• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习脓毒症预测模型对医疗质量和生存率的影响。

Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.

作者信息

Boussina Aaron, Shashikumar Supreeth P, Malhotra Atul, Owens Robert L, El-Kareh Robert, Longhurst Christopher A, Quintero Kimberly, Donahue Allison, Chan Theodore C, Nemati Shamim, Wardi Gabriel

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Quality, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jan 23;7(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6
PMID:38263386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805720/
Abstract

Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Algorithms that assist with the early recognition of sepsis may improve outcomes, but relatively few studies have examined their impact on real-world patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact of a deep-learning model (COMPOSER) for the early prediction of sepsis on patient outcomes. We completed a before-and-after quasi-experimental study at two distinct Emergency Departments (EDs) within the UC San Diego Health System. We included 6217 adult septic patients from 1/1/2021 through 4/30/2023. The exposure tested was a nurse-facing Best Practice Advisory (BPA) triggered by COMPOSER. In-hospital mortality, sepsis bundle compliance, 72-h change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score following sepsis onset, ICU-free days, and the number of ICU encounters were evaluated in the pre-intervention period (705 days) and the post-intervention period (145 days). The causal impact analysis was performed using a Bayesian structural time-series approach with confounder adjustments to assess the significance of the exposure at the 95% confidence level. The deployment of COMPOSER was significantly associated with a 1.9% absolute reduction (17% relative decrease) in in-hospital sepsis mortality (95% CI, 0.3%-3.5%), a 5.0% absolute increase (10% relative increase) in sepsis bundle compliance (95% CI, 2.4%-8.0%), and a 4% (95% CI, 1.1%-7.1%) reduction in 72-h SOFA change after sepsis onset in causal inference analysis. This study suggests that the deployment of COMPOSER for early prediction of sepsis was associated with a significant reduction in mortality and a significant increase in sepsis bundle compliance.

摘要

脓毒症仍然是全球范围内导致死亡和发病的主要原因。有助于早期识别脓毒症的算法可能会改善治疗结果,但相对较少的研究考察了它们对实际患者治疗结果的影响。我们的目标是评估一种用于早期预测脓毒症的深度学习模型(COMPOSER)对患者治疗结果的影响。我们在加州大学圣地亚哥分校医疗系统内的两个不同急诊科完成了一项前后对照的准实验研究。我们纳入了2021年1月1日至2023年4月30日期间的6217名成年脓毒症患者。所测试的暴露因素是由COMPOSER触发的面向护士的最佳实践建议(BPA)。在干预前期(705天)和干预后期(145天)评估了住院死亡率、脓毒症集束依从性、脓毒症发作后序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的72小时变化、无ICU天数以及ICU就诊次数。采用贝叶斯结构时间序列方法并进行混杂因素调整进行因果影响分析,以评估在95%置信水平下暴露因素的显著性。COMPOSER的应用与住院脓毒症死亡率绝对降低1.9%(相对降低17%)(95%CI,0.3%-3.5%)、脓毒症集束依从性绝对增加5.0%(相对增加10%)(95%CI,2.4%-8.0%)以及因果推断分析中脓毒症发作后72小时SOFA变化降低4%(95%CI,1.1%-7.1%)显著相关。这项研究表明,应用COMPOSER进行脓毒症的早期预测与死亡率显著降低和脓毒症集束依从性显著提高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/bdd93274ad8d/41746_2023_986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/3ab57ada503c/41746_2023_986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/972ba13824f4/41746_2023_986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/bdd93274ad8d/41746_2023_986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/3ab57ada503c/41746_2023_986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/972ba13824f4/41746_2023_986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/10805720/b858c7989d0e/41746_2023_986_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.深度学习脓毒症预测模型对医疗质量和生存率的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jan 23;7(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6.
2
Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.质量改进项目对非重症监护病房患者脓毒症集束化治疗依从性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列前后对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 13;10:1215341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341. eCollection 2023.
3
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
4
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估组件评分预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0885066618795400. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
Evaluating the impact of severe sepsis 3-hour bundle compliance on 28-day in-hospital mortality: A propensity adjusted, nested case-control study.评价严重脓毒症 3 小时bundle 依从性对 28 天住院病死率的影响:倾向评分调整的嵌套病例对照研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Aug;42(8):651-658. doi: 10.1002/phar.2715. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management With Mortality Among Patients With Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis.早期脓毒症管理护理包与医院获得性或社区获得性脓毒症患者死亡率的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):707-716. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0183.
7
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
Relationship Between a Sepsis Intervention Bundle and In-Hospital Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.脓毒症干预集束与住院患者院内死亡率之间的关系:基于真实世界数据的回顾性分析
Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):507-513. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002085.
10
Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say "I don't know".人工智能败血症预测算法学会说“我不知道”。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 9;4(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.探索人工智能在重症监护病房脓毒症管理中的潜力。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Aug 28;2025:9031137. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/9031137. eCollection 2025.
2
From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.从心脏损伤到组学特征:脓毒症性心肌病生物标志物的叙述性综述
Clin Exp Med. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01842-5.
3
Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Hospital Readmission among Patients with Sepsis Using Clinical and Wearable Data.利用临床和可穿戴数据预测脓毒症患者的住院再入院率。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10341165.
2
Development & Deployment of a Real-time Healthcare Predictive Analytics Platform.实时医疗保健预测分析平台的开发与部署。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340351.
3
Bringing the Promise of Artificial Intelligence to Critical Care: What the Experience With Sepsis Analytics Can Teach Us.
变革脓毒症管理:人工智能驱动的早期检测与个性化治疗创新
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05588-0.
4
Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.细菌大战:人工智能在脓毒症管理中卷土重来
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;15(15):1890. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151890.
5
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.用于传染病监测、诊断和预后的机器学习与人工智能
Viruses. 2025 Jun 23;17(7):882. doi: 10.3390/v17070882.
6
Mortality and antibiotic timing in deep learning-derived surviving sepsis campaign risk groups: a multicenter study.深度学习衍生的脓毒症存活运动风险组中的死亡率与抗生素使用时机:一项多中心研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 14;29(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05493-6.
7
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Intensive Care Medicine: Critical Recalibrations from Rule-Based Systems to Frontier Models.重症监护医学中的机器学习与人工智能:从基于规则的系统到前沿模型的关键重新校准
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4026. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124026.
8
Can we predict the future of respiratory failure prediction?我们能否预测呼吸衰竭预测的未来?
Crit Care. 2025 Jun 19;29(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05484-7.
9
Leveraging machine learning in nursing: innovations, challenges, and ethical insights.护理领域中机器学习的应用:创新、挑战与伦理洞察。
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 23;7:1514133. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1514133. eCollection 2025.
10
Quantifying Healthcare Provider Perceptions of a Novel Deep Learning Algorithm to Predict Sepsis: Electronic Survey.量化医疗服务提供者对一种用于预测脓毒症的新型深度学习算法的看法:电子调查。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jun 4;7(6):e1276. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001276. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
将人工智能的前景带入重症监护:脓毒症分析的经验能给我们带来什么启示。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;51(8):985-991. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005894. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Factors Associated With Variability in the Performance of a Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model Across 9 Networked Hospitals in the US.美国9家联网医院中,与一种专利脓毒症预测模型性能变异性相关的因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):611-612. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182.
5
Bending the patient safety curve: how much can AI help?扭转患者安全曲线:人工智能能有多大帮助?
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00731-5.
6
Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.机器学习算法在预测结直肠手术后手术结局中的应用:系统综述。
World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):3100-3110. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06728-1. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis.采用 TREWS 机器学习为基础的脓毒症早期预警系统后,对患者预后的前瞻性、多中心研究。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1455-1460. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
8
Leveraging clinical data across healthcare institutions for continual learning of predictive risk models.利用医疗机构之间的临床数据,不断学习预测风险模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12497-7.
9
Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say "I don't know".人工智能败血症预测算法学会说“我不知道”。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 9;4(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6.
10
A Locally Optimized Data-Driven Tool to Predict Sepsis-Associated Vasopressor Use in the ICU.一种局部优化的数据驱动工具,用于预测 ICU 中与败血症相关的血管加压药使用。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):e1196-e1205. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005175.