• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测有既往乳腺癌史的女性五年间间隔性二次乳腺癌风险。

Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):929-937. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae063.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae063
PMID:38466940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11160498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for women with a personal history of breast cancer. Risk prediction models that estimate mammography failures such as interval second breast cancers could help to tailor surveillance imaging regimens to women's individual risk profiles.

METHODS

In a cohort of women with a history of breast cancer receiving surveillance mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium in 1996-2019, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-penalized regression to estimate the probability of an interval second cancer (invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the 1 year after a negative surveillance mammogram. Based on predicted risks from this one-year risk model, we generated cumulative risks of an interval second cancer for the five-year period after each mammogram. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation in the overall cohort and within race and ethnicity strata.

RESULTS

In 173 290 surveillance mammograms, we observed 496 interval cancers. One-year risk models were well-calibrated (expected/observed ratio = 1.00) with good accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.64). Model performance was similar across race and ethnicity groups. The median five-year cumulative risk was 1.20% (interquartile range 0.93%-1.63%). Median five-year risks were highest in women who were under age 40 or pre- or perimenopausal at diagnosis and those with estrogen receptor-negative primary breast cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our risk model identified women at high risk of interval second breast cancers who may benefit from additional surveillance imaging modalities. Risk models should be evaluated to determine if risk-guided supplemental surveillance imaging improves early detection and decreases surveillance failures.

摘要

背景

对于有乳腺癌个人病史的女性,建议每年进行乳房 X 线筛查。能够预测乳腺癌筛查失败(如间期第二原发乳腺癌)的风险预测模型,可以帮助根据女性的个体风险特征定制监测成像方案。

方法

在 1996 年至 2019 年期间,在乳腺癌监测联盟中接受监测乳房 X 线摄影的患有乳腺癌病史的女性队列中,我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)惩罚回归来估计阴性监测乳房 X 线摄影后 1 年内发生间期第二原发癌(浸润性癌或导管原位癌)的概率。基于这一年期风险模型的预测风险,我们为每次乳房 X 线摄影后五年生成间期第二原发癌的累积风险。在整个队列和种族及民族亚组中,使用交叉验证评估模型性能。

结果

在 173290 次监测乳房 X 线摄影中,我们观察到 496 例间期癌。一年期风险模型具有良好的校准(预期/观察比值=1.00)和准确性(接受者操作特征曲线下面积=0.64)。模型性能在种族和民族组之间相似。五年期的中位累积风险为 1.20%(四分位距 0.93%-1.63%)。中位五年风险在诊断时年龄小于 40 岁或处于绝经前或围绝经期的女性以及雌激素受体阴性原发性乳腺癌女性中最高。

结论

我们的风险模型确定了患有高风险间期第二原发乳腺癌的女性,这些女性可能受益于额外的监测成像方式。应评估风险模型,以确定风险指导的补充监测成像是否可以提高早期检测率并降低监测失败率。

相似文献

1
Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer.预测有既往乳腺癌史的女性五年间间隔性二次乳腺癌风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):929-937. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae063.
2
Cumulative Risk Distribution for Interval Invasive Second Breast Cancers After Negative Surveillance Mammography.阴性监测乳腺钼靶摄影后间隔期侵袭性第二乳腺癌的累积风险分布。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2070-2077. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8267. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.间隔期浸润性第二原发性乳腺癌的五年风险
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 22;107(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv109. Print 2015 Jul.
4
Cumulative 6-Year Risk of Screen-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Screening Frequency.按筛查频率计算的累计 6 年筛检性导管原位癌风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0166.
5
Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population.在筛查性乳房 X 光摄影人群中建立的累积性晚期乳腺癌风险预测模型。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):676-685. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac008.
6
Risk factors for second screen-detected or interval breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer participating in mammography screening.有乳腺癌个人病史的女性在接受乳房 X 光筛查时,第二筛检出或间隔期乳腺癌的风险因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 May;22(5):946-61. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1208-T. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers.妇女健康倡议试验中筛查检出乳腺癌与间期乳腺癌患者的死亡率比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7227.
8
Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.在能力降低期间对乳腺钼靶检查进行基于风险的分流方法的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211974. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1974.
9
Sources of Disparities in Surveillance Mammography Performance and Risk-Guided Recommendations for Supplemental Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.监测乳房 X 光摄影术表现差异的来源,以及补充乳房成像的风险导向建议:一项模拟研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1531-1541. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0330.
10
Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.有早期乳腺癌个人病史的女性进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查的准确性和结果。
JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):790-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.188.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Updated Recommendations From the ACR.美国放射学会更新的高风险女性乳腺癌筛查推荐建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):902-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Performance of Statistical and Machine Learning Risk Prediction Models for Surveillance Benefits and Failures in Breast Cancer Survivors.统计和机器学习风险预测模型在乳腺癌幸存者监测获益和失败中的性能。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Apr 3;32(4):561-571. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0677.
3
Imaging Surveillance Options for Individuals With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Expert Panel Narrative Review.具有乳腺癌个人病史者的影像学监测选择:专家小组叙事性综述。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Dec;219(6):854-868. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27635. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population.在筛查性乳房 X 光摄影人群中建立的累积性晚期乳腺癌风险预测模型。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):676-685. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac008.
5
Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.2007-2016 年有乳腺癌个人病史女性的数字乳腺 X 线摄影与乳腺断层合成性能
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):290-300. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204581. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Assessing Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Prediction Models.评估乳腺癌风险:风险预测模型综述
J Breast Imaging. 2021 Feb 19;3(2):144-155. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab001. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
7
Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.将癌症风险预测模型转化为个性化癌症风险评估工具:成功的绊脚石和策略。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Breast Cancer Population Attributable Risk Proportions Associated with Body Mass Index and Breast Density by Race/Ethnicity and Menopausal Status.按种族/族裔和绝经状态划分的与体质指数和乳腺密度相关的乳腺癌人群归因风险比例。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct;29(10):2048-2056. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0358. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
A systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models.系统评价和个体化乳腺癌风险预测模型的质量评估。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):76-85. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0476-8. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Validation of the breast cancer surveillance consortium model of breast cancer risk.验证乳腺癌监测联盟模型的乳腺癌风险预测能力。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):519-523. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05167-2. Epub 2019 Feb 22.