Suppr超能文献

ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并活动性癌症患者的心力衰竭再入院情况

Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Active Cancer.

作者信息

Dafaalla Mohamed, Abramov Dmitry, Van Spall Harriette G C, Ghosh Arjun K, Gale Chris P, Zaman Sarah, Rashid Muhammad, Mamas Mamas A

机构信息

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.

Loma Linda University International Heart Institute, Loma Linda, California, USA.

出版信息

JACC CardioOncol. 2024 Jan 9;6(1):117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.10.011. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have examined readmission with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited data are available on HF readmission in cancer patients post-AMI.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with HF readmission in cancer patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registry. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to evaluate HF readmission at 30 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 326,551 STEMI indexed admissions were included, with 7,090 (2.2%) patients having active cancer. The cancer group was less likely to be admitted under the care of a cardiologist (74.5% vs 81.9%) and had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%;  < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%). There was a significant prescription gap in the administration of post-AMI medications upon discharge such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.5% vs 71.1%) and beta-blockers (58.4% vs 68.0%) in cancer patients. The cancer group had a higher rate of HF readmission at 30 days (3.2% vs 2.3%) and 1 year (9.4% vs 7.3%). However, after adjustment, cancer was not independently associated with HF readmission at 30 days (subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86-1.28) or 1 year (subdistribution HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). The opportunity-based quality indicator was associated with higher rates of HF readmission independent of cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients receive care that differs in important ways from patients without cancer. Greater implementation of evidence-based care may reduce HF readmissions, including in cancer patients.

摘要

背景

尽管众多研究已对急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心力衰竭(HF)的再入院情况进行了调查,但关于AMI后癌症患者HF再入院的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)癌症患者HF再入院的发生率及相关因素。

方法

从英国心肌梗死国家审计项目登记处和英国国家医院事件统计住院患者护理登记处获取2005年1月至2019年3月期间全国范围内相关的STEMI患者队列。采用多变量Fine-Gray竞争风险模型评估30天和1年时的HF再入院情况。

结果

共纳入326,551例STEMI索引入院患者,其中7,090例(2.2%)患有活动性癌症。癌症组在心脏病专家护理下入院的可能性较小(74.5%对81.9%),侵入性冠状动脉造影率较低(62.2%对72.7%;<0.001),经皮冠状动脉介入治疗率也较低(58.4%对69.5%)。出院时,癌症患者在服用AMI后药物如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(49.5%对71.1%)和β受体阻滞剂(58.4%对68.0%)方面存在显著的用药差距。癌症组在30天(3.2%对2.3%)和1年(9.4%对7.3%)时的HF再入院率较高。然而,经过调整后,癌症与30天(亚分布风险比:1.05;95%置信区间:0.86 - 1.28)或1年(亚分布风险比:1.03;95%置信区间:0.92 - 1.16)时的HF再入院无独立相关性。基于机会的质量指标与更高的HF再入院率相关,且与癌症诊断无关。

结论

癌症患者接受的治疗在重要方面与非癌症患者不同。更多地实施循证护理可能会降低HF再入院率,包括癌症患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c99/10950442/8d5faa680534/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验