Liao Po-Cheng, Chou Shih-Hsiang, Shih Chia-Lung
Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, 600, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.
J Orthop. 2024 May 1;56:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.020. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Previous studies assessed the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) among different situations. Thus, results from a meta-analysis regarding this topic may not be reliable due to heterogeneity.
A systematic review was conducted on three internet databases, namely Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase, gathering pertinent papers from their establishment to March 2024. The search phrases were as follows: "shockwave" OR "shock wave" OR "extracorporeal shockwave" OR "Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy [MeSH Term]" AND "knee" AND ("osteoarthritis" OR "arthritis" OR "arthritic" OR "osteoarthritis [MeSH term]").
Twenty-four articles (n = 888) were included, with the resulting conclusions demonstrating that ESWT was effective for knee OA compared with sham ESWT; however, ESWT was not effective for patients with severe knee OA. Patients receiving higher energy or higher shock number had significant improvement than those receiving lower energy or less shock number, respectively. Adding ESWT in isokinetic muscular strengthening exercises (IMSE) was more effective than IMSE alone. The efficacy of ESWT was better than other therapies, including intravenously applied prostacyclin and bisphosphonate, corticosteroid injection, kinesiotherapy, hyaluronic acid injection, platelet-rich plasma injection, and physiotherapy.
This review demonstrated that ESWT was effective for knee OA. Higher energy and more shock numbers could obtain better efficacy. ESWT could be used as a replacement for some other therapies.
先前的研究评估了体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在不同情况下对膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的疗效。因此,由于存在异质性,关于该主题的荟萃分析结果可能不可靠。
对三个互联网数据库,即考克兰图书馆、PubMed和Embase进行了系统评价,收集从建库至2024年3月的相关论文。检索词如下:“shockwave”或“shock wave”或“extracorporeal shockwave”或“体外冲击波疗法[医学主题词]”以及“膝关节”和(“骨关节炎”或“关节炎”或“关节病的”或“骨关节炎[医学主题词]”)。
纳入了24篇文章(n = 888),所得结论表明,与假体外冲击波疗法相比,体外冲击波疗法对膝关节骨关节炎有效;然而,体外冲击波疗法对重度膝关节骨关节炎患者无效。接受较高能量或较多冲击次数的患者分别比接受较低能量或较少冲击次数的患者有显著改善。在等速肌肉强化训练(IMSE)中加入体外冲击波疗法比单独进行IMSE更有效。体外冲击波疗法的疗效优于其他疗法,包括静脉应用前列环素和双膦酸盐、皮质类固醇注射、运动疗法、透明质酸注射、富血小板血浆注射和物理治疗。
本综述表明,体外冲击波疗法对膝关节骨关节炎有效。较高的能量和更多的冲击次数可获得更好的疗效。体外冲击波疗法可替代其他一些疗法。