School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 8;58(40):17661-17673. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04738. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Emission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China's regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China's regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China's regional ETSs reduce CO emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.
排放交易计划(ETS)越来越成为平衡碳减排和经济增长的流行政策工具。由于尚未建立全球统一的碳定价体系,区域性 ETS 是否会导致碳泄漏仍然是一个主要关注点。本研究以中国的区域试点 ETS 为准自然实验,利用空间双重差分法考察了区域 ETS 如何影响政策实施城市内外的碳排放。我们的分析发现,中国的区域 ETS 政策有助于减少城市 CO 排放 6.1%,降低受管制城市的排放强度 6.6%,导致碳泄漏,使邻近城市的 CO 排放平均增加 1.7%。我们的研究结果进一步表明,区域 ETS 通过外包生产、提高能源效率和脱碳能源结构来减轻本地 CO 排放,而工业生产的外包则推高了邻近城市的 CO 排放。此外,区域 ETS 的表现因社会经济背景和机制设计的不同而有很大差异。中国的区域 ETS 在中心城市和工业城市更有效地减少了 CO 排放,但碳泄漏更严重,而严格的合规机制和积极的市场交易有助于深化碳减排和减轻碳泄漏。