Departamento de Filología Inglesa y Alemana, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Zaragoza, Spain.
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(3):253-268. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2021.2003515. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
This contribution brings to the fore the lesbian silences veiled by dominant theorizations of queer studies in academia, nowadays more concerned with analyzing social affections such as queer diasporas, terrorism, human rights and necropolitics and positing intersectionality as the key configuration of queer epistemology. Yet, I am interested in eliciting how such existing approaches can help chart queer horizons in more inclusive ways without ignoring lesbian voices. Concomitantly, I will posit such lesbian positions as critical epistemologies we cannot do without, since only by unfolding past accretive knowledge on gender and sexuality will queer discourses become inclusive and relational. Hence, this article traces the evolution and theoretical shifts that queer theory has undergone in the last decades and further explores why "the lesbian" continues being dismissed as a marginal site of knowledge and material production, enacting a closeted identity, muted by other legitimate discourses in academia. Such a move toward new queer and affective frameworks, while convincingly essential, should not overshadow lesbian criticism. By drawing on relational and affective modes of being, I suggest recasting "the lesbian" as both a textual and ontological possibility capable of embracing the variety of lesbian-identified persons traditionally silenced by queer theory's canonical institutionalization.
本文将突显学术界中 queer 研究主流理论所掩盖的女同性恋沉默,这些理论如今更关注分析诸如酷儿散居、恐怖主义、人权和生死政治等社会情感,并将交叉性作为 queer 认识论的关键配置。然而,我感兴趣的是,这些现有的方法如何能够以更具包容性的方式帮助绘制酷儿的视野,而不会忽视女同性恋者的声音。同时,我将提出这样的女同性恋观点,即作为批判认识论,我们不能没有它们,因为只有展开关于性别和性的过去累积知识,酷儿话语才会变得包容和相关。因此,本文追溯了 queer 理论在过去几十年中经历的演变和理论转变,并进一步探讨了为什么“女同性恋”仍然被视为知识和物质生产的边缘场所,表现出一种隐蔽的身份,被学术界的其他合法话语所压制。这种向新的酷儿和情感框架的转变虽然令人信服,但也不应该忽视女同性恋批评。通过借鉴关系和情感存在模式,我建议将“女同性恋”重新塑造为一种文本和本体论的可能性,能够包容传统上被 queer 理论的规范制度化所压制的各种认同女同性恋的人。