• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国区域碳市场的减排和泄漏。

Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China's Regional Carbon Emission Trading.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 8;58(40):17661-17673. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04738. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c04738
PMID:39186463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11465775/
Abstract

Emission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China's regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China's regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China's regional ETSs reduce CO emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.

摘要

排放交易计划(ETS)越来越成为平衡碳减排和经济增长的流行政策工具。由于尚未建立全球统一的碳定价体系,区域性 ETS 是否会导致碳泄漏仍然是一个主要关注点。本研究以中国的区域试点 ETS 为准自然实验,利用空间双重差分法考察了区域 ETS 如何影响政策实施城市内外的碳排放。我们的分析发现,中国的区域 ETS 政策有助于减少城市 CO 排放 6.1%,降低受管制城市的排放强度 6.6%,导致碳泄漏,使邻近城市的 CO 排放平均增加 1.7%。我们的研究结果进一步表明,区域 ETS 通过外包生产、提高能源效率和脱碳能源结构来减轻本地 CO 排放,而工业生产的外包则推高了邻近城市的 CO 排放。此外,区域 ETS 的表现因社会经济背景和机制设计的不同而有很大差异。中国的区域 ETS 在中心城市和工业城市更有效地减少了 CO 排放,但碳泄漏更严重,而严格的合规机制和积极的市场交易有助于深化碳减排和减轻碳泄漏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/11465775/e30558c01e95/es4c04738_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/11465775/e30558c01e95/es4c04738_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/11465775/e30558c01e95/es4c04738_0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China's Regional Carbon Emission Trading.中国区域碳市场的减排和泄漏。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 8;58(40):17661-17673. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04738. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
China's pilot emissions trading schemes and competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the provincial industrial sub-sectors.中国的试点排放交易计划与竞争力:省级工业子行业的实证分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Mar 15;258:109997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109997. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Opportunity and marginal abatement cost savings from China's pilot carbon emissions permit trading system: Simulating evidence from the industrial sectors.中国试点碳排放许可交易体系的机会和边际减排成本节约:来自工业部门的模拟证据。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 1;271:110975. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110975. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
5
Has Carbon Emissions Trading Reduced PM in China?碳排放交易是否减少了中国的 PM 污染?
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6631-6643. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00248. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Emission reductions, industrial competitiveness, and spillover effects under China's regional emission trading systems: Evidence from the iron and steel sector.中国区域排放交易体系下的减排、产业竞争力和溢出效应:来自钢铁行业的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118481. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118481. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
7
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
8
Sulfur dioxide emissions curbing effects and influencing mechanisms of China's emission trading system.二氧化硫排放抑制效应及中国排放交易体系的影响机制。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0276601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276601. eCollection 2022.
9
The effectiveness of China's regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.中国区域碳市场试点对企业减排的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
10
Does the low carbon transition impact urban resilience? Evidence from China's pilot cities for carbon emission trading.低碳转型是否会影响城市韧性?来自中国碳排放交易试点城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11128-11149. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31903-3. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Policy solutions for addressing carbon leakage: Insights from meta-regression analysis.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;365:121557. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121557. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
The role of China's carbon emission trading system in economic decarbonization: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities.中国碳排放交易体系在经济脱碳中的作用:来自中国地级市的证据
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 17;10(1):e23799. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23799. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Emission reductions, industrial competitiveness, and spillover effects under China's regional emission trading systems: Evidence from the iron and steel sector.中国区域排放交易体系下的减排、产业竞争力和溢出效应:来自钢铁行业的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118481. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118481. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
4
Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy.市场激励、碳配额分配与碳排放减排:来自中国碳交易试点政策的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115650. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
5
Price and scale effects of China's carbon emission trading system pilots on emission reduction.中国碳排放交易体系试点对减排的价格和规模效应
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 15;314:115054. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115054. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
The effectiveness of China's regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.中国区域碳市场试点对企业减排的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
7
County-level CO emissions and sequestration in China during 1997-2017.1997-2017 年中国县级 CO 排放与封存。
Sci Data. 2020 Nov 12;7(1):391. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00736-3.
8
The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO emissions despite low prices.欧盟排放交易体系在价格较低的情况下减少了 CO 排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 21;117(16):8804-8812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918128117. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China.中国碳排放交易机制下的低碳创新。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 9;10(1):4088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12213-6.
10
A comparative analysis of Chinese regional climate regulation policy: ETS as an example.中国区域气候调节政策的比较分析:以 ETS 为例。
Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Mar;42(3):819-840. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00310-w. Epub 2019 May 13.