• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 EN 16615 载体标准,即用型酒精商业湿巾的杀菌活性。

Bactericidal Activity of Ready-To-Use Alcohol-Based Commercial Wipes According to EN 16615 Carrier Standard.

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Oczki 3, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland.

Laboratory of Combating Infectious Agents and Biological Contaminations, Department of Bacteriology and Biocontamination Control, National Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, ul. Chocimska 24; 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;16(18):3475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183475.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16183475
PMID:31540503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6766060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of ready-to-use disinfectant wipes was previously assessed in standardized suspension tests, which were inadequate because they ignored that the wipes are rubbed against a surface. Thus, we assessed the effectiveness of commercially available disinfectant wipes impregnated with an alcoholic solution according to the 16615 standard, which includes a test with mechanical action.

METHODS

According to the EN 16615 standard, under clean conditions, four squares (5cm x 5 cm), placed next to one another, were marked on a test surface. , and were inoculated on the leftmost square, and a wipe impregnated with an alcoholic solution was placed to the left of that square. Then, the wipe was pressed with a 2.5 kg weight and moved to the right and back to the left. After contact times of 1, 5, 10, or 15 minutes, we measured the reduction in bacterial load.

RESULTS

Alcohol-based ready-to-use commercial wipes did not show sufficient bactericidal activity at the contact times of 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes. Wipes containing propan-1-ol and a mixture of propan-1-ol and propan-2-ol were active against at the contact times of 1 minute and 15 minutes. None of the examined wipes were active against or .

CONCLUSION

Bactericidal parameters of ready-to-use disinfectant wipes should be determined in surface tests, in addition to suspension tests, because suspension tests do not simulate the conditions under which disinfectant wipes are used in practice.

摘要

背景

此前,即用型消毒剂擦拭布的有效性已在标准化悬浮试验中进行了评估,但这些试验并不充分,因为它们忽略了擦拭布与表面的摩擦。因此,我们根据包含机械作用测试的 16615 标准评估了浸渍有酒精溶液的市售消毒剂擦拭布的有效性。

方法

根据 EN 16615 标准,在清洁条件下,在测试表面上标记四个相邻的 5cm x 5cm 正方形。在最左边的正方形上接种 和 ,并在其左侧放置浸渍有酒精溶液的擦拭布。然后,用 2.5 公斤的重量将擦拭布压下,并向左和向右移动。在 1、5、10 或 15 分钟的接触时间后,我们测量细菌负荷的减少量。

结果

在 1、5、10 和 15 分钟的接触时间内,基于酒精的即用型商用擦拭布没有显示出足够的杀菌活性。含有丙-1-醇和丙-1-醇和丙-2-醇混合物的擦拭布在 1 分钟和 15 分钟的接触时间内对 有效。检查的擦拭布均对 或 无效。

结论

除悬浮试验外,还应在表面试验中确定即用型消毒剂擦拭布的杀菌参数,因为悬浮试验不能模拟消毒剂擦拭布在实际使用中的条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/5584a4706eb2/ijerph-16-03475-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/2ae4580b69e4/ijerph-16-03475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/f2ec13730693/ijerph-16-03475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/4c791a9eb0ba/ijerph-16-03475-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/5584a4706eb2/ijerph-16-03475-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/2ae4580b69e4/ijerph-16-03475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/f2ec13730693/ijerph-16-03475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/4c791a9eb0ba/ijerph-16-03475-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/013e/6766060/5584a4706eb2/ijerph-16-03475-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bactericidal Activity of Ready-To-Use Alcohol-Based Commercial Wipes According to EN 16615 Carrier Standard.根据 EN 16615 载体标准,即用型酒精商业湿巾的杀菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;16(18):3475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183475.
2
Evaluation of the virucidal efficacy of disinfectant wipes with a test method simulating practical conditions.模拟实际情况的试验方法评估消毒湿巾的病毒杀灭效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jul 16;8:121. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0569-4. eCollection 2019.
3
Bactericidal Efficacy of Hydrogen Peroxide-Based Disinfectants Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria on Stainless Steel Surfaces.基于过氧化氢的消毒剂对不锈钢表面革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的杀菌效果
J Food Sci. 2017 Oct;82(10):2351-2356. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13790. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
Application of EN 16615 (4-Field Test) for the Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Selected Commercial and Self-Made Disinfectant Wipes.应用EN 16615(四场试验)评估所选商用和自制消毒湿巾的抗菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115932.
5
Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review.消毒剂浸渍湿巾用于医院表面消毒的效果:综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 19;8:139. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0595-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis show different sensitivities to typical biocidal agents used for disinfection.屎肠球菌、粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对用于消毒的典型杀菌剂表现出不同的敏感性。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Dec;103(4):435-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of five products for surgical hand disinfection according to prEN 12054 and prEN 12791.根据prEN 12054和prEN 12791对五种外科手消毒产品的杀菌效果进行评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 May;54(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00039-2.
8
New commercial wipes inhibit the dispersion and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.新型商用湿巾可抑制金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的分散和黏附。
J Appl Microbiol. 2024 Sep 2;135(9). doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae234.
9
The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. IV. The AOAC use-dilution method and the Kelsey-Sykes test.表面消毒剂杀菌活性的评估。IV. AOAC使用稀释法和凯尔西-赛克斯试验。
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1992 Feb;192(5):432-7.
10
Cross-contamination by disinfectant towelettes varies by product chemistry and strain.消毒湿巾的交叉污染因产品化学性质和菌株而异。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 24;9(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00797-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Compositional factors driving antibacterial efficacy in healthcare wet wipe products.推动医疗湿巾产品抗菌功效的成分因素。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Apr 28;16:1582630. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1582630. eCollection 2025.
2
Contact time has limited impact on the efficacy of disinfectant towelettes when tested under conditions reflective of realistic use.接触时间对符合实际使用情况的条件下测试的消毒湿巾的功效影响有限。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Jul 16;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01266-4.
3
Application of EN 16615 (4-Field Test) for the Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Selected Commercial and Self-Made Disinfectant Wipes.

本文引用的文献

1
Interlaboratory reproducibility of a test method following 4-field test methodology to evaluate the susceptibility of Clostridium difficile spores.4 野测试方法评估艰难梭菌孢子易感性的测试方法的实验室间重现性
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Isopropanol at 60% and at 70% are effective against 'isopropanol-tolerant' Enterococcus faecium.60%和 70%的异丙醇可有效杀灭“耐异丙醇”粪肠球菌。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e88-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Impact of test protocols and material binding on the efficacy of antimicrobial wipes.
应用EN 16615(四场试验)评估所选商用和自制消毒湿巾的抗菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115932.
测试方案和材料结合对消毒湿巾功效的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e25-e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Disinfectant wipes are appropriate to control microbial bioburden from surfaces: use of a new ASTM standard test protocol to demonstrate efficacy.消毒湿巾适用于控制表面的微生物生物负载:采用新的 ASTM 标准测试方案来证明其有效性。
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Dec;91(4):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Pathogen transfer and high variability in pathogen removal by detergent wipes.洗涤剂湿巾的病原体转移及病原体去除的高度变异性。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):724-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Evaluation of a disinfectant wipe intervention on fomite-to-finger microbial transfer.对消毒剂擦拭干预措施对污染物到手指微生物转移的效果评估。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3113-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04235-13. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
7
The role of surface disinfection in infection prevention.表面消毒在感染预防中的作用。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013 Apr 29;8(1):Doc10. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000210. eCollection 2013.
8
The crucial role of wiping in decontamination of high-touch environmental surfaces: review of current status and directions for the future.擦拭在高接触环境表面去污中的关键作用:当前状况回顾及未来方向。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 May;41(5 Suppl):S97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.032.
9
The role played by contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens.污染表面在医院感染病原体传播中的作用。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;32(7):687-99. doi: 10.1086/660363.
10
Role of hospital surfaces in the transmission of emerging health care-associated pathogens: norovirus, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter species.医院环境表面在新发的医院相关性病原体传播中的作用:诺如病毒、艰难梭菌和不动杆菌属。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Jun;38(5 Suppl 1):S25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.04.196.