Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Hector Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Oct;274(7):1625-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01782-3. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
Understanding the relationship between psychopathology and major domains of human neurobehavioral functioning may identify new transdiagnostic treatment targets. However, studies examining the interrelationship between psychopathological symptoms, sensorimotor, cognitive, and global functioning in a transdiagnostic sample are lacking. We hypothesized a close relationship between sensorimotor and cognitive functioning in a transdiagnostic patient sample.
We applied network analysis and community detection methods to examine the interplay and centrality [expected influence (EI) and strength] between psychopathological symptoms, sensorimotor, cognitive, and global functioning in a transdiagnostic sample consisting of 174 schizophrenia spectrum (SSD) and 38 mood disorder (MOD) patients. All patients (n = 212) were examined with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Heidelberg Neurological Soft Signs Scale (NSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and the Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool for Schizophrenia consisted of trail making test B (TMT-B), category fluency (CF) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST).
NSS showed closer connections with TMT-B, CF, and DSST than with GAF and PANSS. DSST, PANSS general, and NSS motor coordination scores showed the highest EI. Sensory integration, DSST, and CF showed the highest strength.
The close connection between sensorimotor and cognitive impairment as well as the high centrality of sensorimotor symptoms suggests that both domains share aspects of SSD and MOD pathophysiology. But, because the majority of the study population was diagnosed with SSD, the question as to whether sensorimotor symptoms are really a transdiagnostic therapeutic target needs to be examined in future studies including more balanced diagnostic groups.
理解精神病理学与人类神经行为功能的主要领域之间的关系,可能会发现新的跨诊断治疗靶点。然而,在跨诊断样本中,研究精神病理症状、感觉运动、认知和整体功能之间的相互关系的研究还很少。我们假设在跨诊断患者样本中,感觉运动和认知功能之间存在密切的关系。
我们应用网络分析和社区检测方法,研究了由 174 例精神分裂症谱系(SSD)和 38 例心境障碍(MOD)患者组成的跨诊断样本中精神病理症状、感觉运动、认知和整体功能之间的相互作用和中心性(预期影响(EI)和强度)。所有患者(n=212)均接受阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)、海德堡神经软体征量表(NSS)、总体功能评估(GAF)和简短认知评估工具对精神分裂症组成的追踪测试 B(TMT-B)、类别流畅性(CF)和数字符号替代测试(DSST)的检查。
NSS 与 TMT-B、CF 和 DSST 的连接比 GAF 和 PANSS 更密切。DSST、PANSS 一般和 NSS 运动协调评分具有最高的 EI。感觉统合、DSST 和 CF 显示出最高的强度。
感觉运动和认知障碍之间的密切联系以及感觉运动症状的高中心性表明,这两个领域都与 SSD 和 MOD 的病理生理学有关。但是,由于研究人群中的大多数被诊断为 SSD,因此在未来的研究中,包括更平衡的诊断组,需要研究感觉运动症状是否真的是一个跨诊断的治疗靶点。