Bai Jiafei, Ma Wentao, Wang Yuxin, Jiang Jiayue
School of Business Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China.
School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 8;10(4):e25730. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25730. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
This paper used a multi-period DID model with panel data from 283 Chinese cities between 2006 and 2019 to investigate the emission reduction effects and mechanisms of China's carbon trading scheme. The research revealed that China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme not only stimulated businesses to reduce emissions as a market-based environmental regulation policy but also influenced local governments' governance objectives. As a result, the Hawthorne effect inevitably manifested during the experimental period of China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme. Further analysis indicated that China's CETS encouraged local authorities to take a more proactive stance towards the balance between environmental preservation and economic growth, aiming to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome. Based on the political stance of local governments, they are likely to simultaneously increase their focus on both economic growth and environmental protection. However, when faced with the conflict between economic advancement and environmental safeguarding, pilot regions prioritized ecological conservation in their practical steps, leading to a modest decline in economic growth. In other words, the government's high-profile announcements may not always manifest in actual deeds. In practice, local authorities tend to allocate more administrative resources to areas highly prioritized by the central government. Furthermore, the extended analysis reveals that China's CETS has resulted in a reduction in social welfare due to a shift in governance priorities influenced by political incentives. Therefore, fine-tuning the performance evaluation mechanism, preventing any bias towards the target preferences of local authorities, and guaranteeing the successful operation of the market mechanism are imperative to achieve truly low-cost and sustainable emissions reductions objectives for CETS.
本文采用多期双重差分模型,利用2006年至2019年间283个中国城市的面板数据,研究中国碳排放交易计划的减排效果和机制。研究发现,中国碳排放交易计划作为一项基于市场的环境监管政策,不仅刺激企业减排,还影响了地方政府的治理目标。因此,在中国碳排放交易计划的试点期间,霍桑效应不可避免地显现出来。进一步分析表明,中国碳排放交易体系鼓励地方政府在环境保护和经济增长之间采取更积极的平衡立场,旨在实现互利共赢。基于地方政府的政治立场,它们可能会同时加大对经济增长和环境保护的关注。然而,当面临经济发展与环境保护的冲突时,试点地区在实际行动中优先考虑生态保护,导致经济增长略有下降。换句话说,政府的高调宣示未必总能体现在实际行动中。在实践中,地方政府往往会将更多行政资源分配到中央政府高度重视的领域。此外,扩展分析表明,由于政治激励影响治理重点的转移,中国碳排放交易体系导致了社会福利的减少。因此,微调绩效评估机制,防止对地方政府目标偏好的任何偏向,确保市场机制的成功运行,对于实现碳排放交易体系真正低成本和可持续的减排目标至关重要。