School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04617-3.
Currently, there is no systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of digital interventions for healthy ageing and cognitive health of older adults. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of digital intervention studies for facilitating healthy ageing and cognitive health and further identify the considerations of its application to older adults.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were conducted across CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA guideline. All included studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Checklist by independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed using JBI SUMARI software to compare quantitative studies. Thematic analyses were used for qualitative studies and synthesised into the emerging themes.
Thirteen studies were included. Quantitative results showed no statistically significant pooled effect between health knowledge and healthy behaviour (I =76, p=0.436, 95% CI [-0.32,0.74]), and between cardiovascular-related health risks and care dependency I=0, p=0.426, 95% CI [0.90,1.29]). However, a statistically significant cognitive function preservation was found in older adults who had long-term use of laptop/cellphone devices and had engaged in the computer-based physical activity program (I=0, p<0.001, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21]). Qualitative themes for the considerations of digital application to older adults were digital engagement, communication, independence, human connection, privacy, and cost.
Digital interventions used in older adults to facilitate healthy ageing were not always effective. Health knowledge improvement does not necessarily result in health risk reduction in that knowledge translation is key. Factors influencing knowledge translation (i.e., digital engagement, human coaching etc) were identified to determine the intervention effects. However, using digital devices appeared beneficial to maintain older adults' cognitive functions in the longer term. Therefore, the review findings suggest that the expanded meaning of a person-centred concept (i.e., from social, environmental, and healthcare system aspects) should be pursued in future practice. Privacy and cost concerns of technologies need ongoing scrutiny from policy bodies. Future research looking into the respective health benefits can provide more understanding of the current digital intervention applied to older adults.
PROSPERO record ID: CRD42023400707 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=400707 .
目前,尚无系统评价调查数字干预措施对老年人健康老龄化和认知健康的有效性。本研究旨在进行系统评价,以评估数字干预措施促进健康老龄化和认知健康的有效性,并进一步确定其在老年人中应用的考虑因素。
根据 PRISMA 指南,对 CINAHL、Medline、ProQuest、Cochrane、Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库进行了系统评价和文献荟萃分析。独立评审员使用混合方法评估工具清单对所有纳入的研究进行评估。使用 JBI SUMARI 软件对定量研究进行荟萃分析。对定性研究进行主题分析,并综合为新兴主题。
纳入了 13 项研究。定量结果显示,健康知识与健康行为之间(I=76,p=0.436,95%CI[-0.32,0.74])和心血管相关健康风险与护理依赖之间(I=0,p=0.426,95%CI[0.90,1.29])均无统计学意义的汇总效应。然而,长期使用笔记本电脑/手机设备并参与基于计算机的体育活动计划的老年人,其认知功能保存具有统计学意义(I=0,p<0.001,95%CI[0.01,0.21])。考虑将数字应用于老年人的定性主题包括数字参与、沟通、独立性、人际联系、隐私和成本。
用于促进老年人健康老龄化的数字干预措施并不总是有效。知识的提高并不一定能降低健康风险,因为知识的转化是关键。确定影响知识转化的因素(即数字参与、人为指导等)可以确定干预效果。然而,长期使用数字设备似乎有利于保持老年人的认知功能。因此,审查结果表明,未来实践应追求以人为中心概念的扩展意义(即从社会、环境和医疗保健系统方面)。技术的隐私和成本问题需要政策机构的持续审查。未来研究关注各自的健康益处可以更好地理解当前应用于老年人的数字干预措施。
PROSPERO 记录 ID:CRD42023400707 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=400707 。