• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LUTS 是否预示着死亡风险?基于随机森林算法的分析。

Do LUTS Predict Mortality? An Analysis Using Random Forest Algorithms.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 12;19:237-245. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S432368. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S432368
PMID:38371602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10873145/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate a random forest (RF) algorithm of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as a predictor of all-cause mortality in a population-based cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based cohort of 3143 men born in 1924, 1934, and 1944 was evaluated using a mailed questionnaire including the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS-1) to assess LUTS as well as questions on medical conditions and behavioral and sociodemographic factors. Surveys were repeated in 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009 and 2015. The cohort was followed-up for vital status until the end of 2018. RF uses an ensemble of classification trees for prediction with a good flexibility and without overfitting. RF algorithms were developed to predict the five-year mortality using LUTS, demographic, medical, and behavioral factors alone and in combinations.

RESULTS

A total of 2663 men were included in the study, of whom 917 (34%) died during follow-up (median follow-up time 15.0 years). The LUTS-based RF algorithm showed an area under the curve (AUC) 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69) for five-year mortality. An expanded RF algorithm, including LUTS, medical history, and behavioral and sociodemographic factors, yielded an AUC 0.73 (0.65-0.81), while an algorithm excluding LUTS yielded an AUC 0.71 (0.62-0.78).

CONCLUSION

An exploratory RF algorithm using LUTS can predict all-cause mortality with acceptable discrimination at the group level. In clinical practice, it is unlikely that LUTS will improve the accuracy to predict death if the patient's background is well known.

摘要

目的

评估基于随机森林(RF)算法的下尿路症状(LUTS)作为人群全因死亡率的预测因子。

材料与方法

本研究基于一个人群队列,共纳入了 1924 年、1934 年和 1944 年出生的 3143 名男性,采用邮寄问卷的方式进行评估,问卷包括丹麦前列腺症状评分(DAN-PSS-1)以评估 LUTS 以及有关医疗状况、行为和社会人口学因素的问题。调查于 1994 年、1999 年、2004 年、2009 年和 2015 年重复进行。队列随访至 2018 年底,以确定存活状态。RF 算法使用分类树的集合进行预测,具有很好的灵活性,不会发生过拟合。RF 算法用于开发单独和组合使用 LUTS、人口统计学、医学和行为因素来预测五年死亡率。

结果

共有 2663 名男性纳入本研究,其中 917 名(34%)在随访期间死亡(中位随访时间 15.0 年)。基于 LUTS 的 RF 算法预测五年死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.60(95%CI 0.52-0.69)。包含 LUTS、病史以及行为和社会人口学因素的扩展 RF 算法的 AUC 为 0.73(0.65-0.81),而不包含 LUTS 的算法的 AUC 为 0.71(0.62-0.78)。

结论

使用 LUTS 的探索性 RF 算法可以在群组水平上以可接受的区分度预测全因死亡率。在临床实践中,如果患者的背景情况已知,LUTS 不太可能提高预测死亡的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4379/10873145/8dae1c151d58/CIA-19-237-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4379/10873145/49beabaf0d7d/CIA-19-237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4379/10873145/8dae1c151d58/CIA-19-237-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4379/10873145/49beabaf0d7d/CIA-19-237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4379/10873145/8dae1c151d58/CIA-19-237-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Do LUTS Predict Mortality? An Analysis Using Random Forest Algorithms.LUTS 是否预示着死亡风险?基于随机森林算法的分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 12;19:237-245. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S432368. eCollection 2024.
2
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Mortality among Finnish Men: The Roles of Symptom Severity and Bother.芬兰男性下尿路症状与死亡率:症状严重程度和困扰的作用。
J Urol. 2022 Jun;207(6):1285-1294. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002450. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
Sauna habits/bathing and changes in lower urinary tract symptoms - Tampere Ageing Male Urologic Study (TAMUS).桑拿习惯/洗浴与下尿路症状变化 - 坦佩雷老年男性泌尿科研究(TAMUS)。
Scand J Urol. 2022 Feb;56(1):77-82. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2021.2002403. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients in adulthood with bladder exstrophy and epispadias.成人膀胱外翻和尿道下裂患者的下尿路症状(LUTS)。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11756.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
Empirical evaluation of grouping of lower urinary tract symptoms: principal component analysis of Tampere Ageing Male Urological Study data.基于坦佩雷男性老龄化泌尿研究数据的主成分分析对下尿路症状分组的实证评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11593.x. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
6
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Erectile Dysfunction, and Quality of Life in Poststroke Men: A Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.中风后男性的下尿路症状、勃起功能障碍与生活质量:一项对照横断面研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):748-756. doi: 10.1177/1557988317690283. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
Prevalence of distress and symptom severity from the lower urinary tract in men: a population-based study with the DAN-PSS questionnaire.男性下尿路困扰的患病率及症状严重程度:一项基于人群的DAN-PSS问卷研究
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):617-22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh607. Epub 2004 Oct 1.
8
Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men by international prostate symptom score and core lower urinary tract symptom score.国际前列腺症状评分和核心下尿路症状评分评估男性下尿路症状。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1512-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10445.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
Impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on mortality: a 21-year follow-up among middle-aged and elderly Finnish men.下尿路症状对死亡率的影响:一项针对中年和老年芬兰男性的 21 年随访研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):317-323. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0108-z. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Validation of the Arabic linguistic version of the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score for benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.丹麦前列腺症状评分阿拉伯语语言版本用于与下尿路症状相关的良性前列腺增生的验证。
Arab J Urol. 2021 Feb 20;19(4):464-468. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1892291. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Mortality in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测外科重症监护病房患者的死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 31;8:621861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.621861. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and validation of prediction model to estimate 10-year risk of all-cause mortality using modern statistical learning methods: a large population-based cohort study and external validation.利用现代统计学习方法开发和验证预测模型,以估计全因死亡率的 10 年风险:一项大型基于人群的队列研究和外部验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01204-7.
3
A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction.
基于机器学习的高维临床数据生存分析方法在痴呆预测中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w.
4
Impact of Nocturia on Mortality: The Nagahama Study.夜尿症对死亡率的影响:长滨研究。
J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):996-1002. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001138. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
BiMM tree: A decision tree method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.BiMM树:一种用于对聚类和纵向二元结局进行建模的决策树方法。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2020;49(4):1004-1023. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2018.1490429. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
BiMM forest: A random forest method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.BiMM森林:一种用于对聚类和纵向二元结局进行建模的随机森林方法。
Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2019 Feb 15;185:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Is There an Association between Urinary Incontinence and Mortality? A Retrospective Cohort Study.尿失禁与死亡率之间是否存在关联?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):591-597. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000574. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
The Impact of Nocturia on Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.夜尿症对死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):486-495. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000463. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Identifying the DEAD: Development and Validation of a Patient-Level Model to Predict Death Status in Population-Level Claims Data.识别死亡患者:基于人群水平理赔数据建立预测患者死亡状态的个体水平预测模型的开发和验证。
Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;42(11):1377-1386. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00827-0.
10
Prediction of premature all-cause mortality: A prospective general population cohort study comparing machine-learning and standard epidemiological approaches.预测全因过早死亡:一项比较机器学习和标准流行病学方法的前瞻性一般人群队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0214365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214365. eCollection 2019.