• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习算法预测外科重症监护病房患者的死亡率

Prediction of Mortality in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

作者信息

Yun Kyongsik, Oh Jihoon, Hong Tae Ho, Kim Eun Young

机构信息

Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 31;8:621861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.621861. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.621861
PMID:33869245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8044535/
Abstract

Predicting prognosis of in-hospital patients is critical. However, it is challenging to accurately predict the life and death of certain patients at certain period. To determine whether machine learning algorithms could predict in-hospital death of critically ill patients with considerable accuracy and identify factors contributing to the prediction power. Using medical data of 1,384 patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of our institution, we investigated whether machine learning algorithms could predict in-hospital death using demographic, laboratory, and other disease-related variables, and compared predictions using three different algorithmic methods. The outcome measurement was the incidence of unexpected postoperative mortality which was defined as mortality without pre-existing not-for-resuscitation order that occurred within 30 days of the surgery or within the same hospital stay as the surgery. Machine learning algorithms trained with 43 variables successfully classified dead and live patients with very high accuracy. Most notably, the decision tree showed the higher classification results (Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve, AUC = 0.96) than the neural network classifier (AUC = 0.80). Further analysis provided the insight that serum albumin concentration, total prenatal nutritional intake, and peak dose of dopamine drug played an important role in predicting the mortality of SICU patients. Our results suggest that machine learning algorithms, especially the decision tree method, can provide information on structured and explainable decision flow and accurately predict hospital mortality in SICU hospitalized patients.

摘要

预测住院患者的预后至关重要。然而,准确预测某些患者在特定时期内的生死具有挑战性。为了确定机器学习算法是否能够相当准确地预测重症患者的院内死亡,并识别有助于预测能力的因素。我们利用本院外科重症监护病房(SICU)收治的1384例患者的医疗数据,研究机器学习算法能否使用人口统计学、实验室检查及其他疾病相关变量预测院内死亡,并比较三种不同算法方法的预测结果。结局指标是意外术后死亡率,其定义为在手术30天内或与手术在同一住院期间发生的、无预先存在的不予复苏医嘱的死亡。用43个变量训练的机器学习算法成功地以非常高的准确率对死亡和存活患者进行了分类。最值得注意的是,决策树显示出比神经网络分类器更高的分类结果(受试者操作特征曲线下面积,AUC = 0.96)(AUC = 0.80)。进一步分析表明,血清白蛋白浓度、产前总营养摄入量和多巴胺药物峰值剂量在预测SICU患者死亡率方面发挥了重要作用。我们的结果表明,机器学习算法,尤其是决策树方法,可以提供有关结构化且可解释的决策流程的信息,并准确预测SICU住院患者的医院死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/de45a616a089/fmed-08-621861-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/531e8c99041f/fmed-08-621861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/198f355b78ea/fmed-08-621861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/f5ffc15616f6/fmed-08-621861-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/727c792f3ea0/fmed-08-621861-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/a3612a6a0811/fmed-08-621861-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/de45a616a089/fmed-08-621861-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/531e8c99041f/fmed-08-621861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/198f355b78ea/fmed-08-621861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/f5ffc15616f6/fmed-08-621861-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/727c792f3ea0/fmed-08-621861-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/a3612a6a0811/fmed-08-621861-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9e/8044535/de45a616a089/fmed-08-621861-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Mortality in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测外科重症监护病房患者的死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 31;8:621861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.621861. eCollection 2021.
2
A proof-of-concept study on mortality prediction with machine learning algorithms using burn intensive care data.一项利用烧伤重症监护数据通过机器学习算法进行死亡率预测的概念验证研究。
Scars Burn Heal. 2022 Feb 18;8:20595131211066585. doi: 10.1177/20595131211066585. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Mortality Prediction in Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Intensive Care Units.在重症监护病房使用机器学习算法预测脑出血患者的死亡率
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 20;11:610531. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.610531. eCollection 2020.
5
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
6
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Using Machine Learning to Make Predictions in Patients Who Fall.使用机器学习预测跌倒患者的情况。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.047. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations.机器学习在神经外科手术部位感染预测中的应用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Aug 1;47(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19241.
9
Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models.使用机器学习模型预测重症烧伤患者烧伤手术后的死亡率
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 6;12(8):1293. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081293.
10
Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.机器学习方法与传统回归在预测病房临床病情恶化方面的多中心比较
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):368-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001571.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis and Mapping of Machine Learning in the Context of Diabetes.糖尿病背景下机器学习的分析与映射
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 13;8(8):e71167. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71167. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Naïve Bayes is an interpretable and predictive machine learning algorithm in predicting osteoporotic hip fracture in-hospital mortality compared to other machine learning algorithms.与其他机器学习算法相比,朴素贝叶斯是一种可解释且具有预测性的机器学习算法,用于预测骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的院内死亡率。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 2;4(1):e0000529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000529. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Early prediction of mortality upon intensive care unit admission.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of 1-Year Mortality Utilizing Electronic Medical Record Data Available at the End of Hospitalization in Multicondition Patients: a Proof-of-Concept Study.利用多病种患者住院结束时可获取的电子病历数据开发和验证机器学习模型预测 1 年死亡率:概念验证研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4316-y. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Classification of Suicide Attempts through a Machine Learning Algorithm Based on Multiple Systemic Psychiatric Scales.基于多种系统精神科量表的机器学习算法对自杀未遂的分类
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 29;8:192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00192. eCollection 2017.
3
重症监护病房入院时死亡率的早期预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02807-6.
4
Is minimally invasive surgery a game changer in spinal surgery?微创手术是脊柱外科手术的变革者吗?
Asian Spine J. 2024 Oct;18(5):743-752. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0337. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.机器学习在预测癌症患者围手术期结局中的应用:临床医生的叙述性综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 May 11;31(5):2727-2747. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050207.
6
Do LUTS Predict Mortality? An Analysis Using Random Forest Algorithms.LUTS 是否预示着死亡风险?基于随机森林算法的分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 12;19:237-245. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S432368. eCollection 2024.
7
Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.围手术期医学并发症预测和预后评估:机器学习工具的系统评价和 PROBAST 评估。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Jan 1;140(1):85-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004764.
8
Construction of an auxiliary scoring model for myelosuppression in patients with lung cancer chemotherapy based on random forest algorithm.基于随机森林算法构建肺癌化疗患者骨髓抑制辅助评分模型
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4155-4163. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Mortality Prediction in a Prospective Cohort of Older Adults.机器学习技术在老年前瞻性队列中死亡率预测的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 4;18(23):12806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312806.
10
Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies.机器学习模型在临床和社区护理环境中用于2型糖尿病预测的应用与性能:预测建模研究的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Digit Health. 2021 Sep 28;7:20552076211047390. doi: 10.1177/20552076211047390. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.
深度学习算法在视网膜眼底照片糖尿病视网膜病变检测中的开发与验证。
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216.
4
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care.重症监护中的机器学习与决策支持
Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2016 Feb;104(2):444-466. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2501978. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries.7 个发达国家癌症死亡患者的死亡地点、医疗保健利用情况和医院支出比较。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):272-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18603.
6
Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.机器学习方法与传统回归在预测病房临床病情恶化方面的多中心比较
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):368-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001571.
7
Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study.重症监护病房死亡率预测的超级 ICU 学习者算法(SICULA):一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70239-5. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
Unfolding Physiological State: Mortality Modelling in Intensive Care Units.展开生理状态:重症监护病房的死亡率建模
KDD. 2014 Aug 24;2014:75-84. doi: 10.1145/2623330.2623742.
9
Preoperative serum albumin is associated with mortality and complications after radical cystectomy.术前血清白蛋白与根治性膀胱切除术患者的死亡率和并发症相关。
BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):918-23. doi: 10.1111/bju.12405.
10
Evaluation of the modified MEDS, MEWS score and Charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department.评价改良的 MEDS、MEWS 评分和 Charlson 合并症指数在急诊科社区获得性脓毒症患者中的应用。
Intern Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;8(3):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s11739-012-0890-x. Epub 2012 Dec 19.