Suppr超能文献

基于 CNN-LSTM 的深度学习模型具有高精度和强鲁棒性的碳价预测:以中国深圳碳市场为例。

A CNN-LSTM based deep learning model with high accuracy and robustness for carbon price forecasting: A case of Shenzhen's carbon market in China.

机构信息

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710127, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:120131. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120131. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Abstract

Accurately predicting carbon trading prices using deep learning models can help enterprises understand the operational mechanisms and regulations of the carbon market. This is crucial for expanding the industries covered by the carbon market and ensuring its stable and healthy development. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the predictions in practical applications, it is important to evaluate the model's robustness. In this paper, we built models with different parameters to predict carbon trading prices, and proposed models with high accuracy and robustness. The accuracy of the models was assessed using traditional survey indicators. The robustness of the CNN-LSTM model was compared to that of the LSTM model using Z-scores. The CNN-LSTM model with the best prediction performance was compared to a single LSTM model, resulting in a 9% reduction in MSE and a 0.0133 shortening of the Z-score range. Furthermore, the CNN-LSTM model achieved a level of accuracy comparable to other popular models such as CEEMDAN, Boosting, and GRU. It also demonstrated a training speed improvement of at least 40% compared to the aforementioned methods. These results suggest that the CNN-LSTM enhances model resilience. Moreover, the practicality of using Z-score to evaluate model robustness is confirmed.

摘要

利用深度学习模型准确预测碳交易价格,可以帮助企业了解碳市场的运作机制和规则。这对于扩大碳市场覆盖的行业和确保其稳定健康发展至关重要。为了确保实际应用中预测的准确性和可靠性,评估模型的稳健性很重要。在本文中,我们构建了具有不同参数的模型来预测碳交易价格,并提出了具有高精度和稳健性的模型。使用传统的调查指标评估了模型的准确性。使用 Z 分数比较了 CNN-LSTM 模型和 LSTM 模型的稳健性。将具有最佳预测性能的 CNN-LSTM 模型与单个 LSTM 模型进行了比较,结果表明 MSE 降低了 9%,Z 分数范围缩短了 0.0133。此外,CNN-LSTM 模型的准确性可与 CEEMDAN、Boosting 和 GRU 等其他流行模型相媲美。与上述方法相比,它还至少提高了 40%的训练速度。这些结果表明,CNN-LSTM 增强了模型的弹性。此外,还证实了使用 Z 分数评估模型稳健性的实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验