• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络分析在 CaRE 健康公平中心的应用:团队科学的完美展现。

Social network analysis of the CaRE health equity center: Team science in full display.

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar;17(3):e13747. doi: 10.1111/cts.13747.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13747
PMID:38445540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10915722/
Abstract

Cancer health disparities that exist in the Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino/x communities are scientific challenges, yet there are limited team science approaches to mitigate these challenges. This article's purpose is to evaluate the team science collaborations of the National Institutes of Health-funded Florida-California Cancer Research, Education & Engagement (CaRE ) Center partnership underscoring the inclusion of multidisciplinary team members and future under-represented minority (URM) cancer researchers. To understand our collaborative efforts, we conducted a social network analysis (SNA) of the CaRE Center partnership among University of Florida, Florida A&M University, and University of Southern California with data collected via the dimensions.ai application programming interface. We downloaded metadata for all publications associated with dimensions.ai IDs. The CaRE collaboration network increased over time as evidenced by accruing more external collaborators and more publishing of collaborative works. Degree centrality of key personnel was stable in each wave of the networks. CaRE key personnel averaged a total of 60.8 collaborators in 2018-2019 (SD = 57.4, minimum = 3, maximum = 221), and 65.8 collaborators in 2020-2021 (SD = 56.06, minimum = 4, maximum = 222). Betweenness was largely stable across all groups and waves. We observed a steady decline in transitivity, the probability that a pair of CaRE co-authors shared a third co-author, from 0.74 in 2018 to 0.47 in 2022. The SNA findings suggest that the CaRE Center partnership's publications show growth in team science collaborations with the inclusion of multidisciplinary team members from the three partner institutions and future URM cancer researchers who were mentored as trainees and early-stage investigators.

摘要

黑人和西班牙裔或拉丁裔/美籍社区中存在的癌症健康差距是科学挑战,但目前没有减轻这些挑战的团队科学方法。本文的目的是评估美国国立卫生研究院资助的佛罗里达州-加利福尼亚癌症研究、教育和参与(CaRE)中心伙伴关系的团队科学合作,强调包括多学科团队成员和未来代表性不足的少数族裔(URM)癌症研究人员。为了了解我们的合作努力,我们对佛罗里达大学、佛罗里达州农工大学和南加州大学之间的 CaRE 中心伙伴关系进行了社会网络分析(SNA),该分析使用 dimensions.ai 应用程序编程接口收集数据。我们下载了与 dimensions.ai ID 相关的所有出版物的元数据。随着时间的推移,CaRE 合作网络不断扩大,表现为外部合作者的增加和合作作品的增多。关键人员的度中心度在网络的每一波中都保持稳定。CaRE 关键人员在 2018-2019 年平均共有 60.8 名合作者(SD=57.4,最小值=3,最大值=221),在 2020-2021 年平均共有 65.8 名合作者(SD=56.06,最小值=4,最大值=222)。在所有群体和波次中,介数都基本稳定。我们观察到,CaRE 合著者之间共享第三位合著者的可能性(即三元组的概率)从 2018 年的 0.74 稳步下降到 2022 年的 0.47。SNA 研究结果表明,CaRE 中心伙伴关系的出版物表明,随着多学科团队成员的加入以及作为受训人员和早期研究人员的未来 URM 癌症研究人员的参与,团队科学合作不断发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/d4faa24cb0ac/CTS-17-e13747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/616ee7472a6b/CTS-17-e13747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/cea1cbad82ba/CTS-17-e13747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/e36627c5b0a6/CTS-17-e13747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/d4faa24cb0ac/CTS-17-e13747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/616ee7472a6b/CTS-17-e13747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/cea1cbad82ba/CTS-17-e13747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/e36627c5b0a6/CTS-17-e13747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f12/10915722/d4faa24cb0ac/CTS-17-e13747-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Social network analysis of the CaRE health equity center: Team science in full display.社交网络分析在 CaRE 健康公平中心的应用:团队科学的完美展现。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar;17(3):e13747. doi: 10.1111/cts.13747.
2
Florida-California Cancer Research, Education and Engagement (CaRE) Health Equity Center: Structure, Innovations, and Initial Outcomes.佛罗里达-加州癌症研究、教育和参与(CaRE)健康公平中心:结构、创新和初步成果。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231197878. doi: 10.1177/10732748231197878.
3
Developing a Novel Framework for an Undergraduate Cancer Research Education and Engagement Program for Underrepresented Minority Students: the Florida-California CaRE Research Education Core (REC) Training Program.为代表性不足的少数族裔学生开发本科癌症研究教育和参与计划的新框架:佛罗里达州-加利福尼亚州 CaRE 研究教育核心 (REC) 培训计划。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Oct;36(5):914-919. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01762-w.
4
Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis.通过合著网络分析评估研究合作
J Res Adm. 2018 Spring;49(1):76-99.
5
Florida-California Cancer Health Equity Center (CaRE) Community Scientist Research Advocacy Program.佛罗里达-加利福尼亚癌症健康公平中心(CaRE)社区科学家研究倡导计划。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1429-1439. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02351-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
6
Understanding and Addressing Cancer Disparities Among American Indians in North Carolina: The Southeastern American Indian Cancer Health Equity Partnership (SAICEP).了解并解决北卡罗来纳州美国印第安人的癌症差异:东南美国印第安人癌症健康公平伙伴关系(SAICEP)。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251336410. doi: 10.1177/10732748251336410. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
7
Detecting and analyzing research communities in longitudinal scientific networks.在纵向科学网络中检测和分析研究社群
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182516. eCollection 2017.
8
Using Bibliometric Data to Define and Understand Publishing Network Equity in Anesthesiology.使用文献计量学数据定义和理解麻醉学中的出版网络公平性。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 1;139(5):944-954. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006877. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
9
Identifying emerging research collaborations and networks: method development.识别新兴的研究合作与网络:方法开发
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):19-32. doi: 10.1177/0163278713501693. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
10
Technology-Based Interventions for Substance Use Treatment Among People Who Identify as African American or Black, Hispanic or Latino, and American Indian or Alaska Native: Scoping Review.针对非裔或黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔以及美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民中物质使用治疗的基于技术的干预措施:范围审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e53685. doi: 10.2196/53685.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing the Representation of Minority Students in the Biomedical Workforce: the ReTOOL Program.增加少数族裔学生在生物医学劳动力中的占比:重新调整计划。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):577-583. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1344-6.
2
A Separable Model for Dynamic Networks.动态网络的可分离模型
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2014 Jan 1;76(1):29-46. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12014.
3
Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared?从边缘到主流的基于社区的参与性研究:研究人员准备好了吗?
Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2633-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863.
4
Specification of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Computational Aspects.指数族随机图模型的规范:术语与计算方面
J Stat Softw. 2008;24(4):1548-7660. doi: 10.18637/jss.v024.i04.
5
Curved Exponential Family Models for Social Networks.社交网络的曲线指数族模型
Soc Networks. 2007 Mar;29(2):216-230. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.005.
6
The architecture of complex weighted networks.复杂加权网络的架构
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 16;101(11):3747-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400087101. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
7
NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.科学论文网络
Science. 1965 Jul 30;149(3683):510-5. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510.
8
Mixing patterns in networks.网络中的混合模式。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126. Epub 2003 Feb 27.