Scheerbaum Petra, Gräßel Elmar, Wasic Catharina, Pendergrass Anna
Zentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Feb;86(S 01):S13-S20. doi: 10.1055/a-2003-9184. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
In Germany, people in need of care are mainly cared for by their relatives who make use of various outpatient relief and support services. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of actual use as well as the desired use of outpatient relief and support services. Dementia and non-dementia as causes behind need for care are distinguished.
A representative sample of informal caregivers of statutorily insured care recipients assessed by the MD Bayern during application for a care level classification (n=958) was analyzed. The use of the following outpatient relief and support services was investigated: outpatient care service; domestic help; day care centre; meals on wheels; driving service; care service; 24-hour care; and care group. Characteristics of the care receiver, the informal caregiver and the care situation were recorded. Difference analyses were carried out using Chi² tests and t-tests.
The use of outpatient support services was low despite the high care burden on informal caregivers ranging from 1,7% for the care group to 38,4% for the outpatient care service. More than 40% of respondents did not use any of the eight services. However, from this non-user group, 72% had a desire to use at least one of the eight services in the future. Domestic help and outpatient care services were the most frequently requested services by non-users. Actual and desired use was more common for dementia than for other causes of need for care, especially for day care, care group and care service.
The desire for utilization is significantly higher than the reality of utilization. In general, the use of outpatient relief and support services is low. The causes of this discrepancy need to be explored. Therefore, effective strategies need to be developed to advise informal caregivers which ensure suitable respite services will be used to strengthen the home care situation.
在德国,需要护理的人主要由其亲属照顾,亲属会利用各种门诊护理和支持服务。本研究的目的是确定门诊护理和支持服务的实际使用频率以及期望使用频率。区分痴呆症和非痴呆症作为需要护理的原因。
分析了巴伐利亚州医学博士在申请护理级别分类期间评估的法定参保护理接受者的非正式护理人员的代表性样本(n = 958)。调查了以下门诊护理和支持服务的使用情况:门诊护理服务;家政服务;日托中心;送餐服务;驾驶服务;护理服务;24小时护理;以及护理小组。记录了护理接受者、非正式护理人员和护理情况的特征。使用卡方检验和t检验进行差异分析。
尽管非正式护理人员的护理负担很重,但门诊支持服务的使用率很低,护理小组的使用率为1.7%,门诊护理服务的使用率为38.4%。超过40%的受访者没有使用这八项服务中的任何一项。然而,在这个未使用者群体中,72%的人希望未来至少使用八项服务中的一项。家政服务和门诊护理服务是未使用者最常要求的服务。痴呆症患者的实际和期望使用率高于其他需要护理的原因,特别是日托、护理小组和护理服务。
利用的愿望明显高于实际利用情况。总体而言,门诊护理和支持服务的使用率较低。需要探讨这种差异的原因。因此,需要制定有效的策略来指导非正式护理人员,确保使用合适的临时护理服务来加强家庭护理情况。