Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(3):575-587. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230200.
Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming via trial-and-error warrants improvement to ensure swift achievement of optimal outcomes. The definition of a sweet spot for subthalamic DBS in Parkinson's disease (PD-STN-DBS) may offer such advancement.
This investigation examines the association of long-term motor outcomes with contact selection during monopolar review and different strategies for anatomically informed contact selection in a retrospective real-life cohort of PD-STN-DBS.
We compared contact selection based on a monopolar review (MPR) to multiple anatomically informed contact selection strategies in a cohort of 28 PD patients with STN-DBS. We employed a commercial software package for contact selection based on visual assessment of individual anatomy following two predefined strategies and two algorithmic approaches with automatic targeting of either the sensorimotor STN or our previously published sweet spot. Similarity indices between chronic stimulation and contact selection strategies were correlated to motor outcomes at 12 months follow-up.
Lateralized motor outcomes of chronic DBS were correlated to the similarity between chronic stimulation and visual contact selection targeting the dorsal part of the posterior STN (rho = 0.36, p = 0.007). Similar relationships could not be established for MPR or any of the other investigated strategies.
Our data demonstrates that a visual contact selection following a predefined strategy can be linked to beneficial long-term motor outcomes in PD-STN-DBS. Since similar correlations could not be observed for the other approaches to anatomically informed contact selection, we conclude that clear definitions and prospective validation of any approach to imaging-based DBS-programming is warranted.
通过反复试验进行常规的深部脑刺激(DBS)编程需要改进,以确保迅速实现最佳效果。亚丘脑 DBS 在帕金森病(PD-STN-DBS)中的最佳刺激点的定义可能提供这样的改进。
本研究通过回顾性真实队列研究,考察了在 PD-STN-DBS 中,单极审查时的触点选择以及不同解剖学触点选择策略与长期运动结果之间的关系。
我们比较了基于单极审查(MPR)的触点选择与基于视觉评估个体解剖结构的两种解剖学触点选择策略在 28 例 STN-DBS 的 PD 患者队列中的应用。我们采用了一种商业软件包,用于根据两个预设策略和两种算法方法(自动靶向感觉运动 STN 或我们之前发表的最佳刺激点)进行触点选择。慢性刺激和触点选择策略之间的相似性指数与 12 个月随访时的运动结果相关。
慢性 DBS 的偏侧运动结果与慢性刺激和视觉触点选择(靶向后 STN 的背侧部分)之间的相似性相关(rho=0.36,p=0.007)。对于 MPR 或任何其他研究策略,均无法建立类似的关系。
我们的数据表明,遵循预定义策略的视觉触点选择可以与 PD-STN-DBS 的长期有益运动结果相关。由于对于其他解剖学触点选择方法,我们无法观察到类似的相关性,因此我们得出结论,任何基于影像学的 DBS 编程方法都需要明确的定义和前瞻性验证。