Department of Dental Prosthetics, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 6, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, Lublin 20-290, Poland.
Micron. 2024 Apr;179:103608. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2024.103608. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
Research on the structure and chemical composition of dental tissues allows for the optimisation of materials used in the treatment and care of teeth. Understanding pathological processes occurring in dental tissues and their reactions to various substances, including dental materials, are crucial for the development of new dental technologies. The aim of the study was to check the similarities in the chemical and morphological structure of enamel and dentine powders in various groups of permanent teeth, as well as differential chemical analysis for both grinded tissues tested. The extracted non-carious and non-pathological human permanent teeth were divided into four groups: incisors, canines, premolars and molars. Each tooth was sectioned to thick slices. Enamel and dentine were mechanically separated and ground in an agate mortar and pestle. FT-Raman and FTIR spectroscopy methods were used for the analysis of biological tissues. SEM method was applied to visualise hard dental tissues structures present on the surface and within the particles. The morphological structures were the same within the analysed tissues and did not depend on the analysed group of teeth. A comparison of the mineral-to-organic ratios of enamel and dentine in each tooth group showed that the bands related to PO were clearly higher in content for enamel than for dentine. Higher absorbance measured at the region of 2800-3700 cm and at 1500-1800 cm for dentine as compared to enamel samples were indicative of a higher content of organic structures. The highest contribution of phosphates was in canine enamel samples.The studies showed that the carbonate-to-phosphate ratio was higher for dentine (0.20 - 0.48) compared to the values obtained for enamel (0.13 - 0.22), however, minor differences were found in each group of enamel or dentine samples. The lack of significant differences between the enamel and dentine powders of incisors, canines, premolars and molars may prove that each extracted tooth, regardless of the tooth group, is an excellent substrate for their substitution.
对牙组织的结构和化学成分的研究可以优化用于治疗和护理牙齿的材料。了解牙组织中发生的病理过程及其对各种物质的反应,包括牙科材料,对于开发新的牙科技术至关重要。本研究的目的是检查不同组别的恒牙的釉质和牙本质粉末在化学和形态结构上的相似性,以及对两种研磨组织的差异化学分析。从非龋病和非病理性的人类恒牙中提取样本,分为切牙、尖牙、前磨牙和磨牙四组。每颗牙齿都被切成厚片。用机械方法将釉质和牙本质从牙齿中分离出来,并在玛瑙研钵和研杵中研磨。采用傅里叶变换拉曼(FT-Raman)和傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱法对生物组织进行分析。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)法用于观察硬牙组织的表面和颗粒内部结构。分析组织的形态结构相同,与所分析的牙齿组无关。对每组牙齿的釉质和牙本质的矿物质与有机物比值进行比较,结果表明,与牙本质相比,PO 相关带在釉质中的含量明显更高。与釉质样本相比,牙本质样本在 2800-3700 cm 和 1500-1800 cm 区域的吸收更高,表明其有机结构含量更高。在犬齿的釉质样本中,磷酸盐的贡献最高。研究表明,牙本质的碳酸盐与磷酸盐比值(0.20-0.48)高于釉质(0.13-0.22),但在每个釉质或牙本质样本组中都发现了较小的差异。切牙、尖牙、前磨牙和磨牙的釉质和牙本质粉末之间没有明显差异,这可能证明无论牙齿组别如何,每个提取的牙齿都是替代它们的极好的基质。