• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农民对新冠疫情的认知、风险感知及绿色生产意愿

Farmers' cognition of the COVID-19 outbreak, risk perception and willingness of green production.

作者信息

Luo Lei, Qiao Dakuan, Wang Lishuang, Qiu Ling, Liu Yuying, Fu Xinhong

机构信息

School of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, China.

Sichuan Rural Development Research Center, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Clean Prod. 2022 Dec 20;380:135068. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135068. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135068
PMID:36377229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637231/
Abstract

Existing literature reports that COVID-19 outbreak may affect people's risk perceptions, with disturbances ranging from mild negative emotional reactions to overall mental health. At the same time, the pneumonia pandemic reveals all the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of our ecosystem and makes people reflect on traditional ecologically harmful production practices. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to review the existing scientific literature on these variables, through a survey and empirical analysis, in order to present and comment on the effects and mechanisms of influence between them. The results showed that: (1) Increasing farmers'cognition of COVID-19 outbreak could significantly enhance the green production willingness. Specifically, the probability of "Very willing"to participate in green production increased by 29.9% for each unit of increase in cognition. (2) Farmers'cognition of COVID-19 outbreak can significantly enhance the level of risk perception and thus enhance their green production willingness, that is, risk perception is an important transmission medium of this effect. (3)The analysis of inter-generational difference showed that the impact of cognition of COVID-19 outbreak on green production willingness was significant for both the new generation and the old generation. On the basis of this, some policy suggestions are put forward, such as strengthening the propaganda and education of natural ecological environment protection, establishing the propaganda mechanism of green agricultural products market in the later period of epidemic situation, raising farmers'risk perception level through multi-channels and so on.

摘要

现有文献报道,新冠疫情爆发可能会影响人们的风险认知,干扰范围从轻微的负面情绪反应到整体心理健康。与此同时,肺炎大流行揭示了我们生态系统的所有脆弱性和弱点,促使人们反思传统的生态有害生产方式。因此,本文旨在通过调查和实证分析,回顾关于这些变量的现有科学文献,以便呈现并评论它们之间的影响效果和机制。结果表明:(1)提高农民对新冠疫情爆发的认知能显著增强绿色生产意愿。具体而言,认知每提高一个单位,“非常愿意”参与绿色生产的概率增加29.9%。(2)农民对新冠疫情爆发的认知能显著提高风险认知水平,进而增强其绿色生产意愿,即风险认知是这种影响的重要传导媒介。(3)代际差异分析表明,新冠疫情爆发认知对绿色生产意愿的影响在新一代和老一代中均显著。在此基础上,提出了一些政策建议,如加强自然生态环境保护宣传教育、在疫情后期建立绿色农产品市场宣传机制、通过多渠道提高农民风险认知水平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e23/9637231/a20a144487e4/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e23/9637231/3135d8d76862/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e23/9637231/a20a144487e4/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e23/9637231/3135d8d76862/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e23/9637231/a20a144487e4/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Farmers' cognition of the COVID-19 outbreak, risk perception and willingness of green production.农民对新冠疫情的认知、风险感知及绿色生产意愿
J Clean Prod. 2022 Dec 20;380:135068. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135068. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
2
Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers' Green Production in Hainan, China.意愿与行为之间的差距:理解中国海南农民绿色生产的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811351.
3
Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions.从农民认知角度看影响农业绿色生产意愿的因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:140289. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140289. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Driving mechanism of farmers' green production behavior under normalization of COVID-19 prevention and control: A case study in China.常态化疫情防控下农户绿色生产行为的驱动机制——基于中国的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:826846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.826846. eCollection 2022.
5
Research on the Green Production Motivation of New Agricultural Business Entities: Benefit Perception and Environmental Regulation.新型农业经营主体绿色生产动机研究:收益感知与环境规制。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;2022:9182725. doi: 10.1155/2022/9182725. eCollection 2022.
6
Farmers' adoption of agriculture green production technologies: perceived value or policy-driven?农民对农业绿色生产技术的采用:感知价值还是政策驱动?
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23925. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23925. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
7
Mismatches in Suppliers' and Demanders' Cognition, Willingness and Behavior with Respect to Ecological Protection of Cultivated Land: Evidence from Caidian District, Wuhan, China.供应商和需求者在耕地生态保护方面的认知、意愿和行为存在错位:来自中国武汉蔡甸区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041156.
8
Place attachment, environmental cognition and organic fertilizer adoption of farmers: evidence from rural China.农民的地方依恋、环境认知与有机肥采纳——来自中国农村的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(30):41255-41267. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13509-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Effect of Farmers' Awareness of Climate Change on Their Willingness to Adopt Low-Carbon Production: Based on the TAM-SOR Model.气候变化认知对农民采纳低碳生产意愿的影响——基于 TAM-SOR 模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010619.
10
Farmers' Willingness to Participate in Agricultural Product Safety Cogovernance and Self-Governance in Jiangsu, China: A Gender Perspective.中国江苏农民参与农产品安全共治和自治的意愿:基于性别的视角
J Food Prot. 2020 May 1;83(5):736-744. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-214.

引用本文的文献

1
How does livelihood capital influence the green production behaviors among professional grain farmers cultivating high-quality rice?生计资本如何影响种植优质水稻的专业粮农的绿色生产行为?
Front Nutr. 2025 May 26;12:1555488. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488. eCollection 2025.
2
How do policy measures affect the ability of poverty-stricken households to cope with external shocks? From the perspective of differences in the human capital endowment of households.政策措施如何影响贫困家庭应对外部冲击的能力?从家庭人力资本禀赋的差异角度。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 31;12:1361303. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1361303. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Driving mechanism of farmers' green production behavior under normalization of COVID-19 prevention and control: A case study in China.常态化疫情防控下农户绿色生产行为的驱动机制——基于中国的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:826846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.826846. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceptions of COVID-19 shocks and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in Ghana.加纳对 COVID-19 冲击的认知与可持续农业实践的采用。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115810. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115810. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
3
Research on the Influence of Education of Farmers' Cooperatives on the Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technologies by Members: Evidence from Rural China.
The impact of environmental education at Chinese Universities on college students' environmental attitudes.
中国高校环境教育对大学生环境态度的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299231. eCollection 2024.
4
Has the agricultural cooperatives served each member fairly? A new perspective based on utilization level of member services.农民专业合作社对每个成员公平吗?基于社员服务利用水平的新视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0294439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294439. eCollection 2024.
5
How risk perception and loss aversion affect farmers' willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads: Mediating role of policy identity.风险认知与损失厌恶如何影响农户退出农村宅基地的意愿:政策认同的中介作用
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 12;9(10):e20918. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20918. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding environmental friendly disinfectants for household use among residents of China in the post-pandemic period.后疫情时期中国居民对家用环保消毒剂的知识、态度和实践。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 13;11:1161339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1161339. eCollection 2023.
7
A Study on the Impact of Ideological and Political Education of Ecological Civilization on College Students' Willingness to Act Pro-Environment: Evidence from China.生态文明思想政治教育对大学生环境行为意愿的影响研究——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032608.
农民合作社教育对社员采纳绿色防控技术的影响研究——来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106255.
4
Global impact of COVID-19 on agriculture: role of sustainable agriculture and digital farming.新冠疫情对农业的全球影响:可持续农业和数字农业的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):42509-42525. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19358-w. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
The Mediating Role of Perceived Social Support Between Resilience and Anxiety 1 Year After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Disparity Between High-Risk and Low-Risk Nurses in China.新冠疫情大流行1年后,感知社会支持在复原力与焦虑之间的中介作用:中国高风险与低风险护士之间的差异
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 24;12:666789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.666789. eCollection 2021.
6
Climate change, environment pollution, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health.气候变化、环境污染、COVID-19 大流行与心理健康。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145182. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145182. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Customers response to online food delivery services during COVID-19 outbreak using binary logistic regression.使用二元逻辑回归分析新冠疫情期间顾客对在线食品配送服务的反应。
Int J Consum Stud. 2021 May;45(3):396-408. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12630. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Corrigendum: Psychological Symptoms During the Two Stages of Lockdown in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Investigation in a Sample of Citizens in Northern Spain.勘误:应对新冠疫情封锁两个阶段的心理症状:对西班牙北部一个公民样本的调查
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 1;11:2116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02116. eCollection 2020.
9
Was the COVID-19 pandemic avoidable? A call for a "solution-oriented" approach in pathogen evolutionary ecology to prevent future outbreaks.新冠大流行是否可以避免?呼吁在病原体进化生态学中采用“以解决方案为导向”的方法,以预防未来的爆发。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Nov;23(11):1557-1560. doi: 10.1111/ele.13586. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources.新冠肺炎疫情期间的心理健康:居家政策、社交距离行为和社会资源的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113419. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419. Epub 2020 Aug 20.