Suppr超能文献

同伴比较或基于指南的反馈与术后阿片类药物处方:一项随机临床试验。

Peer Comparison or Guideline-Based Feedback and Postsurgery Opioid Prescriptions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240077. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0077.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Excess opioid prescribing after surgery can result in prolonged use and diversion. Email feedback based on social norms may reduce the number of pills prescribed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of 2 social norm-based interventions on reducing guideline-discordant opioid prescribing after surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at a large health care delivery system in northern California between October 2021 and October 2022 included general, obstetric/gynecologic, and orthopedic surgeons with patients aged 18 years or older discharged to home with an oral opioid prescription.

INTERVENTIONS

In 19 hospitals, 3 surgical specialties (general, orthopedic, and obstetric/gynecologic) were randomly assigned to a control group or 1 of 2 interventions. The guidelines intervention provided email feedback to surgeons on opioid prescribing relative to institutionally endorsed guidelines; the peer comparison intervention provided email feedback on opioid prescribing relative to that of peer surgeons. Emails were sent to surgeons with at least 2 guideline-discordant prescriptions in the previous month. The control group had no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The probability that a discharged patient was prescribed a quantity of opioids above the guideline for the respective procedure during the 12 intervention months.

RESULTS

There were 38 235 patients discharged from 640 surgeons during the 12-month intervention period. Control-group surgeons prescribed above guidelines 36.8% of the time during the intervention period compared with 27.5% and 25.4% among surgeons in the peer comparison and guidelines arms, respectively. In adjusted models, the peer comparison intervention reduced guideline-discordant prescribing by 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, -10.5 to -1.1; P = .03) and the guidelines intervention reduced it by 4.7 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to -0.1; P = .05). Effects were driven by surgeons who performed more surgeries and had more guideline-discordant prescribing at baseline. There was no significant difference between interventions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cluster randomized clinical trial, email feedback based on either guidelines or peer comparison reduced opioid prescribing after surgery. Guideline-based feedback was as effective as peer comparison-based feedback. These interventions are simple, low-cost, and scalable, and may reduce downstream opioid misuse.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070338.

摘要

重要性

手术后过量开阿片类药物可能导致药物的长期使用和滥用。基于社会规范的电子邮件反馈可能会减少开出的药丸数量。

目的

评估 2 种基于社会规范的干预措施在减少手术后与指南不符的阿片类药物处方数量方面的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在加利福尼亚北部的一家大型医疗服务系统中进行的集群随机临床试验,参与者为年龄在 18 岁及以上的普通外科、妇产科和骨科医生,这些患者出院后携带口服阿片类药物处方回家。

干预措施

在 19 家医院中,3 个外科专业(普通外科、骨科和妇产科)被随机分配到对照组或 2 种干预措施之一。指南干预措施向外科医生提供有关相对于机构认可的指南的阿片类药物处方的电子邮件反馈;同伴比较干预措施提供了关于与同伴外科医生的阿片类药物处方的电子邮件反馈。向过去一个月至少有 2 份与指南不符的处方的外科医生发送电子邮件。对照组没有干预。

主要结果和测量指标

出院患者在 12 个月的干预期间,按照各自手术的指南开出的阿片类药物数量超过指南的概率。

结果

在 12 个月的干预期间,有 38235 名患者从 640 名外科医生出院。在干预期间,对照组外科医生的处方高于指南的时间占 36.8%,而同伴比较组和指南组的外科医生的处方分别占 25.4%和 27.5%。在调整后的模型中,同伴比较干预措施使与指南不符的处方减少了 5.8 个百分点(95%CI,-10.5 至-1.1;P=0.03),而指南干预措施使与指南不符的处方减少了 4.7 个百分点(95%CI,-9.4 至-0.1;P=0.05)。这些效果是由基线时手术量更大和与指南不符的处方量更多的外科医生驱动的。两种干预措施之间没有显著差异。

结论和相关性

在这项集群随机临床试验中,基于指南或同伴比较的电子邮件反馈减少了手术后的阿片类药物处方。基于指南的反馈与基于同伴比较的反馈同样有效。这些干预措施简单、低成本且可扩展,可能会减少阿片类药物的滥用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070338。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f173/10943416/c714c15c8904/jamahealthforum-e240077-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验