, 1.1%-7.1%) reduction in 72-h SOFA change after sepsis onset in causal inference analysis. This study suggests that the deployment of COMPOSER for early prediction of sepsis was associated with a significant reduction in mortality and a significant increase in sepsis bundle compliance.

摘要

脓毒症仍然是全球范围内导致死亡和发病的主要原因。有助于早期识别脓毒症的算法可能会改善治疗结果,但相对较少的研究考察了它们对实际患者治疗结果的影响。我们的目标是评估一种用于早期预测脓毒症的深度学习模型(COMPOSER)对患者治疗结果的影响。我们在加州大学圣地亚哥分校医疗系统内的两个不同急诊科完成了一项前后对照的准实验研究。我们纳入了2021年1月1日至2023年4月30日期间的6217名成年脓毒症患者。所测试的暴露因素是由COMPOSER触发的面向护士的最佳实践建议(BPA)。在干预前期(705天)和干预后期(145天)评估了住院死亡率、脓毒症集束依从性、脓毒症发作后序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的72小时变化、无ICU天数以及ICU就诊次数。采用贝叶斯结构时间序列方法并进行混杂因素调整进行因果影响分析,以评估在95%置信水平下暴露因素的显著性。COMPOSER的应用与住院脓毒症死亡率绝对降低1.9%(相对降低17%)(95%CI,0.3%-3.5%)、脓毒症集束依从性绝对增加5.0%(相对增加10%)(95%CI,2.4%-8.0%)以及因果推断分析中脓毒症发作后72小时SOFA变化降低4%(95%CI,1.1%-7.1%)显著相关。这项研究表明,应用COMPOSER进行脓毒症的早期预测与死亡率显著降低和脓毒症集束依从性显著提高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/bdd93274ad8d/41746_2023_986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/3ab57ada503c/41746_2023_986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/972ba13824f4/41746_2023_986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/bdd93274ad8d/41746_2023_986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/3ab57ada503c/41746_2023_986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/972ba13824f4/41746_2023_986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.

NPJ Digit Med. 2024-1-23

[2]
Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023-11-13

[3]
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.

Qatar Med J. 2019-11-7

[4]
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.

J Intensive Care Med. 2020-8

[5]
Evaluating the impact of severe sepsis 3-hour bundle compliance on 28-day in-hospital mortality: A propensity adjusted, nested case-control study.

Pharmacotherapy. 2022-8

[6]
Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management With Mortality Among Patients With Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis.

JAMA Intern Med. 2020-5-1

[7]
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.

JAMA. 2008-5-21

[8]
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

JAMA. 2016-2-23

[9]
Relationship Between a Sepsis Intervention Bundle and In-Hospital Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.

Anesth Analg. 2017-8

[10]
Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say "I don't know".

NPJ Digit Med. 2021-9-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.

Crit Care Res Pract. 2025-8-28

[2]
From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.

Clin Exp Med. 2025-8-21

[3]
Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.

Crit Care. 2025-8-19

[4]
Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-7-28

[5]
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.

Viruses. 2025-6-23

[6]
Mortality and antibiotic timing in deep learning-derived surviving sepsis campaign risk groups: a multicenter study.

Crit Care. 2025-7-14

[7]
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Intensive Care Medicine: Critical Recalibrations from Rule-Based Systems to Frontier Models.

J Clin Med. 2025-6-6

[8]
Can we predict the future of respiratory failure prediction?

Crit Care. 2025-6-19

[9]
Leveraging machine learning in nursing: innovations, challenges, and ethical insights.

Front Digit Health. 2025-5-23

[10]
Quantifying Healthcare Provider Perceptions of a Novel Deep Learning Algorithm to Predict Sepsis: Electronic Survey.

Crit Care Explor. 2025-6-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Predicting Hospital Readmission among Patients with Sepsis Using Clinical and Wearable Data.

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023-7

[2]
Development & Deployment of a Real-time Healthcare Predictive Analytics Platform.

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023-7

[3]
Bringing the Promise of Artificial Intelligence to Critical Care: What the Experience With Sepsis Analytics Can Teach Us.

Crit Care Med. 2023-8-1

[4]
Factors Associated With Variability in the Performance of a Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model Across 9 Networked Hospitals in the US.

JAMA Intern Med. 2023-6-1

[5]
Bending the patient safety curve: how much can AI help?

NPJ Digit Med. 2023-1-4

[6]
Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

World J Surg. 2022-12

[7]
Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis.

Nat Med. 2022-7

[8]
Leveraging clinical data across healthcare institutions for continual learning of predictive risk models.

Sci Rep. 2022-5-19

[9]
Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say "I don't know".

NPJ Digit Med. 2021-9-9

[10]
A Locally Optimized Data-Driven Tool to Predict Sepsis-Associated Vasopressor Use in the ICU.

Crit Care Med. 2021-12-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索