Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Department of Built Environment, Urbanism and Urban Architecture, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18195-5.
While community-level interventions for promoting active ageing have received increasing attention and there is a trend to leverage technology to support traditional physical or social interventions, little hands-on guidance exists for designing these integral interventions. This study aimed to examine the interventions reported in the literature guided by Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) principles. The goal is to extract insights that inform future practices in co-designing integral interventions for active ageing.
The systematic review focused on community-level interventions promoting active ageing that integrated physical, social, and digital elements, i.e., integral interventions. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The included interventions were analysed abductively based on the CBPR principles.
A total of 13 studies were included, and 24 design considerations were generated under eight categories. Further reflection identified the interrelated nature of these design considerations and pinpointed the gaps in current research. This study highlights the urgency and importance of sharing recruitment methods and resource allocation details, recording and reporting collaboration specifics, and disseminating findings to stakeholders beyond academia.
This study offers valuable insights and practical guidance to researchers and practitioners developing community-level integral interventions for active ageing. The findings also serve as a starting point for accumulating knowledge and practice in co-designing integral interventions for active ageing at the community level. The next crucial phase involves evaluating these design considerations within real-world cases to assess their applicability and identify potential areas for improvement.
虽然促进积极老龄化的社区层面干预措施越来越受到关注,并且有利用技术支持传统的身体或社会干预措施的趋势,但对于设计这些综合干预措施几乎没有实际指导。本研究旨在根据社区参与式研究(CBPR)原则检查文献中报道的干预措施。目的是提取信息,为积极老龄化的综合干预措施的共同设计提供未来实践的参考。
系统综述侧重于整合身体、社会和数字元素的社区层面促进积极老龄化的干预措施,即综合干预措施。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。根据 CBPR 原则对纳入的干预措施进行了无偏差分析。
共纳入 13 项研究,生成了 24 个设计考虑因素,分为 8 个类别。进一步的反思确定了这些设计考虑因素的相互关系,并指出了当前研究中的差距。本研究强调了分享招募方法和资源分配细节、记录和报告合作细节以及将研究结果传播给学术界以外的利益相关者的紧迫性和重要性。
本研究为研究人员和实践者提供了有价值的见解和实用指导,用于开发社区层面的积极老龄化综合干预措施。研究结果还为在社区层面共同设计积极老龄化的综合干预措施积累知识和实践提供了起点。下一个关键阶段是在实际案例中评估这些设计考虑因素,以评估其适用性并确定潜在的改进领域。