• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种微量定量悬浮试验,以确定戊二醛的杀菌和杀酵母活性——改进消毒剂测试可持续性的一步。

Evaluation of a microscale quantitative suspension test to determine the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaral - one step to improve sustainability in disinfectant testing.

作者信息

Gebel Jürgen, Rausch Marvin, Bienentreu Katja, Droop Felix, Eggers Maren, Gebel Lea, Gemein Stefanie, Hornei Britt, Ilschner Carola, Jacobshagen Anja, Kampf Günter, Papan Cihan, Roesch Kira, Schmitz Luisa, Suchomel Miranda, Vossebein Lutz, Mutters Nico T, Exner Martin

机构信息

Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Clinics Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

VAH - Association for Applied Hygiene c/o Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Jan 30;19:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000458. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3205/dgkh000458
PMID:38404411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10884837/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate a newly developed microscale quantitative suspension test compared to the existing standard suspension test using determination of the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaral as one step to improve the sustainability of disinfectant testing.

METHODS

The testing principles of the quantitative suspension test according to VAH method 9 (comparable to EN 13727) was used as a standard suspension test using 8.0 mL product test solution, 1.0 mL organic load and 1.0 mL test suspension. In addition, a micro-scale suspension test was performed in 96-well plates with 160 µL product test solution, 20 µL organic load and 20 µL test suspension. ATCC 6538, ATCC 15442 and ATCC 10231 were test organisms. Glutaral was tested at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% with exposure times of 1, 5 and 15 min. Polysorbate 80 (30 g/L), lecithin (9 g/L), L-histidine (1 g/L) and glycine (10 g/L) were used as validated neutralizers. After serial dilution of the disinfectant-neutralizer-mixture, plates were incubated for 48 h at 36°C (bacteria) or 72 hours at 30°C () and colony forming units (cfu) counted. The lg reduction was calculated as the difference between the results of the water control and the disinfectant at the end of the exposure time. All experiments were done in triplicate under clean conditions. Means of lg reduction were compared with the unpaired t-test, p<0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Sufficient bactericidal activity according the VAH test requirements of at least 5 lg was found with both methods in 16 data sets of 24 data sets in total, and insufficient bactericidal activity of less than 5 lg was found with both methods in 7 data sets. In one data set, the mean lg reduction was above 5 lg with the microscale method and <5 lg with the VAH method, with no significant difference between the data sets (p=0.3096; 0.2% glutaral, 1 min, ). A sufficient yeasticidal activity of at least 4 lg was found with both methods in one data set, an insufficient yeasticidal activity of less than 4 lg was found with both methods in 8 data sets. With one exception, no significant differences were detected between the two methods below the efficacy threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The microscale quantitative suspension test proved to provide results similar to those of VAH method 9 when the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaralwas evaluated, with 32 out of 33 evaluations yielding consistent results in terms of efficacy. Its suitability should be confirmed with additional bacterial species, additional biocidal active substances and in other laboratories.

摘要

目的

通过测定戊二醛的杀菌和杀酵母活性,评估一种新开发的微量定量悬液试验,并与现有的标准悬液试验进行比较,以此作为提高消毒剂测试可持续性的一个步骤。

方法

按照VAH方法9(等同于EN 13727)的定量悬液试验的测试原理,使用8.0 mL产品测试溶液、1.0 mL有机负荷和1.0 mL测试悬液进行标准悬液试验。此外,在96孔板中进行微量悬液试验,使用160 μL产品测试溶液、20 μL有机负荷和20 μL测试悬液。ATCC 6538、ATCC 15442和ATCC 10231作为测试微生物。戊二醛在浓度为0.05%、0.1%、0.2%和0.3%时进行测试,暴露时间为1、5和15分钟。聚山梨酯80(30 g/L)、卵磷脂(9 g/L)、L-组氨酸(1 g/L)和甘氨酸(10 g/L)用作经过验证的中和剂。消毒剂-中和剂混合物经系列稀释后,平板在36°C下孵育48小时(细菌)或在30°C下孵育72小时(酵母),并计算菌落形成单位(cfu)。lg减少量计算为暴露时间结束时水对照和消毒剂结果之间的差值。所有实验均在清洁条件下重复进行三次。lg减少量的平均值采用非配对t检验进行比较,p<0.05被认为具有显著性。

结果

在总共24个数据集中的16个数据集中,两种方法均发现根据VAH试验要求具有至少5 lg的足够杀菌活性,在7个数据集中两种方法均发现杀菌活性不足,小于5 lg。在一个数据集中,微量方法的平均lg减少量高于5 lg,而VAH方法的平均lg减少量<5 lg,数据集之间无显著差异(p=0.3096;0.2%戊二醛,1分钟,酵母)。在一个数据集中,两种方法均发现具有至少4 lg的足够杀酵母活性,在8个数据集中两种方法均发现杀酵母活性不足,小于4 lg。除一个例外,在效力阈值以下两种方法之间未检测到显著差异。

结论

在评估戊二醛的杀菌和杀酵母活性时,微量定量悬液试验证明提供的结果与VAH方法9相似,在33次评估中有32次在效力方面产生一致的结果。其适用性应通过其他细菌种类、其他生物杀灭活性物质以及在其他实验室进行确认。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/85e3c4661f46/HIC-19-03-g-005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/4bbf94d33c0b/HIC-19-03-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/c4b5a7785acb/HIC-19-03-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/49ff8583991c/HIC-19-03-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/e074a9a4fe49/HIC-19-03-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/59873dda8004/HIC-19-03-g-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/73d8c7c819da/HIC-19-03-g-004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/85e3c4661f46/HIC-19-03-g-005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/4bbf94d33c0b/HIC-19-03-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/c4b5a7785acb/HIC-19-03-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/49ff8583991c/HIC-19-03-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/e074a9a4fe49/HIC-19-03-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/59873dda8004/HIC-19-03-g-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/73d8c7c819da/HIC-19-03-g-004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd2/10884837/85e3c4661f46/HIC-19-03-g-005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a microscale quantitative suspension test to determine the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaral - one step to improve sustainability in disinfectant testing.评估一种微量定量悬浮试验,以确定戊二醛的杀菌和杀酵母活性——改进消毒剂测试可持续性的一步。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Jan 30;19:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000458. eCollection 2024.
2
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
3
Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.两种测试方法用于测定三种常用卫生手消毒酒精擦手液充分抗菌活性的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Nov;55(3):220-5. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00255-x.
4
[Sensitivity to disinfectants of Candid albicans strains isolated from the hospital environment].[从医院环境中分离出的白色念珠菌菌株对消毒剂的敏感性]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1998;49(1):73-86.
5
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
6
Preliminary Efficacy Testing of the Disinfectant MicrobeCare XLP for Potential Use in Military Operational Environments.用于军事作战环境的消毒剂MicrobeCare XLP的初步功效测试
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e348-e353. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy039.
7
Bactericidal activity of 40 potential disinfectant inactivators.40种潜在消毒剂灭活剂的杀菌活性。
Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1978 Dec;167(5-6):528-34.
8
[Antiseptic effect of compound lysostaphin disinfectant and its preventive effect on infection of artificial dermis after graft on full-thickness skin defect wound in rats].[复方溶葡萄球菌酶消毒剂的抗菌效果及其对大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面植皮后人工真皮感染的预防作用]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;34(4):225-232. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.007.
9
Bactericidal Activity of Ready-To-Use Alcohol-Based Commercial Wipes According to EN 16615 Carrier Standard.根据 EN 16615 载体标准,即用型酒精商业湿巾的杀菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;16(18):3475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183475.
10
Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis to chemicals.
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2018 Winter;67(3):122-128.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability in Healthcare: Perspectives and Reflections Regarding Laboratory Medicine.医疗保健中的可持续性:检验医学的观点与思考。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;41(2):139-144. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.2.139.
2
Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.两种测试方法用于测定三种常用卫生手消毒酒精擦手液充分抗菌活性的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Nov;55(3):220-5. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00255-x.
3
Statistical analysis of a micromethod in an interlaboratory test.
实验室间测试中一种微量方法的统计分析。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Apr;205(3):193-204. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00148.
4
An in-vitro evaluation of the activity of chlorine against environmental and nosocomial isolates of Aeromonas hydrophila.氯对嗜水气单胞菌环境分离株和医院分离株活性的体外评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Jan;41(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90036-1.
5
An in-vitro evaluation of the activity of povidone-iodine against nosocomial bacterial strains.聚维酮碘对医院内细菌菌株活性的体外评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1996 Nov;34(3):217-22. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(96)90069-9.
6
Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of European suspension test methods for antimicrobial activity of disinfectants and antiseptics.消毒剂和防腐剂抗菌活性欧洲悬液试验方法的重复性和再现性评估。
J Appl Bacteriol. 1992 Jul;73(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04975.x.
7
A collaborative study on the repeatability and the reproducibility of the Dutch standard-suspension-test for the evaluation of disinfectants.一项关于荷兰消毒剂评估标准悬浮试验的可重复性和再现性的合作研究。
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Aug;164(5-6):521-48.
8
A collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test, the in vitro test, for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants.一项关于新型定量悬液试验(体外试验)的合作研究,用于评估化学消毒剂的杀菌活性。
Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1979 Jun;168(5-6):463-79.