Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, China.
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 13;53(1):jrm00144. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2782.
To assess the dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain alleviation in knee osteoarthritis.
With the use of a 2?×?2 factorial randomized controlled design, 89 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups, which varied in terms of shock intensity (0.12 mJ/mm2, lower density, or 0.24 mJ/mm2, higher density) and shock number (2,000 impulses or 4,000 impulses), or to a placebo control. Each group received 4 sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, one week apart. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured on a visual analogue scale, and the secondary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Assessments were performed at baseline, after each session, and at 4-week follow-up.
Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant effect on the Pain score for intensity (p<0.001), with no effect for number (p=0.467) or the intensity?number interaction (p=0.536). Similar results were obtained for the WOMAC scores, except for an association between number and WOMAC score (p=0.036). At the 4-week follow-up, all treatment groups showed greater reductions in the Pain and WOMAC scores than the control group. In addition, scores decreased more at higher densities of shock intensity than at lower densities, while there was no significant difference between the 2,000- and 4,000-shock conditions.
Moderate-intensity radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was effective, and a higher density might be more efficacious in alleviating pain in knee osteoarthritis.
评估放射式体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛缓解的剂量相关性。
采用 2×2 析因随机对照设计,将 89 例膝骨关节炎患者分配至 4 种治疗组中的 1 种,各组的冲击波强度(0.12mJ/mm2,低密度或 0.24mJ/mm2,高密度)和冲击次数(2000 次或 4000 次)不同,或接受安慰剂对照。每组均接受 4 次放射式体外冲击波治疗,间隔 1 周。主要结局指标为视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量的疼痛强度,次要结局指标为西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分。评估在基线时、每次治疗后和 4 周随访时进行。
双向重复测量方差分析显示,强度对疼痛评分有显著影响(p<0.001),但对次数(p=0.467)或强度×次数交互作用(p=0.536)无影响。WOMAC 评分也得到了类似的结果,除了次数与 WOMAC 评分之间存在关联(p=0.036)。在 4 周随访时,所有治疗组的疼痛和 WOMAC 评分均较对照组显著降低。此外,高密度的冲击波强度降低效果优于低密度,而 2000 次和 4000 次冲击条件之间无显著差异。
中度强度放射式体外冲击波治疗有效,高密度可能更能有效缓解膝骨关节炎的疼痛。