Suppr超能文献

验证空中医疗院前分诊评分在确定 1 级创伤中心资源利用中的作用。

Validation of Air Medical Prehospital Triage Score in Determining Resource Utilization at Level 1 Trauma Centers.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Cavazos, TX.

OhioHealth Research Institute, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Air Med J. 2024 Mar-Apr;43(2):101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Overtriage (ie, delivering less severely injured patients via helicopter) is costly, raises safety concerns, and reduces efficiency of the trauma system. The Air Medical Prehospital Triage (AMPT) scoring system was developed to determine which trauma patients would gain a survival benefit by air transport. The objective of this study was to evaluate the AMPT scoring system as a method of reducing trauma overtriage when helicopter emergency medical services were used.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all scene trauma transports delivered by helicopter to 1 of 2 level 1 trauma centers was evaluated for 1) hospital stay less than 1 day and 2) failure to meet 1 of the following criteria for resource utilization: intensive care unit admission, an operative procedure within the first 24 hours, the need for blood products, Injury Severity Score ≥ 16, or death during hospitalization. Helicopter emergency medical services personnel recorded specific criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) field trauma triage guidelines and AMPT that were met by transported trauma patients.

RESULTS

There were 244 patients in the study population. Eighty-one (33.2%) patients were discharged within 24 hours; 11 (13.5%) of these patients were positive using AMPT scoring, whereas 44 (54.3%) patients met 1 of the CDC criteria. Similarly, 141 (57.8%) patients failed to meet 1 of the level 1 resource criteria; 19 (13.5%) met the AMPT criteria for air medical transport, whereas 84 (59.6%) met 1 of the CDC criteria. Undertriage was 63.5% for AMPT and 20.2% for CDC based on resource utilization criteria.

CONCLUSION

The AMPT score reduced the number of patients who were inappropriately transported to a trauma center. However, this appeared to be at the expense of undertriage. Future studies should focus on developing a refined air medical-specific triage tool that has both low overtriage rates as well as lower undertriage rates.

摘要

目的

过度分诊(即通过直升机运送较轻伤的患者)既耗费成本,又存在安全隐患,还降低了创伤急救系统的效率。航空医疗前分诊(AMPT)评分系统旨在确定哪些创伤患者通过空中转运可获得生存获益。本研究旨在评估 AMPT 评分系统作为减少直升机紧急医疗服务过度分诊的方法。

方法

对使用直升机转运至 2 家 1 级创伤中心之一的所有现场创伤患者进行回顾性研究,评估以下内容:1)住院时间少于 1 天;2)未能满足以下资源利用标准中的 1 项:入住重症监护病房、24 小时内进行手术、需要血液制品、损伤严重程度评分≥16 分,或住院期间死亡。直升机紧急医疗服务人员记录了来自疾病预防控制中心(CDC)现场创伤分诊指南和 AMPT 的具体标准,这些标准符合转运创伤患者的要求。

结果

研究人群中有 244 例患者。81 例(33.2%)患者在 24 小时内出院;其中 11 例(13.5%)使用 AMPT 评分呈阳性,而 44 例(54.3%)患者符合 CDC 标准中的 1 项。同样,141 例(57.8%)患者未满足 1 级资源标准中的 1 项;19 例(13.5%)符合 AMPT 空中医疗转运标准,而 84 例(59.6%)符合 CDC 标准中的 1 项。基于资源利用标准,AMPT 的过度分诊率为 63.5%,CDC 为 20.2%。

结论

AMPT 评分减少了不恰当地转运到创伤中心的患者数量。然而,这似乎是以过度分诊为代价的。未来的研究应专注于开发一种新的、专门针对空中医疗的分诊工具,该工具具有较低的过度分诊率和较低的过度分诊率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验