• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高绩效和低绩效县中影响基于社区的院外心脏骤停干预措施实施支持度的因素。

Factors influencing support for the implementation of community-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest interventions in high- and low-performing counties.

作者信息

Ezem Natalie, Lewinski Allison A, Miller Julie, King Heather A, Oakes Megan, Monk Lisa, Starks Monique A, Granger Christopher B, Bosworth Hayden B, Blewer Audrey L

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2024 Jan 20;17:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100550. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100550
PMID:38304635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831164/
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

Survival to hospital discharge from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) after receiving treatment from emergency medical services (EMS) is less than 10% in the United States. Community-focused interventions improve survival rates, but there is limited information on how to gain support for new interventions or program activities within these populations. Using data from the RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems (RACE-CARS) trial, we aimed to identify the factors influencing emergency response agencies' support in implementing an OHCA intervention.

METHODS

North Carolina counties were stratified into high-performing or low-performing counties based on the county's cardiac arrest volume, percent of bystander-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed, patient survival to hospital discharge, cerebral performance in patients after cardiac arrest, and perceived engagement in the RACE-CARS project. We randomly selected 4 high-performing and 3 low-performing counties and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with emergency response stakeholders in each county.

RESULTS

From 10/2021 to 02/2022, we completed 29 interviews across the 7 counties (EMS ( = 9), telecommunications ( = 7), fire/first responders ( = 7), and hospital representatives ( = 6)). We identified three themes salient to community support for OHCA intervention: (1) initiating support at emergency response agencies; (2) obtaining support from emergency response agency staff (senior leadership and emergency response teams); and (3) and maintaining support. For each theme, we described similarities and differences by high- and low-performing county.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified techniques for supporting effective engagement of emergency response agencies in community-based interventions for OHCA improving survival rates. This work may inform future programs and initiatives around implementation of community-based interventions for OHCA.

摘要

研究目的

在美国,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗后存活至出院的比例不到10%。以社区为重点的干预措施可提高存活率,但关于如何在这些人群中获得对新干预措施或项目活动的支持的信息有限。利用心脏骤停系统随机整群评估(RACE-CARS)试验的数据,我们旨在确定影响应急响应机构支持实施OHCA干预措施的因素。

方法

根据各县的心脏骤停病例数、旁观者进行心肺复苏(CPR)的比例、患者存活至出院的情况、心脏骤停后患者的脑功能以及对RACE-CARS项目的参与度,将北卡罗来纳州各县分为表现优秀或表现不佳的县。我们随机选择了4个表现优秀的县和3个表现不佳的县,并对每个县的应急响应利益相关者进行了半结构化定性访谈。

结果

从2021年10月至2022年2月,我们在这7个县完成了29次访谈(EMS人员9名、电信人员7名、消防/急救人员7名、医院代表6名)。我们确定了社区支持OHCA干预措施的三个突出主题:(1)在应急响应机构启动支持;(2)从应急响应机构工作人员(高级领导和应急响应团队)获得支持;(3)维持支持。对于每个主题,我们描述了表现优秀和表现不佳的县之间的异同。

结论

我们确定了支持应急响应机构有效参与基于社区的OHCA干预措施以提高存活率的技术。这项工作可能为未来围绕实施基于社区的OHCA干预措施的项目和倡议提供参考。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing support for the implementation of community-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest interventions in high- and low-performing counties.高绩效和低绩效县中影响基于社区的院外心脏骤停干预措施实施支持度的因素。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jan 20;17:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100550. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance --- Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005--December 31, 2010.院外心脏骤停监测 - 心脏骤停注册以提高存活率 (CARES),美国,2005 年 10 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Jul 29;60(8):1-19.
3
Community first responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults and children.成人及儿童院外心脏骤停的社区第一响应者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012764.pub2.
4
RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems (RACE-CARS) trial: Study rationale and design.RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems (RACE-CARS) 试验:研究原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2024 Nov;277:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
6
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
7
Association of Public Health Initiatives With Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Home and in Public Locations.公共卫生倡议与院外心脏骤停在家中和公共场所结局的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1226-1235. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3471.
8
Incidence, process of care, and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective study of the BASIC-OHCA registry.中国院外心脏骤停的发生率、救治过程和结局:BASIC-OHCA 注册研究的前瞻性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Dec;8(12):e923-e932. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00173-1. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
9
Multistate 5-Year Initiative to Improve Care for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Primary Results From the HeartRescue Project.多州 5 年改善院外心脏骤停救治倡议:HeartRescue 项目的初步结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9):e005716. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005716.
10
Variation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Across Emergency Medical Service Agencies.院外心脏骤停存活率在急救医疗服务机构间的差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jun;15(6):e008755. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008755. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Neighborhood-level out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk and the impact of local CPR interventions.社区层面院外心脏骤停风险及当地心肺复苏干预措施的影响。
Resusc Plus. 2022 Jul 16;11:100274. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100274. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Association of High-Volume Centers With Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高容量中心与非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者生存结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14639.
3
Operationalizing Leadership and Clinician Buy-In to Implement Evidence-Based Tobacco Treatment Programs in Routine Oncology Care: A Mixed-Method Study of the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.将领导力和临床医生的认同付诸实践,以在常规肿瘤学护理中实施基于证据的烟草治疗计划:美国癌症中心戒烟倡议的混合方法研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 29;29(4):2406-2421. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040195.
4
Understanding the Importance of the Lay Responder Experience in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.了解院外心脏骤停中现场急救人员经验的重要性:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2022 Apr 26;145(17):e852-e867. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001054. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Applied Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Contextually Appropriate Intervention and Increase the Likelihood of Uptake.应用快速定性分析来制定一个具有文化适应性的干预措施,从而提高采用的可能性。
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S242-S251. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001553.
7
Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.美国在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间院外心脏骤停的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;6(3):296-303. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6210.
8
Impact of bystander-focused public health interventions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival: a cohort study.旁观者为重点的公共卫生干预措施对心肺复苏术和生存率的影响:一项队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e428-e436. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30140-7.
9
Assessment of Community Interventions for Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估院外心脏骤停旁观者心肺复苏社区干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209256. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9256.
10
Characteristics Associated With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests and Resuscitations During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in New York City.2019 年新型冠状病毒病大流行期间纽约市院外心脏骤停和复苏的特征。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;5(10):1154-1163. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2488.