Microbiology of cystic fibrosis persons not chronically infected with : A quasi-experimental study on two different upper airways' sampling methods.

BACKGROUND

The upper airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) persons are an evolutionary niche where genetically adapted bacterial strains are selected for lung infection. The microbiological studies conducted up to now on the upper airways are not easily comparable.

METHODS

Using classical culture methods, we simultaneously studied the microbiological status of upper and lower airways in persons not chronically infected with . Each person had a single upper airways sampling and a concomitant lower airways sampling. Lower airways sampling was performed by oropharyngeal swab or sputum collection. Using a quasi-experimental design of study, we evaluated the performance of 2 different upper airways' sampling methods, nasal lavage according to method described by Mainz or nasal lavage with a rhino-set. Pain was measured with appropriate scales.

RESULTS

A total of 194 persons were enrolled in this study. Pathogenic flora was found in 128 (6.6%) of 194 upper airways samples and in 164 (84.6%) lower airways samples. A statistically significant difference between the upper airways and the lower airways was found in the isolation of and non-fermenter gram negatives. Nasal lavage according to Mainz resulted in the isolation of more non-fermenter gramnegatives than the rhino-set (p < 0.05). No differences were found in the pain caused bythe two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study population, cultures of the upper airway and lower airway differ in CF persons. In people sampled with nasal lavage according to Mainz more non-fermenter gram negatives were detected than with rhino-set. The two sampling methods were comparable with regard to the caused pain, nasal lavage according to Mainz method being quicker to perform.