• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极评价风格的自评评估:为心理健康和韧性研究开发过程导向和内容导向的问卷。

Self-report assessment of Positive Appraisal Style (PAS): Development of a process-focused and a content-focused questionnaire for use in mental health and resilience research.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.

Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0295562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295562. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295562
PMID:38306328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10836662/
Abstract

Positive Appraisal Style Theory of Resilience posits that a person's general style of evaluating stressors plays a central role in mental health and resilience. Specifically, a tendency to appraise stressors positively (positive appraisal style; PAS) is theorized to be protective of mental health and thus a key resilience factor. To this date no measures of PAS exist. Here, we present two scales that measure perceived positive appraisal style, one focusing on cognitive processes that lead to positive appraisals in stressful situations (PASS-process), and the other focusing on the appraisal contents (PASS-content). For PASS-process, the items of the existing questionnaires Brief COPE and CERQ-short were analyzed in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) in independent samples (N = 1157 and N = 1704). The resulting 10-item questionnaire was internally consistent (α = .78, 95% CI [.86, .87]) and showed good convergent and discriminant validity in comparisons with self-report measures of trait optimism, neuroticism, urgency, and spontaneity. For PASS-content, a newly generated item pool of 29 items across stressor appraisal content dimensions (probability, magnitude, and coping potential) were subjected to EFA and CFA in two independent samples (N = 1174 and N = 1611). The resulting 14-item scale showed good internal consistency (α = .87, 95% CI [.86, .87]), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity within the nomological network. The two scales are a new and reliable way to assess self-perceived positive appraisal style in large-scale studies, which could offer key insights into mechanisms of resilience.

摘要

积极评价风格理论认为,个体对压力源的一般评价风格在心理健康和适应力中起着核心作用。具体来说,积极评价压力源的倾向(积极评价风格;PAS)被认为对心理健康具有保护作用,因此是适应力的关键因素。迄今为止,尚无 PAS 的测量方法。在这里,我们提出了两种衡量感知积极评价风格的量表,一种侧重于导致在压力情境中积极评价的认知过程(PASS-过程),另一种侧重于评价内容(PASS-内容)。对于 PASS-过程,对现有的Brief COPE 和 CERQ-short 问卷的项目进行了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA、CFA),样本分别为 1157 人和 1704 人。由此产生的 10 项问卷具有内部一致性(α =.78,95%CI [.86,.87]),并且与特质乐观、神经质、紧迫性和自发性的自我报告测量相比具有良好的收敛和区分效度。对于 PASS-内容,新生成的 29 项压力源评价内容维度(可能性、大小和应对潜力)的项目池经过两个独立样本(N = 1174 和 N = 1611)的 EFA 和 CFA。由此产生的 14 项量表具有良好的内部一致性(α =.87,95%CI [.86,.87]),以及在概念网络内具有良好的收敛和区分效度。这两个量表为在大规模研究中评估自我感知的积极评价风格提供了一种新的可靠方法,这可能为适应力的机制提供关键见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d5/10836662/aeada0b24182/pone.0295562.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d5/10836662/aeada0b24182/pone.0295562.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d5/10836662/aeada0b24182/pone.0295562.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-report assessment of Positive Appraisal Style (PAS): Development of a process-focused and a content-focused questionnaire for use in mental health and resilience research.积极评价风格的自评评估:为心理健康和韧性研究开发过程导向和内容导向的问卷。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0295562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295562. eCollection 2024.
2
Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.《简要韧性量表(BRS)的因子结构、内部信度和建构效度:一项针对社区中严重精神疾病患者的研究》
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):620-645. doi: 10.1111/papt.12336. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
A multidimensional tool to measure farm stressors: development and initial validation of the farmer stress assessment tool (FSAT).一种多维工具来衡量农场压力源:农民压力评估工具(FSAT)的开发和初步验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;12(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01929-w.
4
Development and Validation of the Resilience Scale for Kidney Transplantation (RS-KTPL).发展和验证肾脏移植弹性量表(RS-KTPL)。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2024 May;18(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Development and initial validation of the Mount Sinai Resilience Scale.山 Sinai 韧性量表的编制与初步验证。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Mar;16(3):407-415. doi: 10.1037/tra0001590. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
A coping self-insight scale for adults: development and preliminary psychometric properties.成人应对自我洞察量表的编制及初步心理测量学特性
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Mar;37(2):157-179. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2290099. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Validity, Reliability, and Differential Item Functioning of English and French Versions of the 10-Item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.《系统性硬化症患者中心干预网络队列研究:10 项 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表的英语和法语版本的有效性、信度和差异项目功能》
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Nov;75(11):2369-2378. doi: 10.1002/acr.25139. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Measurement properties of the Nepali version of the Connor Davidson resilience scales in individuals with chronic pain.尼泊尔语版 Connor Davidson 韧性量表在慢性疼痛患者中的测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 3;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0884-0.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the traditional Chinese version of the resilience Scale-14 and assessment of resilience in Hong Kong adolescents.中文版韧性量表 14 条目的心理计量学评估及香港青少年韧性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 19;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01285-4.
10
Psychometric Properties and Contribution to Mental Health of the Bulgarian version of the 4-Factor Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire.四因素反刍思维方式问卷保加利亚语版的心理测量特性及其对心理健康的贡献
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2019 Dec 31;61(4):529-539. doi: 10.3897/folmed.61.e47726.

引用本文的文献

1
The interactive effects of work-family conflict and coping styles on occupational fatigue among endoscopy nurses: a cross-sectional study.工作家庭冲突与应对方式对内窥镜护士职业疲劳的交互作用:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;13:1591088. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591088. eCollection 2025.
2
Co-RESPOND: a federated network of cohorts on mental health and adversity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges, solutions and recommendations for retrospective data harmonization.Co-RESPOND:COVID-19大流行期间心理健康与逆境队列的联合网络。回顾性数据协调的挑战、解决方案与建议。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2517920. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2517920. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.重新审视抑郁症测量的理论和方法基础。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Jun;1(6):358-368. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00050-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
Individual differences in emotion regulation: Personal tendency in strategy selection is related to implementation capacity and well-being.情绪调节中的个体差异:策略选择中的个人倾向与实施能力和幸福感相关。
Emotion. 2023 Dec;23(8):2331-2343. doi: 10.1037/emo0001234. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Emotion regulation in everyday life: Mapping global self-reports to daily processes.
Development of Powerly, unguided mobile app intervention preventing postpartum depression and anxiety & study protocol of randomized clinical trial.
Powerly的开发,一种预防产后抑郁和焦虑的无指导移动应用程序干预措施及随机临床试验研究方案。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jun 16;41:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100843. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Study protocol for the MIND-PD study: a randomized controlled trial to investigate clinical and biological effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in people with Parkinson's disease.MIND-PD 研究方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在调查正念认知疗法对帕金森病患者的临床和生物学影响。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03736-7.
5
Predictors of stress resilience in Parkinson's disease and associations with symptom progression.帕金森病应激恢复力的预测因素及其与症状进展的关联。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Apr 11;10(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4.
6
What helps the helpers? Resilience and risk factors for general and profession-specific mental health problems in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来帮助助人者?新冠疫情期间心理治疗师常见及特定职业心理健康问题的恢复力和风险因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 18;14:1272199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272199. eCollection 2023.
7
Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial.一项可扩展的、远程提供的阶梯式护理干预措施,以减轻荷兰波兰移民工人心理困扰症状的有效性:RESPOND 随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 2;23(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05288-5.
8
Psychological Resilience Factors and Their Association With Weekly Stressor Reactivity During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Europe: Prospective Longitudinal Study.欧洲新冠疫情期间的心理韧性因素及其与每周应激源反应性的关联:前瞻性纵向研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 17;10:e46518. doi: 10.2196/46518.
9
Investigating two mobile just-in-time adaptive interventions to foster psychological resilience: research protocol of the DynaM-INT study.研究两种促进心理弹性的移动即时自适应干预措施:DynaM-INT 研究的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 25;11(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01249-5.
10
Improving goal striving and resilience in older adults through a personalized metacognitive self-help intervention: a protocol paper.通过个性化元认知自助干预提高老年人的目标追求和适应力:方案论文。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 4;11(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01259-3.
日常生活中的情绪调节:将整体自我报告映射到日常过程
Emotion. 2023 Mar;23(2):357-374. doi: 10.1037/emo0001097. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
Thinking thrice about sum scores, and then some more about measurement and analysis.再三思考总和分数,然后再进一步思考测量和分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):788-806. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01849-w. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Don't stress, it's under control: Neural correlates of stressor controllability in humans.别紧张,一切尽在掌控中:人类应激可控性的神经相关因素。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 15;245:118701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118701. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
6
Identifying the determinants of emotion regulation choice: a systematic review with meta-analysis.确定情绪调节选择的决定因素:系统评价与元分析。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Sep;35(6):1056-1084. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1945538. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Resilience in Adult Health Science Revisited-A Narrative Review Synthesis of Process-Oriented Approaches.成人健康科学中的复原力再探讨——面向过程方法的叙事综述合成
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:659395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659395. eCollection 2021.
8
Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report.去中心化为心理治疗和预防青少年焦虑和抑郁的核心组成部分:叙事综述和洞察报告。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 14;11(1):288. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01397-5.
9
The development and psychometric properties of a self-report Catastrophizing Questionnaire.一份自我报告式灾难化问卷的编制及其心理测量学特性
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):201362. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201362. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Developing and Validating Clinical Questionnaires.开发和验证临床调查问卷。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:55-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115343. Epub 2021 Feb 9.