Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Pain. 2024 Aug;25(8):104502. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.016. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) by definition, frequently co-occur, perhaps reflecting their shared etiologies. Their overlapping nature presents a methodological challenge, possibly masking associations between COPCs and health outcomes attributable to either general or specific processes. To address this challenge, we used population-based cohort data to evaluate the predictive validity of a bifactor model of 9 self-reported COPCs by assessing its association with incident pain-related clinical diagnoses; pain-relevant pharmacotherapy; and other health outcomes. We obtained data from a 2005 to 2006 study of Swedish adult twins linked with health data from nationwide registers through 2016 (N = 25,418). We then fit a bifactor model comprising a general COPC factor and 2 independent specific factors measuring pain-related somatic symptoms and neck and shoulder pain. Accounting for age, biological sex, and cancer, the general factor was associated with increased risk of all pain-related outcomes (eg, COPC diagnosis adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [1.62, 1.81]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.72 [1.60, 1.85]), and overdose and mortality (eg, all-cause mortality aOR, 1.25 [1.09, 1.43]). The somatic symptoms specific factor was associated with pain-relevant pharmacotherapy (eg, prescribed opioids aOR, 1.25 [1.15, 1.36]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.95 [1.70, 2.23]), and overdose (eg, nonfatal overdose aOR, 1.66 [1.31, 2.10]). The neck and shoulder pain-specific factor was weakly and inconsistently associated with the outcomes. Findings provide initial support for the validity and utility of a general-factor model of COPCs as a tool to strengthen understanding of co-occurrence, etiology, and consequences of chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents associations between a novel measurement model of COPCs and various health outcomes. Findings provide support for measuring pain across multiple domains rather than only measuring pain specific to one physical location in both research and clinical contexts.
慢性重叠性疼痛病症(COPCs)根据定义,通常会同时发生,这可能反映了它们共同的病因。它们重叠的性质提出了一个方法学上的挑战,可能掩盖了 COPCs 与健康结果之间的关联,而这些关联归因于一般或特定的过程。为了解决这一挑战,我们使用基于人群的队列数据,通过评估其与新发疼痛相关临床诊断、与疼痛相关的药物治疗以及其他健康结果之间的关联,来评估 9 种自我报告的 COPCs 双因素模型的预测有效性。我们从瑞典成年双胞胎的一项 2005 年至 2006 年的研究中获得数据,这些双胞胎通过与全国范围内登记处的健康数据链接,可追溯到 2016 年(N=25418)。然后,我们拟合了一个双因素模型,包括一个一般 COPC 因素和 2 个独立的特定因素,分别测量与疼痛相关的躯体症状以及颈部和肩部疼痛。在考虑年龄、生物性别和癌症的情况下,一般因素与所有与疼痛相关的结果的风险增加有关(例如,COPC 诊断调整后的优势比[aOR],1.71;95%置信区间[1.62,1.81]),大多数与心理健康相关的结果(例如,抑郁症 aOR,1.72[1.60,1.85]),以及过量用药和死亡率(例如,全因死亡率 aOR,1.25[1.09,1.43])。躯体症状特定因素与与疼痛相关的药物治疗有关(例如,处方阿片类药物 aOR,1.25[1.15,1.36]),与大多数与心理健康相关的结果有关(例如,抑郁症 aOR,1.95[1.70,2.23]),以及过量用药(例如,非致命性过量用药 aOR,1.66[1.31,2.10])。颈部和肩部疼痛特定因素与这些结果的关联较弱且不一致。研究结果初步支持 COPCs 一般因素模型的有效性和实用性,该模型可作为一种工具,加强对慢性疼痛的共病、病因和后果的理解。观点:本文介绍了一种新型 COPCs 测量模型与各种健康结果之间的关联。研究结果支持在研究和临床环境中,跨多个领域测量疼痛,而不仅仅是测量一个身体部位的疼痛。