Suppr超能文献

通过合并个体随机试验和整群随机试验的数据来估计直接和间接疫苗接种效果的方法。

Methods for the estimation of direct and indirect vaccination effects by combining data from individual- and cluster-randomized trials.

作者信息

Wang Rui, Cen Mengqi, Huang Yunda, Qian George, Dean Natalie E, Ellenberg Susan S, Fleming Thomas R, Lu Wenbin, Longini Ira M

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2024 Apr 15;43(8):1627-1639. doi: 10.1002/sim.10030. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

Abstract

Both individually and cluster randomized study designs have been used for vaccine trials to assess the effects of vaccine on reducing the risk of disease or infection. The choice between individually and cluster randomized designs is often driven by the target estimand of interest (eg, direct versus total), statistical power, and, importantly, logistic feasibility. To combat emerging infectious disease threats, especially when the number of events from one single trial may not be adequate to obtain vaccine effect estimates with a desired level of precision, it may be necessary to combine information across multiple trials. In this article, we propose a model formulation to estimate the direct, indirect, total, and overall vaccine effects combining data from trials with two types of study designs: individual-randomization and cluster-randomization, based on a Cox proportional hazards model, where the hazard of infection depends on both vaccine status of the individual as well as the vaccine status of the other individuals in the same cluster. We illustrate the use of the proposed model and assess the potential efficiency gain from combining data from multiple trials, compared to using data from each individual trial alone, through two simulation studies, one of which is designed based on a cholera vaccine trial previously carried out in Matlab, Bangladesh.

摘要

个体随机和整群随机研究设计都已用于疫苗试验,以评估疫苗在降低疾病或感染风险方面的效果。个体随机设计和整群随机设计之间的选择通常由感兴趣的目标估计量(例如,直接效应与总效应)、统计效力,以及重要的是后勤可行性驱动。为应对新出现的传染病威胁,特别是当单个试验的事件数量可能不足以获得具有所需精度水平的疫苗效果估计时,可能有必要合并多个试验的信息。在本文中,我们基于Cox比例风险模型提出一种模型公式,用于结合来自个体随机化和整群随机化这两种研究设计的试验数据,估计直接、间接、总以及总体疫苗效果,其中感染风险取决于个体的疫苗接种状态以及同一群组中其他个体的疫苗接种状态。我们通过两项模拟研究说明了所提出模型的使用,并评估了与单独使用每个个体试验的数据相比,合并多个试验数据可能带来的效率提升,其中一项模拟研究是基于先前在孟加拉国马特拉布进行的霍乱疫苗试验设计的。

相似文献

4
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
5
Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.口服霍乱疫苗预防霍乱。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD014573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014573.
7
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.用于预防健康儿童流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5.
9
Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhoea.预防产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)腹泻的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 5;2013(7):CD009029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009029.pub2.

本文引用的文献

9
Toward Causal Inference With Interference.迈向具有干扰性的因果推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Jun;103(482):832-842. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000292.
10
Controlling endemic cholera with oral vaccines.使用口服疫苗控制地方性霍乱。
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040336.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验