• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国柏林赖尼肯多夫的新冠疫情隔离和检疫命令:数量、时长及对象?

COVID-19 isolation and quarantine orders in Berlin-Reinickendorf (Germany): How many, how long and to whom?

作者信息

Schumacher Jakob, Kühne Lisa, Brüssermann Sophia, Geisler Benjamin, Jäckle Sonja

机构信息

Local Public Health Agency, Berlin, Germany.

Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0271848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271848. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271848
PMID:38466677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10927113/
Abstract

Isolating COVID-19 cases and quarantining their close contacts can prevent COVID-19 transmissions but also inflict harm. We analysed isolation and quarantine orders by the local public health agency in Berlin-Reinickendorf (Germany) and their dependence on the recommendations by the Robert Koch Institute, the national public health institute. Between 3 March 2020 and 18 December 2021 the local public health agency ordered 24 603 isolations (9.2 per 100 inhabitants) and 45 014 quarantines (17 per 100 inhabitants) in a population of 266 123. The mean contacts per case was 1.9. More days of quarantine per 100 inhabitants were ordered for children than for adults: 4.1 for children aged 0-6, 5.2 for children aged 7-17, 0.9 for adults aged 18-64 and 0.3 for senior citizens aged 65-110. The mean duration for isolation orders was 10.2 and for quarantine orders 8.2 days. We calculated a delay of 4 days between contact and quarantine order. 3484 contact persons were in quarantine when they developed an infection. This represents 8% of all individuals in quarantine and 14% of those in isolation. Our study quantifies isolation and quarantine orders, shows that children had been ordered to quarantine more than adults and that there were fewer school days lost to isolation or quarantine as compared to school closures. Our results indicate that the recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute had an influence on isolation and quarantine duration as well as contact identification and that the local public health agency was not able to provide rigorous contact tracing, as the mean number of contacts was lower than the mean number of contacts per person known from literature. Additionally, a considerable portion of the population underwent isolation or quarantine, with a notable number of cases emerging during the quarantine period.

摘要

隔离新冠病毒病例并对其密切接触者进行检疫可以预防新冠病毒传播,但也会造成伤害。我们分析了德国柏林-赖尼肯多夫当地公共卫生机构发布的隔离和检疫命令,以及这些命令对国家公共卫生机构罗伯特·科赫研究所建议的依赖情况。在2020年3月3日至2021年12月18日期间,当地公共卫生机构在一个有266,123人的地区发布了24,603例隔离命令(每100名居民中有9.2例)和45,014例检疫命令(每100名居民中有17例)。每例病例的平均接触者人数为1.9人。每100名居民中,儿童被要求检疫的天数比成年人多:0至6岁儿童为4.1天,7至17岁儿童为5.2天,18至64岁成年人为0.9天,65至110岁老年人为0.3天。隔离命令的平均时长为10.2天,检疫命令的平均时长为8.2天。我们计算出接触与检疫命令之间有4天的延迟。3484名接触者在被检疫期间感染了新冠病毒。这占所有被检疫人员的8%,占所有被隔离人员的14%。我们的研究对隔离和检疫命令进行了量化,表明儿童被要求检疫的次数多于成年人,并且与学校关闭相比,因隔离或检疫而损失的上课天数更少。我们的结果表明,罗伯特·科赫研究所的建议对隔离和检疫时长以及接触者识别有影响,而且当地公共卫生机构无法进行严格的接触者追踪,因为平均接触者人数低于文献中已知的人均接触者人数。此外,相当一部分人口接受了隔离或检疫,在检疫期间出现了相当数量的病例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/d72f4fbac9a5/pone.0271848.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/46574c80dc62/pone.0271848.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/0f703656cfee/pone.0271848.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/d72f4fbac9a5/pone.0271848.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/46574c80dc62/pone.0271848.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/0f703656cfee/pone.0271848.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dc0/10927113/d72f4fbac9a5/pone.0271848.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 isolation and quarantine orders in Berlin-Reinickendorf (Germany): How many, how long and to whom?德国柏林赖尼肯多夫的新冠疫情隔离和检疫命令:数量、时长及对象?
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0271848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271848. eCollection 2024.
2
Quantifying the impact of quarantine duration on COVID-19 transmission.量化隔离时长对 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Elife. 2021 Feb 5;10:e63704. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63704.
3
Effectiveness of contact tracing and quarantine on reducing COVID-19 transmission: a retrospective cohort study.接触者追踪和隔离在减少 COVID-19 传播方面的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Contact Tracing Different Age Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Study From South-West Germany.新冠疫情期间对不同年龄组进行接触者追踪:来自德国西南部的回顾性研究
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Oct 29;16:e54578. doi: 10.2196/54578.
5
Pilot Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Secondary Transmission in Kindergarten Through Grade 12 Schools Implementing Mitigation Strategies - St. Louis County and City of Springfield, Missouri, December 2020.密苏里州圣路易斯县和斯普林菲尔德市幼儿园至 12 年级学校实施缓解策略后对 SARS-CoV-2 二次传播的初步调查-密苏里州圣路易斯县和斯普林菲尔德市,2020 年 12 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Mar 26;70(12):449-455. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7012e4.
6
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
7
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study.家庭二次感染 COVID-19 的发生率及其在中国广州的相关决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30471-0. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Volunteer-Staffed Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Initiative at an Urban Academic Medical Center.设计、实施和评估城市学术医疗中心的志愿者主导的病例调查和接触者追踪计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32110.
10
Efficacy and effectiveness of case isolation and quarantine during a growing phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland.在 COVID-19 疫情增长阶段,芬兰实施病例隔离和检疫的效果和效力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27227-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Global Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review.新冠疫苗犹豫的全球预测因素:一项系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 18;10(8):1349. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081349.
3
Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework.
新冠接触者追踪指标:快速范围界定综述和概念框架。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 28;17(2):e0264433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264433. eCollection 2022.
4
To isolate or not to isolate: the impact of changing behavior on COVID-19 transmission.隔离与否:行为改变对新冠病毒传播的影响
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12275-6.
5
Potential therapeutic options for COVID-19: an update on current evidence.针对 COVID-19 的潜在治疗选择:当前证据的更新。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Jan 13;27(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00626-3.
6
Safety and Seroconversion of Immunotherapies against SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.抗SARS-CoV-2感染免疫疗法的安全性和血清转化:一项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pathogens. 2021 Nov 24;10(12):1537. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121537.
7
Impact of School Closures on the Proportion of Children in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Example from the Winter Lockdown in Germany.学校关闭对 COVID-19 大流行期间儿童比例的影响:以德国冬季封锁为例。
Klin Padiatr. 2022 Mar;234(2):81-87. doi: 10.1055/a-1594-2818. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review.比较 COVID-19 疫苗在针对 SARS-CoV-2 及其关注变异株的特性、疗效和有效性方面的差异:一项叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Feb;28(2):202-221. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
9
The origins of SARS-CoV-2: A critical review.SARS-CoV-2 的起源:一项批判性回顾。
Cell. 2021 Sep 16;184(19):4848-4856. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
10
Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.系统评价比较非药物干预措施防治 COVID-19 有效性的实证研究。
J Infect. 2021 Sep;83(3):281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jun 20.