• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎:剂量反应荟萃分析的系统评价

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of dose-response meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Tzu-Yin, Chou Shih-Hsiang, Shih Chia-Lung

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, 600, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2024 Feb 19;52:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.021. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.021
PMID:38435314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10904159/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the research was to conduct a systematic review of dose-response meta-analysis, examining the correlation between the energy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and clinical outcomes for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of three online databases - PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library - to collect relevant articles from their inception to May 2023. We included the articles that investigated the efficacy of ESWT in treating knee OA and were designed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The main outcomes were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for primary outcomes and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for secondary outcomes. We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to examine the correlation between the energy of ESWT and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Our study included a total of 7 RCTs (comprising 450 subjects) that met the inclusion criteria. We found a negative linear relationship between the doses of ESWT and WOMAC scores at the 1-week (p = 0.0398) and 4-week (p = 0.001) follow-up periods, but not at the 12-week follow-up period (p = 0.202). Furthermore, at the 4-week (p = 0.0477) and 12-week (p < 0.001) follow-up periods, a negative linear connection was found between the ESWT dose and VAS scores, but not at the 1-week follow-up period (p = 0.2268).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a dose-response connection between the energy of ESWT and clinical outcomes. This suggests that using higher energy levels of ESWT to treat knee OA could lead to greater improvement in clinical outcomes compared to using lower energy levels.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在对剂量反应荟萃分析进行系统评价,探讨体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)的能量与膝骨关节炎(OA)患者临床结局之间的相关性。

方法

我们对三个在线数据库——PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆——进行了系统评价,以收集从其创建到2023年5月的相关文章。我们纳入了研究ESWT治疗膝OA疗效且采用随机对照试验(RCT)设计的文章。主要结局采用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)进行测量作为主要结局,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量作为次要结局。我们进行了剂量反应荟萃分析,以检验ESWT能量与临床结局之间的相关性。

结果

我们的研究共纳入了7项符合纳入标准的RCT(包括450名受试者)。我们发现,在1周(p = 0.0398)和4周(p = 0.001)随访期,ESWT剂量与WOMAC评分之间存在负线性关系,但在12周随访期不存在(p = 0.202)。此外,在4周(p = 0.0477)和12周(p < 0.001)随访期,ESWT剂量与VAS评分之间存在负线性关系,但在1周随访期不存在(p = 0.2268)。

结论

我们的结果表明ESWT能量与临床结局之间存在剂量反应关系。这表明,与使用较低能量水平相比,使用较高能量水平的ESWT治疗膝OA可能会导致临床结局有更大改善。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of dose-response meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎:剂量反应荟萃分析的系统评价
J Orthop. 2024 Feb 19;52:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.021. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):822-835. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz262.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal versus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis-Randomized Controlled Study.聚焦式体外冲击波疗法与桡动脉体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较——随机对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 24;19(15):9001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159001.
4
Application and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的应用与疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Oct;18(4):2843-2850. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7897. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves pain and function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.体外冲击波疗法可改善膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛和功能:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.055. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Low-Dose Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.一项关于低剂量体外冲击波疗法对膝骨关节炎患者疗效的随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;100(9):1695-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Comparison of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy with Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Early Osteoarthritis of the Knees.体外冲击波疗法与非甾体类抗炎药及关节内注射透明质酸治疗早期膝关节骨关节炎的比较
Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 18;10(2):202. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020202.
8
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效Meta 分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 May;44(5):877-884. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04489-x. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
A systematic review of the use of shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis.冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 May 1;56:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.020. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis.用于治疗膝关节骨关节炎的物理治疗方法:一项网状Meta分析
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Apr 7;37(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03015-6.
2
A systematic review of the use of shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis.冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 May 1;56:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.020. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.径向体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的剂量相关性效应:一项随机对照试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 13;53(1):jrm00144. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2782.
2
Comparison of the effects between low- versus medium-energy radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial.低能量与中能量径向体外冲击波疗法对膝骨关节炎疗效的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 15;15(3):190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.04.003. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Comparison of the added effects of kinesio taping and extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise alone in knee osteoarthritis.肌内效贴布和体外冲击波疗法联合运动与单纯运动对膝骨关节炎附加效果的比较。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 May;38(5):661-669. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1780657. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效Meta 分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 May;44(5):877-884. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04489-x. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):822-835. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz262.
6
Comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and knee kinesio taping in early osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled trial.非甾体抗炎药与膝关节肌内效贴布治疗早期骨关节炎疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jul;23(3):666-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Application and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的应用与疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Oct;18(4):2843-2850. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7897. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Study Demonstrating Superiority of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Injection Over Hyaluronic Acid and Saline Control for Modification of Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms.一项随机对照单盲研究表明,羊膜悬浮同种异体移植注射在改善膝关节骨关节炎症状方面优于透明质酸和生理盐水对照。
J Knee Surg. 2019 Nov;32(11):1143-1154. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696672. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults.成人数字视觉模拟量表疼痛评分与传统纸质视觉模拟量表的验证
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Clinical and radiographic comparison of a single LP-PRP injection, a single hyaluronic acid injection and daily NSAID administration with a 52-week follow-up: a randomized controlled trial.单次富血小板血浆注射、单次透明质酸注射及每日非甾体抗炎药给药的临床与影像学比较并随访52周:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Aug 20;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10195-018-0501-3.