• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农民专业合作社对每个成员公平吗?基于社员服务利用水平的新视角。

Has the agricultural cooperatives served each member fairly? A new perspective based on utilization level of member services.

机构信息

College of Business Administration, Sichuan Vocational College of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0294439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294439. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0294439
PMID:38295086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10830000/
Abstract

With the rapid increase of the number of agricultural cooperatives in China, the problem of fake cooperatives has become more and more serious. The core problem is that some members do not use cooperative services, and elite capture phenomenon appears in the organization. Since services are one of the most important public goods attributes of cooperatives, it is important to ensure that more members use them. What are the factors that affect members' utilization level of cooperative services? Existing research does not provide a comprehensive answer. Based on the micro-survey data of 74 citrus cooperatives and 524 citrus members in China, the article found out that 50.9% of the members did not use any services provided by cooperatives, and only 20.04% of the members used cooperatives' sales services. So, this study empirically analyzes the factors that influence the use of cooperatives' services by puns model. The results show that quality of service, service convenience and mountain terrain promote the use of cooperative sales services for members. In addition, cooperative knowledge, planting area, surplus distribution, quality of service, and service convenience significantly increased the utilization leve of cooperative sales services by members. Finally, the study puts forward some suggestions, such as propagating cooperative sales service, improving the quality of cooperative sales service, perfecting cooperative distribution system.

摘要

随着中国农业合作社数量的快速增加,假合作社的问题越来越严重。核心问题是一些成员不使用合作社服务,组织中出现了精英捕获现象。由于服务是合作社最重要的公共物品属性之一,因此确保更多成员使用服务非常重要。影响成员对合作社服务利用水平的因素有哪些?现有研究并没有给出全面的答案。基于中国 74 个柑橘合作社和 524 名柑橘成员的微观调查数据,本文发现 50.9%的成员没有使用合作社提供的任何服务,只有 20.04%的成员使用合作社的销售服务。因此,本研究通过实证分析 Pun 模型来研究影响合作社服务使用的因素。结果表明,服务质量、服务便利性和山地地形促进了成员对合作社销售服务的使用。此外,合作社知识、种植面积、盈余分配、服务质量和服务便利性显著提高了成员对合作社销售服务的利用水平。最后,研究提出了一些建议,如宣传合作社销售服务、提高合作社销售服务质量、完善合作社分配制度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/10830000/24b0cad69583/pone.0294439.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/10830000/24b0cad69583/pone.0294439.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/10830000/24b0cad69583/pone.0294439.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Has the agricultural cooperatives served each member fairly? A new perspective based on utilization level of member services.农民专业合作社对每个成员公平吗?基于社员服务利用水平的新视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0294439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294439. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on the Impact of Members' Social Capital within Agricultural Cooperatives on Their Adoption of IPM in China.研究中国农业合作社成员的社会资本对其采用 IPM 的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11538. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811538.
3
The Effect of Technical Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers' Adoption of Organic Fertilizers in China: Based on the Mediation Role of Ability and Perception.农业合作社提供的技术培训对中国农民采纳有机肥的影响:基于能力和感知的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114277.
4
Estimating effects of cooperative membership on farmers' safe production behaviors: evidence from the rice sector in China.评估合作社成员身份对农民安全生产行为的影响:来自中国水稻部门的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25400-25418. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12337-z. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Community cooperatives and insecticide-treated materials for malaria control: a new experience in Latin America.用于疟疾控制的社区合作社与经杀虫剂处理的材料:拉丁美洲的新经验。
Malar J. 2002 Nov 15;1:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-1-15.
6
A prosperous agricultural co-operative of households with fewer births.
China Popul Today. 1993 Apr;10(2):17-8.
7
Analyzing the Relationship among Social Capital, Dynamic Capability, and Farmers' Cooperative Performance Using Lightweight Deep Learning Model: A Case Study of Liaoning Province.利用轻量级深度学习模型分析社会资本、动态能力与农民合作社绩效之间的关系——以辽宁省为例
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Mar 1;2023:7064236. doi: 10.1155/2023/7064236. eCollection 2023.
8
Research on the Influence of Education of Farmers' Cooperatives on the Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technologies by Members: Evidence from Rural China.农民合作社教育对社员采纳绿色防控技术的影响研究——来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106255.
9
Member commitment in farmers' cooperatives in China: The role of contractual and relational governance mechanisms.中国农民合作社成员的承诺:契约和关系治理机制的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0288925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288925. eCollection 2023.
10
Do cooperatives exclude small-scale farming households? Evidence from Fuchuan County, Guangxi Province.合作社是否排斥小规模农户?来自广西富川县的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0272150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272150. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
How do cooperative rebates and asset specificity impact operating performance of farmer cooperatives? evidence from China.合作返利和资产专用性如何影响农民合作社的经营绩效?来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0313483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313483. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Study on the Impact of Ideological and Political Education of Ecological Civilization on College Students' Willingness to Act Pro-Environment: Evidence from China.生态文明思想政治教育对大学生环境行为意愿的影响研究——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032608.
2
Farmers' cognition of the COVID-19 outbreak, risk perception and willingness of green production.农民对新冠疫情的认知、风险感知及绿色生产意愿
J Clean Prod. 2022 Dec 20;380:135068. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135068. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
External Supervision, Face Consciousness, and Pesticide Safety Use: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.
外部监督、面子意识与农药安全使用——来自中国四川省的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 8;19(12):7013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127013.
4
Research on the Influence of Education of Farmers' Cooperatives on the Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technologies by Members: Evidence from Rural China.农民合作社教育对社员采纳绿色防控技术的影响研究——来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106255.
5
Biological yields through agricultural extension activities and services: A case study from Al-Baha region - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.通过农业推广活动和服务实现的生物产量:沙特阿拉伯王国巴哈地区的案例研究
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May;28(5):2789-2794. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Factors influencing farmers' satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services.影响农民对农业推广服务质量满意度的因素。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Apr;85:101912. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101912. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
7
Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare.推广服务的可及性与合作社成员身份对技术采用及家庭福利的影响。
J Rural Stud. 2017 Aug;54:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022.
8
Welfare impacts of improved chickpea adoption: A pathway for rural development in Ethiopia?鹰嘴豆种植改良的福利影响:埃塞俄比亚农村发展的一条途径?
Food Policy. 2017 Jan;66:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007.