Loewe Micha Frederic, Doll-Nikutta Katharina, Stiesch Meike, Schwestka-Polly Rainer
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Lower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development (NIFE), Stadtfelddamm 34, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00515-4.
Acidification by bacterial biofilms at the bracket/tooth interface is one of the most common problems in fixed orthodontic treatments, which can lead to white spot lesions (WSL) and caries. As lingual brackets were shown to exhibit reduced WSL formation clinically, the aim of this in situ study was to compare initial intraoral biofilm formation and acidification on bracket-like specimens placed buccally and palatally in the upper jaw as a possible cause for this observation.
Intraoral biofilm was collected from splints equipped with buccally and palatally exposed test specimens, which were worn by 12 volunteers for a total of 48 h. The test specimens consisted of standard bracket material cylinders on top of a hydroxyapatite disc to represent the bracket/tooth interface. They were analyzed for three-dimensional biofilm volume and live/dead distribution by fluorescence staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy as well as for acidification by fluorescence-based pH ratiometry.
Similar general biofilm morphology with regard to volume and viability could be detected for buccally and palatally exposed specimens. For pH values, biofilms from both positions showed increased acidification at the bottom layer. Interestingly, the pH value at the top layers of the biofilms was slightly lower on palatally than on buccally exposed specimens, which may likely be due to anatomic conditions.
Based on the results of this study, initial intraoral biofilm formation and acidification is almost similar on the bracket material/biomimetic tooth interface when placed buccally or palatally in the upper jaw. As lingual brackets were shown to exhibit reduced WSL formation clinically, future studies should investigate further factors like bracket geometry.
在固定正畸治疗中,牙托与牙齿界面处细菌生物膜的酸化是最常见的问题之一,这可能导致白斑病变(WSL)和龋齿。由于临床研究表明舌侧托槽可减少WSL的形成,本原位研究的目的是比较在上颌颊侧和腭侧放置的类似托槽标本上的初始口腔内生物膜形成和酸化情况,以探究这一现象的可能原因。
从配备有颊侧和腭侧暴露测试标本的夹板上收集口腔内生物膜,12名志愿者佩戴夹板共48小时。测试标本由位于羟基磷灰石圆盘顶部的标准托槽材料圆柱体组成,以代表托槽与牙齿的界面。通过荧光染色和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析其三维生物膜体积和活/死分布,并通过基于荧光的pH比率法分析酸化情况。
颊侧和腭侧暴露的标本在生物膜体积和活力方面具有相似的总体形态。对于pH值,两个位置的生物膜在底层均显示出酸化增加。有趣的是,腭侧暴露标本的生物膜顶层pH值略低于颊侧暴露标本,这可能是由于解剖条件所致。
基于本研究结果,上颌颊侧或腭侧放置的托槽材料/仿生牙齿界面上的初始口腔内生物膜形成和酸化情况几乎相似。由于临床研究表明舌侧托槽可减少WSL的形成,未来的研究应进一步探究托槽几何形状等因素。