Yoshiike Takuya, Kawamura Aoi, Utsumi Tomohiro, Matsui Kentaro, Kuriyama Kenichi
Department of Sleep-Wake Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8553 Japan.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2023 May 5;21(4):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Health effects of weekend catch-up sleep (CUS) could differ depending on both the ability to obtain sufficient sleep during weekdays and amount of weekend CUS required to compensate for sleep lost during the week. Using data from 3128 middle-aged (40-64 years) participants of the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the longitudinal association of these two aspects of sleep with all-cause mortality. CUS was calculated as the difference in self-reported habitual sleep duration between weekends and weekdays, and classified into no, short (1 h), and long (2 h or more) CUS. Polysomnography-measured total sleep time, representing the ability to obtain sufficient sleep, was classified into short (< 360 min) or normal (≥ 360 min) sleep durations. We estimated multivariable-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for six groups divided by the extent of CUS and sleep duration. Participants were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12.3 (11.3-13.5) years. Short weekend CUS with normal sleep duration was associated with lower mortality compared to no CUS with normal sleep duration (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.83). When stricter cutoffs were applied for sleep durations, while the protective effect of short CUS with normal sleep duration (≥ 390 min) was strengthened (HR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78), the harmful effect of short CUS with short sleep duration (< 330 min) emerged (HR, 1.84; 95% CI 1.08-3.14). Results highlight the importance of balancing sleep ability and CUS. Sufficient sleep may reduce weekday sleep debt and only a short CUS would be required on weekends, improving mortality in middle-aged adults.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-023-00460-6.
周末补觉(CUS)对健康的影响可能因工作日获得充足睡眠的能力以及弥补一周内睡眠不足所需的周末补觉量而有所不同。我们利用睡眠心脏健康研究中3128名中年(40 - 64岁)参与者的数据,研究了睡眠的这两个方面与全因死亡率之间的纵向关联。补觉量通过自我报告的周末和工作日习惯性睡眠时间的差异来计算,并分为无补觉、短补觉(1小时)和长补觉(2小时或更长时间)。多导睡眠图测量的总睡眠时间代表获得充足睡眠的能力,分为短睡眠(<360分钟)或正常睡眠(≥360分钟)时长。我们估计了按补觉量和睡眠时间程度划分的六组人群的多变量调整死亡率风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。参与者的随访时间中位数(四分位间距)为12.3(11.3 - 13.5)年。与正常睡眠时间但无补觉相比,正常睡眠时间的短周末补觉与较低的死亡率相关(HR,0.48;95% CI 0.27 - 0.83)。当对睡眠时间应用更严格的临界值时,虽然正常睡眠时间(≥390分钟)的短补觉的保护作用得到增强(HR,0.36;95% CI 0.17 - 0.78),但短睡眠时间(<330分钟)且短补觉的有害作用显现出来(HR,1.84;95% CI 1.08 - 3.14)。结果突出了平衡睡眠能力和补觉量的重要性。充足的睡眠可能会减少工作日的睡眠债务,周末只需要短时间补觉,从而改善中年成年人的死亡率。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s41105 - 023 - 00460 - 6获取的补充材料。