Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建的男性精英足球运动员在神经认知挑战下落地时的膝关节生物力学

Knee Biomechanics During Neurocognitively Challenged Drop Landings in Male Elite Soccer Players with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

作者信息

Gholipour Aghdam Ghazal Mohammad, Alizadeh Mohammad Hossein, Minoonejad Hooman, Shirzad Elham, Wilke Jan

机构信息

Department of Sports Injury and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Movement Sciences, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstraße 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2024 Feb 27;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00685-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reactive decision-making during athletic movement has been demonstrated to evoke unfavorable biomechanics associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. However, the current evidence is based on assessments of healthy individuals. We aimed to investigate unplanned jump landing kinetics and knee kinematics in ACL-reconstructed (ACLR) and non-injured athletes.

METHODS

A total of 30 male professional soccer players (n = 15 ACLR after return to play, n = 15 matched controls) performed six drop landings onto a force plate. As a neurocognitive challenge requiring decision-making, a diode flashing in randomly selected colors indicated the requested landing location. Knee joint kinematics (flexion, valgus and tibial rotation angles) assessed with a 10-camera motion capture system, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), time to stabilization (TTS) and length of the center of pressure (COP) trace (all analyzed from force plate data) were calculated. Cognitive function was assessed using the CNS Vital Signs battery.

RESULTS

The ACLR group produced lower knee flexion angles than the control group (median [interquartile range] 50.00° [6.60] vs. 55.20° [4.45], p = .02). In addition, path length of the center of pressure (379 mm [56.20] vs. 344 mm [37.00], p = .04) and ground reaction force (3.21 N/kg [0.66] vs. 2.87 N/kg [0.48], p = .01) were higher for the ACLR group. No differences were found for knee valgus (p = .96), tibial rotation (p = .83) and TTS (p = .82). ACLR participants scored lower for reaction time (p = .02) and processing speed (p = .01). Unfavorable knee biomechanics were more often related to cognitive function in the ACLR group than in the control group (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired reactive decision-making during athletic movement may contribute to the high re-injury risk in individuals with ACLR. Prospective studies confirming potential cause-effect relationships are warranted.

摘要

背景

运动过程中的反应性决策已被证明会引发与前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂相关的不良生物力学变化。然而,目前的证据是基于对健康个体的评估。我们旨在研究ACL重建(ACLR)运动员和未受伤运动员的意外跳落动力学和膝关节运动学。

方法

共有30名男性职业足球运动员(n = 15名恢复比赛后的ACLR运动员,n = 15名匹配的对照组)在测力板上进行了6次下落着陆。作为一项需要决策的神经认知挑战,以随机选择颜色闪烁的二极管指示所需的着陆位置。使用10台摄像机的运动捕捉系统评估膝关节运动学(屈曲、外翻和胫骨旋转角度),计算垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)、稳定时间(TTS)和压力中心(COP)轨迹长度(均根据测力板数据进行分析)。使用CNS Vital Signs电池评估认知功能。

结果

ACLR组产生的膝关节屈曲角度低于对照组(中位数[四分位间距]50.00°[6.60]对55.20°[4.45],p = 0.02)。此外,ACLR组的压力中心路径长度(379 mm [56.20]对344 mm [37.00],p = 0.04)和地面反作用力(3.21 N/kg [0.66]对2.87 N/kg [0.48],p = 0.01)更高。膝关节外翻(p = 0.96)、胫骨旋转(p = 0.83)和TTS(p = 0.82)未发现差异。ACLR参与者的反应时间(p = 0.02)和处理速度(p = 0.01)得分较低。与对照组相比,ACLR组中不良的膝关节生物力学与认知功能的相关性更高(p < 0.05)。

结论

运动过程中反应性决策受损可能导致ACLR个体的再损伤风险较高。有必要进行前瞻性研究以证实潜在的因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eaf/10899557/aa9af92a52eb/40798_2024_685_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验