• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小面积非致残性缺血性卒中静脉内使用阿替普酶:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Neuroscience Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):521-529. doi: 10.1177/23969873241237312. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1177/23969873241237312
PMID:38465589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minor ischemic stroke, defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-5 on admission, represents half of all acute ischemic strokes. The role of intravenous alteplase (IVA) among patients with minor stroke is inconclusive; therefore, we evaluated clinical outcomes of these patients treated with or without IVA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library until August 1, 2023. Inclusion was restricted to the English literature of studies that reported on minor nondisabling stroke patients treated with or without IVA. Odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% CIs were utilized using a random-effects model. Efficacy outcomes included rates of excellent (modified Rankin scale [mRS] of 0-1) and good (mRS of 0-2) functional outcome at 90 days. The main safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Five eligible studies, two RCTs and three observational studies, comprising 2764 patients (31.8% female) met inclusion criteria. IVA was administered to 1559 (56.4%) patients. Pooled analysis of the two RCTs revealed no difference between the two groups in terms of 90-days excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.76 [95% CI, 0.51-1.13];  = 0%) and sICH rates (OR 3.76 [95% CI, 0.61-23.20]). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of good functional outcomes, 90-day mortality, and 90-day stroke recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of minor nondisabling stroke suggests that IVA did not prove more beneficial compared to no-IVA.

摘要

背景

轻度缺血性卒中定义为入院时国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分 0-5,占所有急性缺血性卒中的一半。静脉注射阿替普酶(IVA)在轻度卒中患者中的作用尚无定论;因此,我们评估了这些患者接受或不接受 IVA 治疗的临床结局。

材料和方法

我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆,截至 2023 年 8 月 1 日。纳入标准仅限于报告了接受或不接受 IVA 治疗的轻度非致残性卒中患者的英语文献。使用随机效应模型计算了比值比(OR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。疗效结局包括 90 天的优秀(改良 Rankin 量表 [mRS] 为 0-1)和良好(mRS 为 0-2)功能结局的发生率。主要安全性结局是症状性颅内出血(sICH)。

结果

符合纳入标准的有五项研究,其中两项为 RCT,三项为观察性研究,共纳入 2764 例患者(31.8%为女性)。IVA 治疗组 1559 例(56.4%)。两项 RCT 的汇总分析显示,两组在 90 天的优秀功能结局(OR 0.76 [95%CI,0.51-1.13]; = 0%)和 sICH 发生率(OR 3.76 [95%CI,0.61-23.20])方面无差异。两组在良好功能结局、90 天死亡率和 90 天卒中复发率方面无显著差异。

结论

这项对轻度非致残性卒中的荟萃分析表明,与不使用 IVA 相比,IVA 并没有证明更有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e132/11418417/0d78ded3c542/10.1177_23969873241237312-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e132/11418417/0d78ded3c542/10.1177_23969873241237312-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e132/11418417/0d78ded3c542/10.1177_23969873241237312-img2.jpg

相似文献

1
Intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.小面积非致残性缺血性卒中静脉内使用阿替普酶:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):521-529. doi: 10.1177/23969873241237312. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
3
Intravenous Alteplase Versus Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Minor Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.静脉注射阿替普酶与最佳药物治疗对小卒中患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2024 Apr;55(4):883-892. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045495. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase in Adult Patients with Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性轻度缺血性脑卒中成人患者双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Aug;57(6):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-02994-z. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Efficacy and safety outcomes of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122912. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122912. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
6
Effect of Alteplase vs Aspirin on Functional Outcome for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Minor Nondisabling Neurologic Deficits: The PRISMS Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性脑卒中伴轻度非致残性神经功能缺损患者阿替普酶与阿司匹林治疗对功能结局的影响:PRISMS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):156-166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8496.
7
Sex Differences in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Patients with Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Study.双重抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者的性别差异:ARAMIS研究的二次分析
CNS Drugs. 2024 Aug;38(8):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01096-x. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
Dual antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for patients with minor ischemic stroke:A meta-analysis.轻度缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后双重抗血小板治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;238:108176. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108176. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗 4.5 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209903. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial.双联抗血小板与阿替普酶治疗小卒中伴与不伴大血管闭塞患者早期神经功能恶化:ARAMIS 试验的预设事后分析。
Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Mild Stroke with Admission NIHSS Score 0-3 Versus 4-5: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Randomized Trial.对于美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分0 - 3分与4 - 5分的轻度卒中患者,双重抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶对比:ARAMIS随机试验的二次分析
CNS Drugs. 2025 Oct;39(10):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01211-6. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
Intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving reperfusion treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性缺血性卒中患者未接受再灌注治疗时静脉注射替罗非班:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 May 13;16:1552658. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1552658. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The use of alteplase, although safe, does not offer clear clinical advantages when mild stroke is non-disabling.对于非致残性轻度中风,使用阿替普酶虽然安全,但并无明显的临床优势。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1212712. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1212712. eCollection 2023.
2
Best medical management versus intravenous thrombolysis for mild non-disabling ischemic stroke: A prospective noninferiority registry study.最佳药物治疗与静脉溶栓治疗轻度非致残性缺血性卒中的前瞻性非劣效性登记研究。
J Neurol Sci. 2023 Aug 15;451:120706. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120706. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.
The impact of anesthesia choice during thrombectomy for distal and medium vessel occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
远端和中血管闭塞性血栓切除术期间麻醉选择的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 21:15910199251342667. doi: 10.1177/15910199251342667.
4
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: development and update.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:进展与更新
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 28;7(3):fcaf164. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164. eCollection 2025.
5
Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute dizziness or imbalance and suspected ischemic stroke-systematic review.急性头晕或失衡且疑似缺血性卒中患者的静脉溶栓治疗——系统评价
J Neurol. 2025 Jan 3;272(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12782-7.
6
Prognosis and distribution of ischemic stroke with negative diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.扩散加权成像阴性的缺血性卒中的预后与分布:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1376439. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1376439. eCollection 2024.
双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
4
Reperfusion Treatments in Disabling Versus Nondisabling Mild Stroke due to Anterior Circulation Vessel Occlusion.前循环血管闭塞所致致残性与非致残性轻度卒中的再灌注治疗
Stroke. 2023 Mar;54(3):743-750. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041772. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Minor Non-Disabling Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Severe Stenosis or Occlusion Might Benefit from Thrombolysis.患有大血管严重狭窄或闭塞的轻度非致残性中风患者可能从溶栓治疗中获益。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):945. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070945.
6
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
A review of endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke.大血管闭塞性卒中的血管内治疗综述。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jul;13(7):623-630. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017321. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Varying Definitions of Minor Stroke: From a Large-Scale Nation-Wide Longitudinal Registry.不同定义的小卒中的临床特征和住院结局:来自一项大规模全国性纵向登记研究。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1253-1258. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031329. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Thrombectomy for Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Consensus Statement on Present Knowledge and Promising Directions.远端中等血管闭塞的血栓切除术:关于现有知识和未来方向的共识声明。
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2872-2884. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028956. Epub 2020 Aug 6.