• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于环境和健康研究的无人机使用的伦理考虑:范围综述方案。

Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: A scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0287270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287270. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287270
PMID:38295017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10829986/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of drones in environment and health research is a relatively new phenomenon. A principal research activity drones are used for is environmental monitoring, which can raise concerns in local communities. Existing ethical guidance for researchers is often not specific to drone technology and practices vary between research settings. Therefore, this scoping review aims to gather the evidence available on ethical considerations surrounding drone use as perceived by local communities, ethical considerations reported on by researchers implementing drone research, and published ethical guidance related to drone deployment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. The literature search will be conducted using academic databases and grey literature sources. After pilot testing the inclusion criteria and data extraction tool, two researchers will double-screen and then chart available evidence independently. A content analysis will be carried out to identify patterns of categories or terms used to describe ethical considerations related to drone usage for environmental monitoring in the literature using the R Package RQDA. Discrepancies in any phase of the project will be solved through consensus between the two reviewers. If consensus cannot be reached, a third arbitrator will be consulted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required; only secondary data will be used. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/a78et). The results will be disseminated through publication in a scientific journal and will be used to inform drone field campaigns in the Wellcome Trust funded HARMONIZE project. HARMONIZE aims to develop cost-effective and reproducible digital infrastructure for stakeholders in climate change hotspots in Latin America & the Caribbean and will use drone technology to collect data on fine scale landscape changes.

摘要

简介

无人机在环境和健康研究中的应用是一个相对较新的现象。无人机主要用于环境监测,这可能会引起当地社区的关注。现有的研究人员伦理准则通常不适用于无人机技术,而且不同的研究环境之间的实践也存在差异。因此,本范围综述旨在收集有关当地社区对无人机使用的伦理考虑的现有证据、研究人员在实施无人机研究时报告的伦理考虑以及与无人机部署相关的已发表的伦理准则。

方法和分析

本范围综述将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)和 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)指南。文献检索将使用学术数据库和灰色文献来源进行。在试点测试纳入标准和数据提取工具后,两名研究人员将独立地进行双重筛选和图表记录。将使用 R 包 RQDA 对文献中与环境监测相关的无人机使用的伦理考虑进行内容分析,以识别用于描述这些伦理考虑的类别或术语的模式。在项目的任何阶段,如果出现分歧,将通过两位评审员之间的共识来解决。如果无法达成共识,则将咨询第三位仲裁员。

伦理和传播

不需要伦理批准;仅使用二级数据。本方案在开放科学框架(osf.io/a78et)上注册。结果将通过在科学期刊上发表来传播,并将用于为惠康信托基金资助的 HARMONIZE 项目中的无人机实地活动提供信息。HARMONIZE 旨在为拉丁美洲和加勒比地区气候变化热点的利益相关者开发具有成本效益和可复制的数字基础设施,并将使用无人机技术收集有关小尺度景观变化的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a04/10829986/7bb9f86f55f1/pone.0287270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a04/10829986/7bb9f86f55f1/pone.0287270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a04/10829986/7bb9f86f55f1/pone.0287270.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: A scoping review protocol.用于环境和健康研究的无人机使用的伦理考虑:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0287270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287270. eCollection 2024.
2
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Use of machine learning in occupational risk communication for healthcare workers: protocol for scoping review.机器学习在医护人员职业风险沟通中的应用:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e088729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088729.
5
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
6
Locating the built environment within existing empirical models of climate change and mental health: protocol for a global systematic scoping review.在气候变化与心理健康的现有实证模型中定位建成环境:一项全球系统性综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 2;15(4):e093222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093222.
7
Exploring the effects of climate change on child malnutrition: protocol for a scoping review.探索气候变化对儿童营养不良的影响:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e090285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090285.
8
Measurement of climate change-related food (in)security and food sovereignty in Canada's northern communities and the circumpolar region: a scoping review protocol.测量加拿大北部社区和环极地区与气候变化相关的粮食(不安全)和粮食主权:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e084403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084403.
9
Efforts to strengthen anatomic pathology diagnostic services for cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区癌症解剖病理学诊断服务的努力:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e089425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089425.
10
Financial toxicity in patients with lung cancer: a scoping review protocol.肺癌患者的财务毒性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e057801. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057801.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical considerations of public health surveillance in the age of the internet of things technologies: A perspective.物联网技术时代公共卫生监测的伦理考量:一种视角
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 5;10:20552076241296578. doi: 10.1177/20552076241296578. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Using image segmentation models to analyse high-resolution earth observation data: new tools to monitor disease risks in changing environments.利用图像分割模型分析高分辨率地球观测数据:监测变化环境中疾病风险的新工具。
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 May 19;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12942-024-00371-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveillance and control of vectors of malaria and other vector-borne diseases.用于监测和控制疟疾等媒介传播疾病的媒介的无人机。
Malar J. 2023 Jan 20;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04414-0.
2
The use of drones for mosquito surveillance and control.利用无人机进行蚊虫监测与控制。
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Dec 16;15(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05580-5.
3
Effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) delivery on blood product delivery time and wastage in Rwanda: a retrospective, cross-sectional study and time series analysis.
卢旺达无人机(无人机)投递对血液制品投递时间和浪费的影响:回顾性、横断面研究和时间序列分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Apr;10(4):e564-e569. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00048-1.
4
Ethical Considerations Associated with "Humanitarian Drones": A Scoping Literature Review.与“人道主义无人机”相关的伦理问题:范围界定文献综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 3;27(4):51. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00327-4.
5
The application of drones for mosquito larval habitat identification in rural environments: a practical approach for malaria control?将无人机应用于农村环境中的蚊虫幼虫栖息地识别:疟疾控制的实用方法?
Malar J. 2021 May 31;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03759-2.
6
An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare.用于公共医疗的无人机的设计、开发、实施和评估的伦理框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2867-2891. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00233-1. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.《人工智能造福人类——良好人工智能社会的伦理框架:机遇、风险、原则与建议》
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
10
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.