• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海湾合作委员会国家应对 COVID-19 大流行的政府对策:为未来的备灾提供的良好做法和经验教训。

Government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: good practices and lessons for future preparedness.

机构信息

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Risk and Actuarial Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Mar 15;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y
PMID:38486301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10941437/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically threatened the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries which have a large proportion of foreign workers. The governments of GCC countries have proactively implemented a comprehensive set of policy measures, and up to our knowledge, a systematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative evidence on the government response is still lacking. We summarized the GCC countries' government response and quantitatively measured that response using four indexes-the Government Response Index, the Stringency Index, the Vaccine Index, and the Initial Response Index, to analyse their response for future pandemic preparedness. Overall, the government response of all the GCC countries to the COVID-19 pandemic has been comprehensive, stringent, and timely. Notably, the GCC countries have implemented comprehensive vaccine policies. In addition, they have worked actively to protect foreign workers to improve their access to health services and secure their essential living conditions, regardless of their immigrant status. All the GCC countries dynamically adjusted their response to the evolving COVID-19 epidemiological burden and started to relax the stringency of the control policies after the Omicron wave, though the governments had different response magnitudes as measured by the four indexes. These findings have provided several important lessons for future pandemic response and preparedness for countries with similar economic, demographic, and health contexts in (1) prompt actions of containment and closure policies with dynamic adjusting, (2) strengthening health system policies, (3) comprehensive vaccination policies with universal access, (4) equitable and free access to testing, diagnosis, and treatment for all, and (5) strengthening the resilience of health systems.

摘要

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家构成了巨大威胁,这些国家有很大比例的外国工人。GCC 国家的政府已积极实施了一整套政策措施,但据我们所知,仍然缺乏对政府应对措施的定性和定量证据的系统分析。我们总结了 GCC 国家的政府应对措施,并使用政府应对指数、严格指数、疫苗指数和初始应对指数这四个指数对其应对措施进行了定量衡量,以分析其对未来大流行的防范。总的来说,所有 GCC 国家对 COVID-19 大流行的政府应对措施都是全面、严格和及时的。值得注意的是,GCC 国家实施了全面的疫苗政策。此外,他们积极努力保护外国工人,改善他们获得医疗服务的机会,并确保他们的基本生活条件,无论他们的移民身份如何。所有 GCC 国家都根据 COVID-19 流行病学负担的变化动态调整了应对措施,并在奥密克戎浪潮后开始放宽控制政策的严格程度,尽管各国在四项指数衡量的应对力度上有所不同。这些发现为未来具有类似经济、人口和卫生背景的国家的大流行应对和防范提供了一些重要经验教训,包括:(1)及时采取遏制和关闭政策,并进行动态调整;(2)加强卫生系统政策;(3)全面普及疫苗接种政策;(4)为所有人提供公平和免费的检测、诊断和治疗机会;(5)加强卫生系统的弹性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/460f589038d9/41256_2024_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/24d2f1c6c2d6/41256_2024_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/7bcfe0d86a5c/41256_2024_349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/f28f0aecfaf0/41256_2024_349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/460f589038d9/41256_2024_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/24d2f1c6c2d6/41256_2024_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/7bcfe0d86a5c/41256_2024_349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/f28f0aecfaf0/41256_2024_349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d10/10941437/460f589038d9/41256_2024_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: good practices and lessons for future preparedness.海湾合作委员会国家应对 COVID-19 大流行的政府对策:为未来的备灾提供的良好做法和经验教训。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Mar 15;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y.
2
Effects of strict containment policies on COVID-19 pandemic crisis: lessons to cope with next pandemic impacts.严格封控政策对 COVID-19 大流行危机的影响:应对下一次大流行影响的经验教训。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):2020-2028. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22024-w. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Vietnam government's experience and preliminary success.应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应:越南政府的经验与初步成功。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020502.
4
A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union.海湾合作委员会国家与欧盟应对新冠疫情策略的比较研究
Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100547. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100547. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Impact of the Covid pandemic on timely cancer diagnosis across European healthcare settings: a scoping review.新冠疫情对欧洲各医疗保健环境中癌症及时诊断的影响:范围综述。
Ann Ig. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):194-214. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2596. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
6
Public health matters: why is Latin America struggling in addressing the pandemic?公共卫生事务:为何拉丁美洲在应对大流行方面举步维艰?
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Mar;42(1):27-40. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00269-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Utility of the Comprehensive Health and Stringency Indexes in Evaluating Government Responses for Containing the Spread of COVID-19 in India: Ecological Time-Series Study.综合健康与严格指数在评估印度政府控制新冠疫情传播措施中的效用:生态时间序列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 10;9:e38371. doi: 10.2196/38371.
8
COVID-19 and migrants: lessons for pandemic preparedness from the Malaysian experience.新冠疫情与移民:马来西亚经验对大流行防范的启示。
Global Health. 2023 Nov 27;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00988-9.
9
The Israeli health system's rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.以色列卫生系统在 COVID-19 大流行期间的快速反应。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Mar 4;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00596-x.
10
Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore.通过跨部门合作迈向共同目标:新加坡从 SARS 到 COVID-19 的经验教训。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 21;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccination coverage and access among children and adult migrants and refugees in the Middle East and North African region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中东和北非地区儿童及成年移民与难民的疫苗接种覆盖率及可及性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 22;78:102950. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102950. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Gulf Countries: A Narrative Review.2019年冠状病毒病对海湾国家强迫症患者的影响:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67381. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Communication and Community Engagement During the Migrant Worker COVID-19 Outbreak in Singapore.新加坡外来务工人员新冠疫情期间的风险沟通与社区参与
Sci Commun. 2022 Apr;44(2):240-251. doi: 10.1177/10755470211061513. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
The Middle East and COVID-19: time for collective action.
中东与 COVID-19:是时候采取集体行动了。
Global Health. 2021 Nov 22;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00786-1.
4
COVID-19 in the Gulf Cooperation Council Member States: An Evidence of Effective Response.海湾阿拉伯国家合作委员会成员国的新冠疫情:有效应对的证据
Oman Med J. 2021 Sep 14;36(5):e300. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.115. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Effective COVID-19 Control: A Comparative Analysis of the Stringency and Timeliness of Government Responses in Asia.有效控制 COVID-19:亚洲各国政府应对措施的严格性和及时性的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;18(16):8686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168686.
6
COVID-19 vaccinations are associated with reduced fatality rates: Evidence from cross-country quasi-experiments.COVID-19 疫苗接种与降低死亡率相关:来自跨国准实验的证据。
J Glob Health. 2021 Jul 17;11:05019. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05019. eCollection 2021.
7
Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries.应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生系统韧性:28 个国家的经验教训。
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Forecasting the SARS COVID-19 pandemic and critical care resources threshold in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: population analysis of aggregate data.预测海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家 SARS-CoV-2 大流行和重症监护资源阈值:综合数据的人口分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e044102. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044102.
9
A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union.海湾合作委员会国家与欧盟应对新冠疫情策略的比较研究
Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100547. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100547. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
10
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.