Li Xinyu, Zhang Yuanhao, Liao Yumin, Yu Guanghai
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Intelligent Manufacturing Institute of HFUT, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2.
Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb. In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.
动力电池是电动汽车(EV)的核心部件之一,也是电动汽车环境影响的主要贡献因素,减少其环境排放有助于提高电动汽车的可持续性。基于刚度等效原理,用轻质材料替代动力电池的钢外壳,借助GaBi软件建立生命周期模型,并采用CML2001方法评估其环境影响。结果可总结如下:(1)基于全球变暖潜势(GWP)、酸化潜势(AP)、非生物资源耗竭潜势(ADP(f))和人体毒性潜势(HTP)这四个环境影响类别,轻质材料的环境影响低于钢箱。其中,铝合金箱的降幅最大,碳纤维片状模塑料(CF-SMC)箱次之。(2)在电结构的敏感性分析中,铝合金箱在环境影响方面仍是最优选。(3)在行驶里程的敏感性分析中,铝合金箱体对于车辆寿命也是最佳选择。(4)使用替代因子进行定量评估,衡量了用轻质材料替代钢电池箱后温室气体排放量的减少情况。采用铝合金电池箱可减少1.55吨温室气体排放,替代因子为1.55 tC sb。在复合材料尚未大规模商业化回收的情况下,铝合金仍是电池箱全生命周期综合环境影响的最佳材料之一。