Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0295562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295562. eCollection 2024.
Positive Appraisal Style Theory of Resilience posits that a person's general style of evaluating stressors plays a central role in mental health and resilience. Specifically, a tendency to appraise stressors positively (positive appraisal style; PAS) is theorized to be protective of mental health and thus a key resilience factor. To this date no measures of PAS exist. Here, we present two scales that measure perceived positive appraisal style, one focusing on cognitive processes that lead to positive appraisals in stressful situations (PASS-process), and the other focusing on the appraisal contents (PASS-content). For PASS-process, the items of the existing questionnaires Brief COPE and CERQ-short were analyzed in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) in independent samples (N = 1157 and N = 1704). The resulting 10-item questionnaire was internally consistent (α = .78, 95% CI [.86, .87]) and showed good convergent and discriminant validity in comparisons with self-report measures of trait optimism, neuroticism, urgency, and spontaneity. For PASS-content, a newly generated item pool of 29 items across stressor appraisal content dimensions (probability, magnitude, and coping potential) were subjected to EFA and CFA in two independent samples (N = 1174 and N = 1611). The resulting 14-item scale showed good internal consistency (α = .87, 95% CI [.86, .87]), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity within the nomological network. The two scales are a new and reliable way to assess self-perceived positive appraisal style in large-scale studies, which could offer key insights into mechanisms of resilience.
积极评价风格理论认为,个体对压力源的一般评价风格在心理健康和适应力中起着核心作用。具体来说,积极评价压力源的倾向(积极评价风格;PAS)被认为对心理健康具有保护作用,因此是适应力的关键因素。迄今为止,尚无 PAS 的测量方法。在这里,我们提出了两种衡量感知积极评价风格的量表,一种侧重于导致在压力情境中积极评价的认知过程(PASS-过程),另一种侧重于评价内容(PASS-内容)。对于 PASS-过程,对现有的Brief COPE 和 CERQ-short 问卷的项目进行了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA、CFA),样本分别为 1157 人和 1704 人。由此产生的 10 项问卷具有内部一致性(α =.78,95%CI [.86,.87]),并且与特质乐观、神经质、紧迫性和自发性的自我报告测量相比具有良好的收敛和区分效度。对于 PASS-内容,新生成的 29 项压力源评价内容维度(可能性、大小和应对潜力)的项目池经过两个独立样本(N = 1174 和 N = 1611)的 EFA 和 CFA。由此产生的 14 项量表具有良好的内部一致性(α =.87,95%CI [.86,.87]),以及在概念网络内具有良好的收敛和区分效度。这两个量表为在大规模研究中评估自我感知的积极评价风格提供了一种新的可靠方法,这可能为适应力的机制提供关键见解。